IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ris/buecrj/0167.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Evaluation of the Transparency in the Inspection Practices of the Turkish Government Auditing Units over General Budget Institutions

Author

Listed:
  • Gök, Musa

    (Balıkesir University)

  • Akar, Sevda

    (Balıkesir University)

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the transparency problem of public auditing for general budget institutions in Turkey. In this study, transparency in the auditing operations of 47 general budget institutions was studied by searching the institutions’ web sites. Upon examination, it is seen that the general practice in these public organizations is to keep the audit reports and activity reports of the audit committees keep away from public access. Only exceptions to this general tendency are the Ministry of Culture and Tourism and General Directorate of Land Registry and Cadastre. These institutions open some of their audit reports and unit operation reports to the public. In regard to internal audit units, public organizations follow even more strict closeness. They do not share directly with the public the unit activity reports and audit reports but send them as a legal obligation to the Internal Audit Coordination Board. The public institutions which have been subject to external auditing also do not share the external auditing results. The internal inspection units of institutions send their reports to Internal Audit Coordination Board as a legal obligation. However, Turkish Court of Accounts has begun to publish its audit reports since December 2013. The results of the study point out that transparent auditing system could have not been constructed for fiscal management up to now. Turkish public auditing system need to be redesigned by legal modifications and institutional adjustments and it is suggested that new structure should include the boards of inspection. In order to improve the transparency and accountability of the administration and the auditing system, a convenient legal environment need to created. In addition to all these, it is remembered that fairness and transparency in auditing and its implementation in an efficient way require compatible changes in administrative and institutional mentality.

Suggested Citation

  • Gök, Musa & Akar, Sevda, 2014. "An Evaluation of the Transparency in the Inspection Practices of the Turkish Government Auditing Units over General Budget Institutions," Business and Economics Research Journal, Uludag University, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, vol. 5(4), pages 43-69, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:ris:buecrj:0167
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.berjournal.com/an-evaluation-of-the-transparency-in-the-inspection-practices-of-the-turkish-government-auditing-units-over-general-budget-institutions
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Audit in public sector; transparency of audit; budget; Turkey;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H61 - Public Economics - - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt - - - Budget; Budget Systems
    • H80 - Public Economics - - Miscellaneous Issues - - - General
    • H83 - Public Economics - - Miscellaneous Issues - - - Public Administration
    • H89 - Public Economics - - Miscellaneous Issues - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:buecrj:0167. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Adem Anbar (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iiulutr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.