IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rfa/journl/v5y2017i5p24-45.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Searching For Influential Actors in Co-Offending Networks: The Recruiter

Author

Listed:
  • Ashley Englefield
  • Barak Ariel

Abstract

The co-offending literature research has recently unraveled the possible existence of a specific class of offenders commonly referred to as a “recruiter”: one who recruits others who are younger or less experienced for the purpose of offending. Yet the available evidence has focused on small or non-representative samples, and has supplied a limited conceptual scope for explaining how instigation takes place within co-offending groups. We provide evidence from population-level arrest records over eight years in Sacramento, California, is presented on 251,285 criminal charges (n=80,245 offenders). Social network analysis to used to study how “crime ideas” are transmitted. We identified 1,092 recruiters, yet this subgroup is responsible for 6% of arrest cases in Sacramento and a disproportionate number of younger and less experienced recruits. The data suggest a pattern of recruitment specialization in specific crime categories and wider age differentials in against-persons rather than property crime categories. We contextualize the findings within Dawkin’s (1976) meme theory as a more robust conceptual framework for explaining how recruitment takes place, why “crime ideas” can be seen as units of imitation, and under which conditions they are subsequently replicated, reproduced, and evolve. Directions for future research are then considered, with an emphasis on crime control initiatives.

Suggested Citation

  • Ashley Englefield & Barak Ariel, 2017. "Searching For Influential Actors in Co-Offending Networks: The Recruiter," International Journal of Social Science Studies, Redfame publishing, vol. 5(5), pages 24-45, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:rfa:journl:v:5:y:2017:i:5:p:24-45
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://redfame.com/journal/index.php/ijsss/article/view/2351/2467
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://redfame.com/journal/index.php/ijsss/article/view/2351
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anthony A. Braga & David L. Weisburd, 2012. "The Effects of “Pulling Levers” Focused Deterrence Strategies on Crime," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(1), pages 1-90.
    2. Wilkinson, Leland, 2006. "Revising the Pareto Chart," The American Statistician, American Statistical Association, vol. 60, pages 332-334, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Massimo Borg & Paul Refalo & Emmanuel Francalanza, 2023. "Failure Detection Techniques on the Demand Side of Smart and Sustainable Compressed Air Systems: A Systematic Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-36, March.
    2. Naci Akdemir & Serkan Yenal, 2021. "How Phishers Exploit the Coronavirus Pandemic: A Content Analysis of COVID-19 Themed Phishing Emails," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, July.
    3. Amir Abbas Shojaie & Sepideh Babaie & Emel Sayah & Davood Mohammaditabar, 2018. "Analysis and Prioritization of Green Health Suppliers Using Fuzzy ELECTRE Method with a Case Study," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 19(1), pages 39-52, March.
    4. Cooper, Kerris Maya Louise & Lacey, Nicola Mary, 2019. "Physical safety and security: policies, spending and outcomes 2015-2020," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 121549, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Daniel Dasig Jr, 2017. "A frontier in organizational and business process innovation in service management through lean six sigma Kaizen project implementation," Journal of Administrative and Business Studies, Professor Dr. Usman Raja, vol. 3(6), pages 263-283.
    6. Kerris Cooper & Nicola Lacey, 2019. "Physical safety and Security: Policies, spending and outcomes 2015-2020," CASE - Social Policies and Distributional Outcomes Research Papers 05, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    7. Dimosthenis Kifokeris & Yiannis Xenidis, 2021. "Game Theory-Based Minimization of the Ostracism Risk in Construction Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-20, June.
    8. Daniel Mejía & Ervyn Norza & Santiago Tobón & Martín Vanegas-Arias, 2022. "Broken windows policing and crime: Evidence from 80 Colombian cities," Chapters, in: Paolo Buonanno & Paolo Vanin & Juan Vargas (ed.), A Modern Guide to the Economics of Crime, chapter 4, pages 55-87, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    9. repec:cep:spccrp:05 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Davide Di Fatta & Roberto Musotto & Walter Vesperi, 2016. "Analyzing E-Commerce Websites: A Quali-Quantitive Approach for the User Perceived Web Quality (UPWQ)," International Journal of Marketing Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(6), pages 33-44, December.
    11. Vlad-Tudor TRINCĂ, 2020. "Lean and Quality Management Tools Used in Performance Measurement," REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 21(5), pages 719-729, December.
    12. Aaron Chalfin & Michael LaForest & Jacob Kaplan, 2021. "Can Precision Policing Reduce Gun Violence? Evidence from “Gang Takedowns” in New York City," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(4), pages 1047-1082, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    recruitment; social networks; co-offending; meme theory;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfa:journl:v:5:y:2017:i:5:p:24-45. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Redfame publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.