IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prg/jnlsev/v2014y2014i2id108p65-82.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Typology of Forms of the Ordinary Legislative Procedure from the Point of View of the Degree of Supranationality in Decision-making
[Typologie forem zvláštního legislativního postupu z hlediska míry supranacionality při rozhodování]

Author

Listed:
  • Jan Hřích

Abstract

The Lisbon Treaty has carried out an exact and systematic classification of decision procedures in the legislative area. It distinguishes two kinds of mutual interaction of the most important EU organs in adopting legislative acts of the Union: the ordinary legislative procedure (OLP) and the special legislative procedure (SLP). While the OLP has only one firmly set form, the SLP has in total four concrete forms, depending on whether the Council decides by a qualified majority or unanimously, and whether the European Parliament (EP), is engaged in the decision-making merely on the basis of unbinding consultation or there is unconditionally required its consent for the adoption of the legislative proposal. There frequently occurs an opinion that the SLP is being applied in areas where member states have been unable to agree on the application of majority decision-making, i.e. on the abolition of the possibility of veto from the part of any of them. The article brings forth a certain discussion about a situation when the application of the SLP means the exclusion of all supranational elements from decision-making and when on the contrary, it can signify their certain strengthening in comparison with the OLP.

Suggested Citation

  • Jan Hřích, 2014. "Typology of Forms of the Ordinary Legislative Procedure from the Point of View of the Degree of Supranationality in Decision-making [Typologie forem zvláštního legislativního postupu z hlediska mír," Současná Evropa, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2014(2), pages 65-82.
  • Handle: RePEc:prg:jnlsev:v:2014:y:2014:i:2:id:108:p:65-82
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://wep.vse.cz/artkey/sev-201402-0004_Typologie-forem-zvlastniho-legislativniho-postupu-z-hlediska-miry-supranacionality-pri-rozhodovani.php
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: http://wep.vse.cz/pdfs/sev/2014/02/04.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jonathan Golub, 2007. "Survival Analysis and European Union Decision-making," European Union Politics, , vol. 8(2), pages 155-179, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tansey, Oisin & Koehler, Kevin & Schmotz, Alexander, 2017. "Ties to the rest: autocratic linkages and regime survival," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 50(9), pages 1221-1254.
    2. Madeleine O. Hosli & Běla Plechanovová & Serguei Kaniovski, 2018. "Vote Probabilities, Thresholds and Actor Preferences: Decision Capacity and the Council of the European Union," Homo Oeconomicus: Journal of Behavioral and Institutional Economics, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 31-52, June.
    3. Matthew Gould & Matthew D. Rablen, 2019. "Are World Leaders Loss Averse?," CESifo Working Paper Series 7763, CESifo.
    4. Jørgen Bølstad & James P. Cross, 2016. "Not all Treaties are Created Equal: The Effects of Treaty Changes on Legislative Efficiency in the EU," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(4), pages 793-808, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Lisbon Treaty; Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union; Ordinary Legislative Procedure; Special Legislative Procedure; European Parliament; Council of the European Union; Unanimous Voting; Deciding by a Qualified Majority; Consent of the European Parliament; Lisabonská smlouva; Smlouva o fungování EU; řádný legislativní postup; zvláštní legislativní postup; Evropský parlament; Rada EU; jednomyslné rozhodování; rozhodování kvalifikovanou většinou; souhlas Evropského parlamentu;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F55 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - International Institutional Arrangements
    • K33 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - International Law
    • O52 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies - - - Europe

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prg:jnlsev:v:2014:y:2014:i:2:id:108:p:65-82. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stanislav Vojir (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/uevsecz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.