IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0250224.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Acceptance of criteria for health and driver scoring in the general public in Germany

Author

Listed:
  • Felix G Rebitschek
  • Gerd Gigerenzer
  • Ariane Keitel
  • Sarah Sommer
  • Christian Groß
  • Gert G Wagner

Abstract

Numerous health insurers offer bonus programmes that score customers’ health behaviour, and car insurers offer telematics tariffs that score driving behaviour. In many countries, however, only a minority of customers participate in these programmes. In a population-representative survey of private households in Germany (N = 2,215), we study the acceptance of the criteria (features) on which the scoring programmes are based: the features for driver scoring (speed, texting while driving, time of driving, area of driving, accelerating and braking behaviour, respectively) and for health scoring (walking distance per day, sleeping hours per night, alcohol consumption, weight, participation in recommended cancer screenings, smoking status). In a second step, we model participants’ acceptance of both programmes with regard to the underlying feature acceptance. We find that insurers in Germany rarely use the features which the participants consider to be the most relevant and justifiable, that is, smoking status for health scoring and smartphone use for driver scoring. Heuristic models (fast-and-frugal trees) show that programme acceptance depends on the acceptance of a few features. These models can help to understand customers’ preferences and to design scoring programmes that are based on scientific evidence regarding behaviours and factors associated with good health and safe driving and are thus more likely to be accepted.

Suggested Citation

  • Felix G Rebitschek & Gerd Gigerenzer & Ariane Keitel & Sarah Sommer & Christian Groß & Gert G Wagner, 2021. "Acceptance of criteria for health and driver scoring in the general public in Germany," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(4), pages 1-14, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0250224
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250224
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0250224
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0250224&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0250224?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mercedes Ayuso & Montserrat Guillen & Jens Perch Nielsen, 2019. "Improving automobile insurance ratemaking using telematics: incorporating mileage and driver behaviour data," Transportation, Springer, vol. 46(3), pages 735-752, June.
    2. Stock, Stephanie & Schmidt, Harald & Büscher, Guido & Gerber, Andreas & Drabik, Anna & Graf, Christian & Lüngen, Markus & Stollenwerk, Björn, 2010. "Financial incentives in the German Statutory Health Insurance: New findings, new questions," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(1), pages 51-56, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shengkun Xie, 2021. "Improving Explainability of Major Risk Factors in Artificial Neural Networks for Auto Insurance Rate Regulation," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-21, July.
    2. Ramon Alemany & Catalina Bolancé & Roberto Rodrigo & Raluca Vernic, 2020. "Bivariate Mixed Poisson and Normal Generalised Linear Models with Sarmanov Dependence—An Application to Model Claim Frequency and Optimal Transformed Average Severity," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-18, December.
    3. Alfiero, Simona & Battisti, Enrico & Ηadjielias, Elias, 2022. "Black box technology, usage-based insurance, and prediction of purchase behavior: Evidence from the auto insurance sector," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    4. Ma, Yu-Luen & Zhu, Xiaoyu & Hu, Xianbiao & Chiu, Yi-Chang, 2018. "The use of context-sensitive insurance telematics data in auto insurance rate making," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 243-258.
    5. Martin Eling & Davide Nuessle & Julian Staubli, 2022. "The impact of artificial intelligence along the insurance value chain and on the insurability of risks," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 47(2), pages 205-241, April.
    6. Zifeng Zhao & Peng Shi & Xiaoping Feng, 2021. "Knowledge Learning of Insurance Risks Using Dependence Models," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 33(3), pages 1177-1196, July.
    7. Marjan Qazvini, 2019. "On the Validation of Claims with Excess Zeros in Liability Insurance: A Comparative Study," Risks, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-17, June.
    8. Francis Duval & Jean‐Philippe Boucher & Mathieu Pigeon, 2023. "Enhancing claim classification with feature extraction from anomaly‐detection‐derived routine and peculiarity profiles," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 90(2), pages 421-458, June.
    9. Sabine Witt & Reiner Leidl & Christian Becker & Rolf Holle & Michael Block & Johannes Brachmann & Sigmund Silber & Björn Stollenwerk, 2014. "The Effectiveness of the Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Programme ‘KardioPro’ Initiated by a German Sickness Fund: A Time-to-Event Analysis of Routine Data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(12), pages 1-17, December.
    10. Yanez, Juan Sebastian & Pigeon, Mathieu, 2021. "Micro-level parametric duration-frequency-severity modeling for outstanding claim payments," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 106-119.
    11. Jennifer S. K. Chan & S. T. Boris Choy & Udi Makov & Ariel Shamir & Vered Shapovalov, 2022. "Variable Selection Algorithm for a Mixture of Poisson Regression for Handling Overdispersion in Claims Frequency Modeling Using Telematics Car Driving Data," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-10, April.
    12. Miguel Santolino & Mercedes Ayuso, 2020. "Number and severity of BI victims, assuming dependence between vehicles involved in the crash," IREA Working Papers 202018, University of Barcelona, Research Institute of Applied Economics, revised Dec 2020.
    13. repec:zbw:rwirep:0373 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Donatella Porrini & Giulio Fusco & Cosimo Magazzino, 2020. "Black boxes and market efficiency: the effect on premiums in the Italian motor-vehicle insurance market," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 49(3), pages 455-472, June.
    15. Benjiang Ma & Qing Tang & Yifang Qin & Muhammad Farhan Bashir, 2021. "Policyholder cluster divergence based differential premium in diabetes insurance," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(7), pages 1793-1807, October.
    16. Manuela Alcañiz & Aïda Solé-Auró, 2018. "Ageing and health-related quality of life: evidence from Catalonia (Spain)," Working Papers 2018-01, Universitat de Barcelona, UB Riskcenter.
    17. Boris Augurzky & Arndt Reichert & Christoph M. Schmidt, 2012. "The Effect of a Bonus Program for Preventive Health Behavior on Health Expenditures," Ruhr Economic Papers 0373, Rheinisch-Westfälisches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Universität Dortmund, Universität Duisburg-Essen.
    18. Meng, Shengwang & Gao, Yaqian & Huang, Yifan, 2022. "Actuarial intelligence in auto insurance: Claim frequency modeling with driving behavior features and improved boosted trees," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 115-127.
    19. Marian Reiff & Erik Šoltés & Silvia Komara & Tatiana Šoltésová & Silvia Zelinová, 2022. "Segmentation and estimation of claim severity in motor third-party liability insurance through contrast analysis," Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 17(3), pages 803-842, September.
    20. Yiwen Zhou & Fengxiang Guo & Simin Wu & Wenyao He & Xuefei Xiong & Zheng Chen & Dingan Ni, 2022. "Safety and Economic Evaluations of Electric Public Buses Based on Driving Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-17, August.
    21. Banghee So & Jean-Philippe Boucher & Emiliano A. Valdez, 2021. "Synthetic Dataset Generation of Driver Telematics," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-19, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0250224. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.