IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ris/tecemp/2210.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring the credibility of consumer-generated media (CGM): a scale to test credibility in the field of tourism

Author

Listed:
  • Castano, Ricardo

    (Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Cali, Colombia)

  • Escandon-Barbosa, Diana

    (Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Cali, Colombia)

Abstract

This research proposes a scale to measure the credibility of consumer-generated media (CGM). Two studies were carried out: first, a qualitative study based on eleven in-depth interviews with experts in tourism decisions; and second, we ran a quantitative analysis on a sample of 300 frequent users of tourism CGM platforms. The resulting scale, which consists of 4 dimensions and 12 items, is used to measure the credibility of information published in the tourism CGM platforms. The scale was tested for its dimensionality, reliability, and validity; and the results corroborate its accuracy and value as a source of information for travel decision-making. Finally, future lines of research are presented

Suggested Citation

  • Castano, Ricardo & Escandon-Barbosa, Diana, 2022. "Measuring the credibility of consumer-generated media (CGM): a scale to test credibility in the field of tourism," TEC Empresarial, School of Business, Costa Rica Institute of Technology (ITCR), vol. 16(2), pages 79-93.
    • Handle: RePEc:ris:tecemp:2210
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://revistas.tec.ac.cr/index.php/tec_empresarial/article/view/6187
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Newell, Stephen J. & Goldsmith, Ronald E., 2001. "The development of a scale to measure perceived corporate credibility," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 52(3), pages 235-247, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. S. Venus Jin & Aziz Muqaddam, 2019. "Product placement 2.0: “Do Brands Need Influencers, or Do Influencers Need Brands?”," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(5), pages 522-537, September.
    2. Sarstedt, Marko & Wilczynski, Petra & Melewar, T.C., 2013. "Measuring reputation in global markets—A comparison of reputation measures’ convergent and criterion validities," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 329-339.
    3. Brühl, Rolf & Basel, Jörn S. & Kury, Max F., 2018. "Communication after an integrity-based trust violation: How organizational account giving affects trust," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 161-170.
    4. Andrea Pérez & Ignacio Rodríguez del Bosque, 2015. "How Customer Support for Corporate Social Responsibility Influences the Image of Companies: Evidence from the Banking Industry," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(3), pages 155-168, May.
    5. Carroll, Ryall & Kachersky, Luke, 2019. "Service fundraising and the role of perceived donation efficacy in individual charitable giving," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 254-263.
    6. Farah Mastura Noor Azman & Zainol Bidin, 2015. "Factors Influencing Zakat Compliance Behavior on Saving," International Journal of Business and Social Research, MIR Center for Socio-Economic Research, vol. 5(1), pages 118-128, January.
    7. Guido Berens & Cees Riel & Johan Rekom, 2007. "The CSR-Quality Trade-Off: When can Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Ability Compensate Each Other?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 74(3), pages 233-252, September.
    8. Malshe, Avinash, 2010. "How is marketers' credibility construed within the sales-marketing interface?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 13-19, January.
    9. Astrachan, Claudia Binz & Patel, Vijay K. & Wanzenried, Gabrielle, 2014. "A comparative study of CB-SEM and PLS-SEM for theory development in family firm research," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 116-128.
    10. Mo Ran Yi, 2023. "Corporate Reputation and Users’ Behavioral Intentions: Is Reputation the Master Key That Moves Consumers?," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(1), pages 21582440231, February.
    11. Katie Angliss, 2022. "An Alternative Approach to Measuring University Reputation," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 25(1), pages 33-49, February.
    12. Balboni, Bernardo, 2008. "Perceived corporate credibility as the emergent property of corporate reputation’s transmission process," MPRA Paper 7944, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Contreras-Pacheco, Orlando E., 2017. "Image, Credibility and Reputation: Perceptions of Deceitful Corporate Communication in the Classroom," MPRA Paper 89207, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Md. Uzir Hossain Uzir & Abu Bakar Abdul Hamid & Ishraq Jerin & Ahmad Shaharudin Abdul Latiff & Ramayah Thurasamy, 2021. "Customer satisfaction and brand loyalty to electronic home appliances in Bangladesh: the contingent role of brand trust," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 1(6), pages 1-35, June.
    15. Anne Michaels & Michael Grüning, 2016. "Interne Treiber von CSR-Publizität: Der Einfluss von Corporate Identity," NachhaltigkeitsManagementForum | Sustainability Management Forum, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 315-324, December.
    16. Ramendra Pratap Singh & Neelotpaul Banerjee, 2018. "A Study on Exploring the Factors Influencing Celebrity Endorsement Credibility," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 19(2), pages 494-509, April.
    17. Patrick Hartmann & Paula Fernández & Vanessa Apaolaza & Martin Eisend & Clare D’Souza, 2021. "Explaining Viral CSR Message Propagation in Social Media: The Role of Normative Influences," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 173(2), pages 365-385, October.
    18. Lim, Rachel Esther & Sung, Yoon Hi & Lee, Wei-Na, 2018. "Connecting with global consumers through corporate social responsibility initiatives: A cross-cultural investigation of congruence effects of attribution and communication styles," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 11-19.
    19. Jahn, Johannes & Brühl, Rolf, 2019. "Can bad news be good? On the positive and negative effects of including moderately negative information in CSR disclosures," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 117-128.
    20. Albersmeier, Friederike & Spiller, Achim, 2008. "Supply Chain Reputation in der Fleischwirtschaft," DARE Discussion Papers 0811, Georg-August University of Göttingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (DARE).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:tecemp:2210. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Esteban Lafuente (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaitccr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.