IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prg/jnlcbr/v2020y2020i5id250p25-44.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Perception of Business Risks by SMEs in the Czech Republic

Author

Listed:
  • Ján Dvorský
  • Ľudmila Kozubíková
  • Barbora Bacová

Abstract

This article aims to find out which business risks determine the perception of the business environment of small and medium-sized enterprises (SME) in the future. 454 SMEs from the Czech Republic participated in the case study by filling in an online questionnaire. Linear regression models were used to verify statistically significant causal relationships between selected indicators of business risks and respondents' perception of the future of business. The results show that selected indicators of the market, financial, personnel, legal and operational risk determine the perceived future of business. Strategic risk indicators do not significantly affect the perceived future of business. The most important indicators: market risk - adequacy of sales of products and services; financial risk - an indicator of the company's financial performance; personnel risk - an indicator of employees' initiative to increase performance; legal risk - an indicator of respondents' ability to understand the basic legal aspects and operational risk - an indicator of the use of company capacities. All the indicators from above have a positive effect on the future perception of the company. Implications for Central European audience: The attitudes of small and medium-sized enterprises represent a certain degree of subjectivity (human factor), which does not always reflect the real position of the enterprise. However, it is the main representatives of SMEs (owners and top managers) who try to manage business risks to have a more positive perception of their future in the business environment in the Czech Republic. The results based on the business environment of the Czech Republic are important not only for the owners of SMEs, but also for state and non-profit institutions dealing with various forms of SME support.

Suggested Citation

  • Ján Dvorský & Ľudmila Kozubíková & Barbora Bacová, 2020. "The Perception of Business Risks by SMEs in the Czech Republic," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2020(5), pages 25-44.
    • Handle: RePEc:prg:jnlcbr:v:2020:y:2020:i:5:id:250:p:25-44
    DOI: 10.18267/j.cebr.250
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://cebr.vse.cz/doi/10.18267/j.cebr.250.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://cebr.vse.cz/doi/10.18267/j.cebr.250.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.18267/j.cebr.250?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Beata Ślusarczyk & Katarzyna Grondys, 2019. "Parametric Conditions of High Financial Risk in the SME Sector," Risks, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-17, August.
    2. Schwab, Leila & Gold, Stefan & Reiner, Gerald, 2019. "Exploring financial sustainability of SMEs during periods of production growth: A simulation study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 8-18.
    3. Tomas Kliestik & Jaromir Vrbka & Zuzana Rowland, 2018. "Bankruptcy prediction in Visegrad group countries using multiple discriminant analysis," Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 13(3), pages 569-593, September.
    4. Armenia Androniceanu, 2017. "The Three-Dimensional Approach of Total Quality Management, an Essential Strategic Option for Business Excellence," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 19(44), pages 1-61, February.
    5. Premysl Pisar & Diana Bilkova, 2019. "Controlling as a tool for SME management with an emphasis on innovations in the context of Industry 4.0," Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 14(4), pages 763-785, December.
    6. Aleksandr Kljucnikov & Mehmet Civelek & Petr Cech & Jitka Kloudova, 2019. "Entrepreneurial orientation of SMEs’ executives in the comparative perspective for Czechia and Turkey," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 10(4), pages 773-795, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jan Dvorsky & Ludmila Kozubikova & Aleksandr Kljucnikov & Eva Ivanova, 2022. "Owners vs. Managers. Disparities of Attitudes on the Business Risk in SME Segment," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 24(59), pages 174-174.
    2. Rasha Fady Ismail & Fadi Safieddine & Rawad Hammad & Mazhar Hallak Kantakji, 2022. "Towards Sustainable Production Processes Reengineering: Case Study at INCOM Egypt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-25, May.
    3. Agnieszka A. Tubis & Katarzyna Grzybowska, 2022. "In Search of Industry 4.0 and Logistics 4.0 in Small-Medium Enterprises—A State of the Art Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-26, November.
    4. Mihaela Simionescu & Yuriy Bilan & Grzegorz Mentel, 2017. "Economic Effects of Migration from Poland to the UK," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 19(46), pages 757-757, August.
    5. Csaba FOGARASSY & Éva NEUBAUER & Hasan MANSUR & Anita TANGL & Judit OLÁH & József POPP, 2018. "The Main Transition Management Issues And The Effects Of Environmental Accounting On Financial Performance– With Focus On Cement Industry," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2018(31), pages 52-66, December.
    6. Sebastian Kot, 2018. "Sustainable Supply Chain Management in Small and Medium Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-19, April.
    7. Rugiubei Radu & Pînzaru Florina, 2022. "The digitalization of supply chain management in Romanian companies: an introductive research," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 16(1), pages 1295-1305, August.
    8. Beata Gavurova & Sylvia Jencova & Radovan Bacik & Marta Miskufova & Stanislav Letkovsky, 2022. "Artificial intelligence in predicting the bankruptcy of non-financial corporations," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 13(4), pages 1215-1251, December.
    9. Roman Vavrek & Ivana Kravčáková Vozárová & Rastislav Kotulič, 2021. "Evaluating the Financial Health of Agricultural Enterprises in the Conditions of the Slovak Republic Using Bankruptcy Models," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-19, March.
    10. Gheorghe H. Popescu & Elvira Nica & Florin Cristian Ciurlău & Mihaela Comănescu & Teodora Bițoiu, 2017. "Stabilizing Valences of an Optimum Monetary Zone in a Resilient Economy—Approaches and Limitations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-26, June.
    11. Dinesh Seth & Minhaj Ahemad A. Rehman, 2022. "Critical success factors‐based strategy to facilitate green manufacturing for responsible business: An application experience in Indian context," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7), pages 2786-2806, November.
    12. Ladislav Mura & Zuzana Hajduová, 2021. "Measuring efficiency by using selected determinants in regional SMEs," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 8(3), pages 487-503, March.
    13. Agus Nurudin, 2020. "Bankruptcy and Postponement of Debt Payments for Large Companies," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(2), pages 388-395.
    14. Aithal, Sreeramana, 2021. "Business Excellence through the Theory of Accountability," MPRA Paper 107894, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 15 May 2021.
    15. Žiga KOTNIK & Maja KLUN & Damjan ŠKULJ, 2017. "Performance Budgeting Model In The Environmental Perspective: Tackling Waste Pollution," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2017(29), pages 141-150, December.
    16. Jakub Horak & Petr Suler & Jaroslav Kollmann & Jan Marecek, 2020. "Credit Absorption Capacity of Businesses in the Construction Sector of the Czech Republic—Analysis Based on the Difference in Values of EVA Entity and EVA Equity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-16, October.
    17. Dewi Hanggraeni & Beata Ślusarczyk & Liyu Adhi Kasari Sulung & Athor Subroto, 2019. "The Impact of Internal, External and Enterprise Risk Management on the Performance of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-17, April.
    18. Adam Wisniewski, 2021. "The Link Between Business Relations and Success of an Organization: A Research Study," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 3), pages 521-535.
    19. Ren, Yi-Shuai & Ma, Chao-Qun & Chen, Xun-Qi & Lei, Yu-Tian & Wang, Yi-Ran, 2023. "Sustainable finance and blockchain: A systematic review and research agenda," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    20. Proho Mahir, 2023. "Going concern assessment: a literature review," Journal of Forensic Accounting Profession, Sciendo, vol. 3(2), pages 48-62, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    small and medium enterprises; future of business; business risks; Czech Republic;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill
    • L26 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Entrepreneurship
    • M21 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics - - - Business Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prg:jnlcbr:v:2020:y:2020:i:5:id:250:p:25-44. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stanislav Vojir (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/uevsecz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.