IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rbs/ijbrss/v10y2021i3p53-64.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An analysis on the improvement of system for proof of delivery: PT. Gunadhya Rajawali Logistik

Author

Listed:
  • Aliya Dharaningtyas

    (School of Business and Management, Bandung Institute of Technology, Jakarta, Indonesia)

  • Adirizal Nizar

    (School of Business and Management, Bandung Institute of Technology, Jakarta, Indonesia)

Abstract

The delivery system for Base Transceiver System (BTS) to strengthen the telecommunication network throughout Indonesia maritime country is needed to speed up the process due to uneven distribution of sufficient telecommunications infrastructure. PT. Gunadhya Rajawali Logistik (GRL) is a third-party logistics company that focuses on transportation and warehouse management and delivery for telecommunication equipment tools. Unfortunately, in delivering BTS installation part throughout Indonesia, PT. GRL received several warning letters and had to pay a penalty from one of customers, for being late in reporting the delivery proof. This study aims to analyze the root causes of late submission of Soft Copy of Proof of Delivery (SCPOD) to avoid penalty given by the customer and determine suitable solutions to improve the process. The approach used in this study is lean six sigma with the help of Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, and Control (DMAIC) roadmap. According to the interview with the employees related, the root causes of late submission of SCPOD are irresponsible drivers, indiscipline drivers in carrying out deliveries, and lack of data management in the transportation system. To be able to solve this problem, several proposed solutions can be applied. The proposed solutions to overcome the root causes that should be applied by the company are to hire a document control, retraining the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for drivers, utilize transportation management system application, and apply incentive systems for drivers. In the future, it is recommended for PT. GRL to have a minimum standard in recruiting the drivers for example only recruit who possess a minimum of high school education to ease the completion of administrative tasks. Key Words: Logistics, Lean Six Sigma, Transportation Management System

Suggested Citation

  • Aliya Dharaningtyas & Adirizal Nizar, 2021. "An analysis on the improvement of system for proof of delivery: PT. Gunadhya Rajawali Logistik," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 10(3), pages 53-64, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:10:y:2021:i:3:p:53-64
    DOI: 10.20525/ijrbs.v10i3.1091
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijrbs/article/view/1091/834
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v10i3.1091
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.20525/ijrbs.v10i3.1091?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vipul Gupta & Padmanav Acharya & Manoj Patwardhan, 2012. "Monitoring quality goals through lean Six‐Sigma insures competitiveness," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 61(2), pages 194-203, January.
    2. Douglas C. Montgomery & William H. Woodall, 2008. "An Overview of Six Sigma," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 76(3), pages 329-346, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Boon Sin, Ang & Zailani, Suhaiza & Iranmanesh, Mohammad & Ramayah, T., 2015. "Structural equation modelling on knowledge creation in Six Sigma DMAIC project and its impact on organizational performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 105-117.
    2. L. Thiruvarasu Letchumanan & Hamed Gholami & Noordin Mohd Yusof & Nor Hasrul Akhmal Bin Ngadiman & Anas A. Salameh & Dalia Štreimikienė & Fausto Cavallaro, 2022. "Analyzing the Factors Enabling Green Lean Six Sigma Implementation in the Industry 4.0 Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-15, March.
    3. Roger W. Hoerl & Ronald D. Snee, 2009. "Post‐financial meltdown: What do the services industries need from us now?," Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(5), pages 509-521, September.
    4. Adnan Ahmad Olwan & Hani Jaza’a Irtaimeh & Prof. Dr. Musa Al-Lozi, 2019. "Strategic Leadership Competencies and its Relationship on Achieving Organizational Excellence: A Theoretical Study," Journal of Business & Management (COES&RJ-JBM), , vol. 7(1), pages 58-79, January.
    5. Boby John & K. K. Chowdhury, 2021. "Minimizing the Dry Content Variation in the Pulp Drying Process Using Six Sigma Methodology," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 2(4), pages 1-21, December.
    6. Mahmoud Dehghan Nayeri & Malihe Rostami, 2016. "Effectiveness of six sigma methodology through BSC in banking industry," Journal of Asian Business Strategy, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 6(1), pages 13-21, January.
    7. Anshu Gupta & Pallavi Sharma & Akansha Jain & Hongbo Xue & S. C. Malik & P. C. Jha, 2023. "An integrated DEMATEL Six Sigma hybrid framework for manufacturing process improvement," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 322(2), pages 713-753, March.
    8. Yang, Yefei & Lee, Peter K.C. & Cheng, T.C.E., 2016. "Continuous improvement competence, employee creativity, and new service development performance: A frontline employee perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(P2), pages 275-288.
    9. Rainer Alt, 2019. "Electronic Markets on digital transformation methodologies," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 29(3), pages 307-313, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:10:y:2021:i:3:p:53-64. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Umit Hacioglu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ssbffea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.