IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ris/statec/0052.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improvement of the economic efficiency of protective forest plantations in the agricultural sector of the Russian Federation

Author

Listed:
  • Achokh, Yuri R.

    (Kuban State Agrarian University)

Abstract

The condition and efficiency of land use is a determining factor in ensuring the balanced development of the agro-industrial complex, nature management, as well as environmental and food security of the country. The priority areas for ensuring sustainable development of the agro-industrial complex include the fight against deforestation; rational use of vulnerable ecosystems with desertification and drought; creation of compensating sites with forest vegetation; greening of land use through the new optimal planning of agrolandscapes. The methodological and theoretical basis of the study is the studies and works of leading domestic and foreign scientists, materials of scientific and practical conferences of various levels in the field of protective afforestation and agroforestry. The information base for the study is the regulatory legal acts (the Forest Code, a number of federal laws, orders of the Federal Forestry Agency, etc.) that govern issues on the problem under study. As a result of the research, an assessment of the state of protective forest plantations in the Russian Federation is given, potential advantages of using protective forest plantations in the agricultural sector are identified, the role of the state in solving environmental and social problems on this issue is determined. State measures are proposed to solve the problems of increasing the efficiency of the use of protective forest plantations in the agro-industrial complex, including the transfer of protective forest plantations to the ownership of agricultural enterprises and farms with mandatory responsibility for their proper maintenance and preservation.

Suggested Citation

  • Achokh, Yuri R., 2020. "Improvement of the economic efficiency of protective forest plantations in the agricultural sector of the Russian Federation," Economic Consultant, Roman I. Ostapenko, vol. 29(1), pages 39-48.
    • Handle: RePEc:ris:statec:0052
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://statecounsellor.files.wordpress.com/2020/03/200104.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Craig R. Elevitch & D. Niki Mazaroli & Diane Ragone, 2018. "Agroforestry Standards for Regenerative Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-21, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. André Eduardo Biscaia Lacerda & Ana Lúcia Hanisch & Evelyn Roberta Nimmo, 2020. "Leveraging Traditional Agroforestry Practices to Support Sustainable and Agrobiodiverse Landscapes in Southern Brazil," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-19, June.
    2. Dong Chen & Kangning Xiong & Juan Zhang, 2022. "Progress on the Integrity Protection in the Natural World Heritage Site and Agroforestry Development in the Buffer Zone: An Implications for the World Heritage Karst," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-18, December.
    3. Angelica Melone & Leah L. Bremer & Susan E. Crow & Zoe Hastings & Kawika B. Winter & Tamara Ticktin & Yoshimi M. Rii & Maile Wong & Kānekoa Kukea-Shultz & Sheree J. Watson & Clay Trauernicht, 2021. "Assessing Baseline Carbon Stocks for Forest Transitions: A Case Study of Agroforestry Restoration from Hawaiʻi," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-17, February.
    4. Kelly R. Wilson & Robert L. Myers & Mary K. Hendrickson & Emily A. Heaton, 2022. "Different Stakeholders’ Conceptualizations and Perspectives of Regenerative Agriculture Reveals More Consensus Than Discord," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-14, November.
    5. repec:caa:jnlage:v:preprint:id:281-2023-agricecon is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Yudha Kristanto & Suria Tarigan & Tania June & Bambang Sulistyantara & Pini Wijayanti, 2024. "Indirect use value of improved soil health as natural capital that supports essential ecosystem services: A case study of cacao agroforestry," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 70(3), pages 137-154.
    7. Luján Soto, Raquel & Cuéllar Padilla, Mamen & de Vente, Joris, 2020. "Participatory selection of soil quality indicators for monitoring the impacts of regenerative agriculture on ecosystem services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).
    8. Elevitch, Craig R. & Johnson, C. Richard, 2020. "A procedure for ranking parameter importance for estimation in predictive mechanistic models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 419(C).
    9. Tom O’Donoghue & Budiman Minasny & Alex McBratney, 2022. "Regenerative Agriculture and Its Potential to Improve Farmscape Function," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-25, May.
    10. Schreefel, L. & van Zanten, H.H.E. & Groot, J.C.J. & Timler, C.J. & Zwetsloot, M.J. & Schrijver, A. Pas & Creamer, R.E. & Schulte, R.P.O. & de Boer, I.J.M., 2022. "Tailor-made solutions for regenerative agriculture in the Netherlands," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    11. Rhyllary Coelho e Silva & Ricardo de Siqueira Camargo & Gabriel da Silva Medina & Mariana Gatti & Eva Sevigne-Itoiz & Lorenzo Di Lucia & Onesmus N. Mwabonje, 2022. "Fashion Market Niches for Organic Agroforestry Cotton: Market Potential for Promoting Sustainable Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    12. Jha, Srijna & Kaechele, Harald & Sieber, Stefan, 2021. "Factors influencing the adoption of agroforestry by smallholder farmer households in Tanzania: Case studies from Morogoro and Dodoma," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    13. Jana Krčmářová & Lukáš Kala & Alica Brendzová & Tomáš Chabada, 2021. "Building Agroforestry Policy Bottom-Up: Knowledge of Czech Farmers on Trees in Farmland," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-18, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    protective forest plantations; forest belts; agro-industrial complex; agrolandscapes; agricultural land; productivity; land reclamation; economic efficiency;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q10 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:statec:0052. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Roman I. Ostapenko (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.