IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rfa/journl/v6y2018i5p13-23.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Informed Consent in Social Sciences Research: Ethical Challenges

Author

Listed:
  • Carlos Miguel Ferreira
  • Sandro Serpa

Abstract

Informed consent is a critical procedure for the fulfilment of the ethical dimension in scientific research in social sciences. On the basis of a stance centred in Sociology research practices developed by the authors, this paper reflects on informed consent, its relevance in research, and procedures involved in its production and its concomitant implications. The reflection on the research process is stressed, emphasising the need to not consider the informed consent procedure as something that is fulfilled only once, but rather as something that integrates both the research process and its product and that, therefore, should be continuously considered and assessed throughout research.

Suggested Citation

  • Carlos Miguel Ferreira & Sandro Serpa, 2018. "Informed Consent in Social Sciences Research: Ethical Challenges," International Journal of Social Science Studies, Redfame publishing, vol. 6(5), pages 13-23, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:rfa:journl:v:6:y:2018:i:5:p:13-23
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://redfame.com/journal/index.php/ijsss/article/view/3106/3278
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://redfame.com/journal/index.php/ijsss/article/view/3106
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abimbola Farinde, 2014. "The History and Current Status of Informed Consent," International Journal of Social Work, Macrothink Institute, vol. 1(1), pages 78-92, June.
    2. Margaret C. Hardy, 2016. "Drafting an Effective Ethical Code of Conduct for Professional Societies: A Practical Guide," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-11, November.
    3. Nadarajan (Raj) Sethuraju & Paul Prew & Abdihakin Abdi & Martel Pipkins, 2013. "The Consequences of Teaching Critical Sociology on Course Evaluations," SAGE Open, , vol. 3(3), pages 21582440134, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Brian Pickering, 2021. "Trust, but Verify: Informed Consent, AI Technologies, and Public Health Emergencies," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-20, May.
    2. Carlos Miguel Ferreira, 2019. "Sociology and Digital Culture," International Journal of Social Science Studies, Redfame publishing, vol. 7(3), pages 101-106, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carlos Miguel Ferreira & Sandro Serpa, 2017. "Challenges in the Teaching of Sociology in Higher Education. Contributions to a Discussion," Societies, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-11, October.
    2. Carlos Miguel Ferreira & Sandro Serpa, 2019. "Dialogues between Sociology and History," International Journal of Higher Education, Sciedu Press, vol. 8(6), pages 112-112, December.
    3. Carlos Miguel Ferreira & Maria José Sá & José Garrucho Martins & Sandro Serpa, 2020. "The COVID-19 Contagion–Pandemic Dyad: A View from Social Sciences," Societies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-19, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    informed consent; ethics in research; sociology; social sciences;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfa:journl:v:6:y:2018:i:5:p:13-23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Redfame publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.