IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rau/journl/v10y2016i2p275-284.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Some Controversies On The Statistical Methods Used In The Educational Research

Author

Listed:
  • Olga Yanushkevichiene

    (Lithuanian University of Educational Sciences, Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Romanas Yanushkevichius

    (Lithuanian University of Educational Sciences, Lithuania)

  • Marilena Aura Din

    (Romanian-American University, Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

This paper aims to draw attention to two aspects on the use of mathematical statistics for educational research purposes. Firstly, we need to take care about the adequacy of the application of a mathematical statistics method to examine various phenomena of teaching-learning process. As an example considered in our paper is the adequacy of the Student's t-test for testing hypotheses in the educational researches. Secondly, we must take care that research in the field of pedagogy were urgent and the experiment itself did not destroy the natural character of the phenomena. As an example, we try to understand how the computer affects the quality of mastering the material under study and the personal development of student. The results of our study on the two levels of interest are: Firstly, the use of Student's t-test is not adequacy with any type of educational data analyzed, if it does not meet the condition of normality. Secondly, two experiments in question to understand how the computer affects the learning process highlight different things in statistics: once the independence of the two variables and another once the existence of a relationship of dependency, but indirect one. Both highlights are controversial with the general perception on the positive effect of computer-aided learning on students’ performances, so that a weak experimental design could alter the nature of a relationship between random variables.

Suggested Citation

  • Olga Yanushkevichiene & Romanas Yanushkevichius & Marilena Aura Din, 2016. "Some Controversies On The Statistical Methods Used In The Educational Research," Romanian Economic Business Review, Romanian-American University, vol. 10(2), pages 275-284, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:rau:journl:v:10:y:2016:i:2:p:275-284
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.rebe.rau.ro/RePEc/rau/jisomg/WI16/JISOM-WI16-A01.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:tpr:journl:edfpol:v:10:y:2015:i:4:p:508-534 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Cory Koedel & Eric Parsons & Michael Podgursky & Mark Ehlert, 2015. "Teacher Preparation Programs and Teacher Quality: Are There Real Differences Across Programs?," Education Finance and Policy, MIT Press, vol. 10(4), pages 508-534, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. von Hippel, Paul T. & Bellows, Laura & Osborne, Cynthia & Lincove, Jane Arnold & Mills, Nick, 2016. "Teacher quality differences between teacher preparation programs: How big? How reliable? Which programs are different?," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 31-45.
    2. James G. MacKinnon, 2019. "How cluster‐robust inference is changing applied econometrics," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 52(3), pages 851-881, August.
    3. Koedel, Cory & Mihaly, Kata & Rockoff, Jonah E., 2015. "Value-added modeling: A review," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 180-195.
    4. Goldhaber, Dan & Liddle, Stephanie & Theobald, Roddy, 2013. "The gateway to the profession: Assessing teacher preparation programs based on student achievement," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 29-44.
    5. Antecol, Heather & Eren, Ozkan & Ozbeklik, Serkan, 2013. "The effect of Teach for America on the distribution of student achievement in primary school: Evidence from a randomized experiment," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 113-125.
    6. Bouguen, Adrien, 2016. "Adjusting content to individual student needs: Further evidence from an in-service teacher training program," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 90-112.
    7. Kata Mihaly & Daniel McCaffrey & Tim R. Sass & J. R. Lockwood, 2013. "Where You Come From or Where You Go? Distinguishing Between School Quality and the Effectiveness of Teacher Preparation Program Graduates," Education Finance and Policy, MIT Press, vol. 8(4), pages 459-493, October.
    8. Gershenson, Seth, 2021. "Identifying and Producing Effective Teachers," IZA Discussion Papers 14096, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    9. Backes, Ben & Goldhaber, Dan & Cade, Whitney & Sullivan, Kate & Dodson, Melissa, 2018. "Can UTeach? Assessing the relative effectiveness of STEM teachers," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 184-198.
    10. von Hippel, Paul T. & Bellows, Laura, 2018. "How much does teacher quality vary across teacher preparation programs? Reanalyses from six states," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 298-312.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rau:journl:v:10:y:2016:i:2:p:275-284. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alex Tabusca (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/firauro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.