IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0241503.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Survey of metaproteomics software tools for functional microbiome analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Ray Sajulga
  • Caleb Easterly
  • Michael Riffle
  • Bart Mesuere
  • Thilo Muth
  • Subina Mehta
  • Praveen Kumar
  • James Johnson
  • Bjoern Andreas Gruening
  • Henning Schiebenhoefer
  • Carolin A Kolmeder
  • Stephan Fuchs
  • Brook L Nunn
  • Joel Rudney
  • Timothy J Griffin
  • Pratik D Jagtap

Abstract

To gain a thorough appreciation of microbiome dynamics, researchers characterize the functional relevance of expressed microbial genes or proteins. This can be accomplished through metaproteomics, which characterizes the protein expression of microbiomes. Several software tools exist for analyzing microbiomes at the functional level by measuring their combined proteome-level response to environmental perturbations. In this survey, we explore the performance of six available tools, to enable researchers to make informed decisions regarding software choice based on their research goals. Tandem mass spectrometry-based proteomic data obtained from dental caries plaque samples grown with and without sucrose in paired biofilm reactors were used as representative data for this evaluation. Microbial peptides from one sample pair were identified by the X! tandem search algorithm via SearchGUI and subjected to functional analysis using software tools including eggNOG-mapper, MEGAN5, MetaGOmics, MetaProteomeAnalyzer (MPA), ProPHAnE, and Unipept to generate functional annotation through Gene Ontology (GO) terms. Among these software tools, notable differences in functional annotation were detected after comparing differentially expressed protein functional groups. Based on the generated GO terms of these tools we performed a peptide-level comparison to evaluate the quality of their functional annotations. A BLAST analysis against the NCBI non-redundant database revealed that the sensitivity and specificity of functional annotation varied between tools. For example, eggNOG-mapper mapped to the most number of GO terms, while Unipept generated more accurate GO terms. Based on our evaluation, metaproteomics researchers can choose the software according to their analytical needs and developers can use the resulting feedback to further optimize their algorithms. To make more of these tools accessible via scalable metaproteomics workflows, eggNOG-mapper and Unipept 4.0 were incorporated into the Galaxy platform.

Suggested Citation

  • Ray Sajulga & Caleb Easterly & Michael Riffle & Bart Mesuere & Thilo Muth & Subina Mehta & Praveen Kumar & James Johnson & Bjoern Andreas Gruening & Henning Schiebenhoefer & Carolin A Kolmeder & Steph, 2020. "Survey of metaproteomics software tools for functional microbiome analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-20, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0241503
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241503
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0241503
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0241503&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0241503?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Manuel Kleiner & Erin Thorson & Christine E. Sharp & Xiaoli Dong & Dan Liu & Carmen Li & Marc Strous, 2017. "Assessing species biomass contributions in microbial communities via metaproteomics," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 8(1), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Brian C. Searle & Lindsay K. Pino & Jarrett D. Egertson & Ying S. Ting & Robert T. Lawrence & Brendan X. MacLean & Judit Villén & Michael J. MacCoss, 2018. "Chromatogram libraries improve peptide detection and quantification by data independent acquisition mass spectrometry," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-12, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fengchao Yu & Guo Ci Teo & Andy T. Kong & Klemens Fröhlich & Ginny Xiaohe Li & Vadim Demichev & Alexey I. Nesvizhskii, 2023. "Analysis of DIA proteomics data using MSFragger-DIA and FragPipe computational platform," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Masaji Sakaguchi & Shota Okagawa & Yuma Okubo & Yuri Otsuka & Kazuki Fukuda & Motoyuki Igata & Tatsuya Kondo & Yoshifumi Sato & Tatsuya Yoshizawa & Takaichi Fukuda & Kazuya Yamagata & Weikang Cai & Yu, 2022. "Phosphatase protector alpha4 (α4) is involved in adipocyte maintenance and mitochondrial homeostasis through regulation of insulin signaling," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, December.
    3. Leyuan Li & Tong Wang & Zhibin Ning & Xu Zhang & James Butcher & Joeselle M. Serrana & Caitlin M. A. Simopoulos & Janice Mayne & Alain Stintzi & David R. Mack & Yang-Yu Liu & Daniel Figeys, 2023. "Revealing proteome-level functional redundancy in the human gut microbiome using ultra-deep metaproteomics," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    4. Zhi Huang & Gennifer E. Merrihew & Eric B. Larson & Jea Park & Deanna Plubell & Edward J. Fox & Kathleen S. Montine & Caitlin S. Latimer & C. Dirk Keene & James Y. Zou & Michael J. MacCoss & Thomas J., 2023. "Brain proteomic analysis implicates actin filament processes and injury response in resilience to Alzheimer’s disease," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    5. Digant Nayak & Dongwen Lv & Yaxia Yuan & Peiyi Zhang & Wanyi Hu & Anindita Nayak & Eliza A. Ruben & Zongyang Lv & Patrick Sung & Robert Hromas & Guangrong Zheng & Daohong Zhou & Shaun K. Olsen, 2024. "Development and crystal structures of a potent second-generation dual degrader of BCL-2 and BCL-xL," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    6. Marziah Hashimi & T. Andrew Sebrell & Jodi F. Hedges & Deann Snyder & Katrina N. Lyon & Stephanie D. Byrum & Samuel G. Mackintosh & Dan Crowley & Michelle D. Cherne & David Skwarchuk & Amanda Robison , 2023. "Antiviral responses in a Jamaican fruit bat intestinal organoid model of SARS-CoV-2 infection," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.
    7. Klemens Fröhlich & Eva Brombacher & Matthias Fahrner & Daniel Vogele & Lucas Kook & Niko Pinter & Peter Bronsert & Sylvia Timme-Bronsert & Alexander Schmidt & Katja Bärenfaller & Clemens Kreutz & Oliv, 2022. "Benchmarking of analysis strategies for data-independent acquisition proteomics using a large-scale dataset comprising inter-patient heterogeneity," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    8. Leah A. Owens & Sagan Friant & Bruno Martorelli Di Genova & Laura J. Knoll & Monica Contreras & Oscar Noya-Alarcon & Maria G. Dominguez-Bello & Tony L. Goldberg, 2024. "VESPA: an optimized protocol for accurate metabarcoding-based characterization of vertebrate eukaryotic endosymbiont and parasite assemblages," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.
    9. Valdemaras Petrosius & Pedro Aragon-Fernandez & Nil Üresin & Gergo Kovacs & Teeradon Phlairaharn & Benjamin Furtwängler & Jeff Op De Beeck & Sarah L. Skovbakke & Steffen Goletz & Simon Francis Thomsen, 2023. "Exploration of cell state heterogeneity using single-cell proteomics through sensitivity-tailored data-independent acquisition," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0241503. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.