IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0265260.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Vulnerability assessment of freeway network considering the probabilities and consequences from a perspective based on network cascade failure

Author

Listed:
  • Jinqiang Xu
  • Hainan Huang
  • Yanqiu Cheng
  • Kuanmin Chen

Abstract

Freeway networks are vulnerable to natural disasters and man-made disruptions. The closure of one or more toll stations of the network often causes a sharp decrease in freeway performance. Therefore, measuring the probability and consequences of vulnerability to identify critical parts in the network is crucial for road emergency management. Most existing techniques only measure the consequences of node closure and rarely consider the probability of node closure owing to the lack of an extensive historical database; moreover, they ignore highways outside the study area, which can lead to errors in topological analysis and traffic distribution. Furthermore, the negative effects produced by the operation of freeway tunnels in vulnerability assessment have been neglected. In this study, a framework for freeway vulnerability assessment that considers both the probability and consequences of vulnerability is proposed, based on the perspective of network cascade failure analysis. The cascade failure analysis is conducted using an improved coupled map lattice model, developed by considering the negative effects of tunnels and optimizing the rules of local traffic redistribution. The perturbation threshold and propagation time step of network cascade failure are captured to reflect the probabilities and consequences of vulnerability. A nodal vulnerability index is established based on risk assessment, and a hierarchical clustering method is used to identify the vulnerability classification of critical nodes. The freeway network of Fuzhou in China is utilized to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach. Specifically, the toll stations in the study area are classified into five clusters of vulnerability: extremely high, high, medium, low, and extremely low. Approximately 31% of the toll stations were classified as the high or extremely high cluster, and three extremely vulnerable freeway sections requiring different precautions were identified. The proposed network vulnerability analysis method provides a new perspective to examine the vulnerability of freeway networks.

Suggested Citation

  • Jinqiang Xu & Hainan Huang & Yanqiu Cheng & Kuanmin Chen, 2022. "Vulnerability assessment of freeway network considering the probabilities and consequences from a perspective based on network cascade failure," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(3), pages 1-28, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0265260
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265260
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0265260
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0265260&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0265260?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. López, Fernando A. & Páez, Antonio & Carrasco, Juan A. & Ruminot, Natalia A., 2017. "Vulnerability of nodes under controlled network topology and flow autocorrelation conditions," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 77-87.
    2. Gao, Lei & Liu, Xingquan & Liu, Yu & Wang, Pu & Deng, Min & Zhu, Qing & Li, Haifeng, 2019. "Measuring road network topology vulnerability by Ricci curvature," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 527(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pan, Shouzheng & Yan, Hai & He, Jia & He, Zhengbing, 2021. "Vulnerability and resilience of transportation systems: A recent literature review," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 581(C).
    2. Xueguo Xu & Chen Xu & Wenxin Zhang, 2022. "Research on the Destruction Resistance of Giant Urban Rail Transit Network from the Perspective of Vulnerability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-26, June.
    3. Mo, Baichuan & Koutsopoulos, Haris N. & Zhao, Jinhua, 2022. "Inferring passenger responses to urban rail disruptions using smart card data: A probabilistic framework," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    4. Sarlas, Georgios & Páez, Antonio & Axhausen, Kay W., 2020. "Betweenness-accessibility: Estimating impacts of accessibility on networks," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    5. Li, Tao & Rong, Lili & Yan, Kesheng, 2019. "Vulnerability analysis and critical area identification of public transport system: A case of high-speed rail and air transport coupling system in China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 55-70.
    6. Tang, Junqing & Xu, Lei & Luo, Chunling & Ng, Tsan Sheng Adam, 2021. "Multi-disruption resilience assessment of rail transit systems with optimized commuter flows," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    7. Li, Tao & Rong, Lili, 2021. "Impacts of service feature on vulnerability analysis of high-speed rail network," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 238-253.
    8. Khaled Alawadi & Ngoc Hong Nguyen & Mariam Alkaabi, 2023. "The edge and the center in neighborhood planning units: assessing permeability and edge attractiveness in Abu Dhabi," Transportation, Springer, vol. 50(2), pages 677-705, April.
    9. Lu, Qing-Chang & Zhang, Lei & Xu, Peng-Cheng & Cui, Xin & Li, Jing, 2022. "Modeling network vulnerability of urban rail transit under cascading failures: A Coupled Map Lattices approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    10. Konstantinos Ntafloukas & Liliana Pasquale & Beatriz Martinez-Pastor & Daniel P. McCrum, 2023. "A Vulnerability Assessment Approach for Transportation Networks Subjected to Cyber–Physical Attacks," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-23, February.
    11. Lu, Qing-Chang & Xu, Peng-Cheng & Zhang, Jingxiao, 2021. "Infrastructure-based transportation network vulnerability modeling and analysis," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 584(C).
    12. Wang, Bi & Su, Qin & Chin, Kwai Sang, 2021. "Vulnerability assessment of China–Europe Railway Express multimodal transport network under cascading failures," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 584(C).
    13. Li, Tao & Rong, Lili, 2020. "A comprehensive method for the robustness assessment of high-speed rail network with operation data: A case in China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 666-681.
    14. Rodelia Sansano & Makoto Chikaraishi, 2022. "Exploring Natural and Social Factors Affecting Road Disruption Patterns and the Duration of Recovery: A Case from Hiroshima, Japan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-15, September.
    15. Johan Rose Santos & Nur Diana Safitri & Maya Safira & Varun Varghese & Makoto Chikaraishi, 2021. "Road network vulnerability and city-level characteristics: A nationwide comparative analysis of Japanese cities," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(5), pages 1091-1107, June.
    16. Tiong, Achara & Vergara, Hector A., 2023. "Evaluation of network expansion decisions for resilient interdependent critical infrastructures with different topologies," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 42(C).
    17. Lu, Qing-Chang, 2018. "Modeling network resilience of rail transit under operational incidents," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 227-237.
    18. Jiangang Shi & Shiping Wen & Xianbo Zhao & Guangdong Wu, 2019. "Sustainable Development of Urban Rail Transit Networks: A Vulnerability Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-24, March.
    19. He,Yiyi & Maruyama Rentschler,Jun Erik & Avner,Paolo & Gao,Jianxi & Yue,Xiangyu & Radke,John, 2022. "Mobility and Resilience : A Global Assessment of Flood Impacts on Road Transportation Networks," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10049, The World Bank.
    20. Wang, Zhaojing & Jia, Limin & Ma, Xiaoping & Sun, Xuehui & Tang, Qianxue & Qian, Sina, 2022. "Accessibility-oriented performance evaluation of high-speed railways using a three-layer network model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0265260. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.