IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0239669.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Testing “efficient supply chain propositions” using topological characterization of the global supply chain network

Author

Listed:
  • Abhijit Chakraborty
  • Yuichi Ikeda

Abstract

In this paper, we study the topological properties of the global supply chain network in terms of its degree distribution, clustering coefficient, degree-degree correlation, bow-tie structure, and community structure to test the efficient supply chain propositions proposed by E. J.S. Hearnshaw et al. The global supply chain data in the year 2017 are constructed by collecting various company data from the web site of Standard & Poor’s Capital IQ platform. The in- and out-degree distributions are characterized by a power law of the form of γin = 2.42 and γout = 2.11. The clustering coefficient decays 〈 C ( k ) 〉 ∼ k - β k with an exponent βk = 0.46. The nodal degree-degree correlations 〈knn(k)〉 indicates the absence of assortativity. The bow-tie structure of giant weakly connected component (GWCC) reveals that the OUT component is the largest and consists 41.1% of all firms. The giant strong connected component (GSCC) is comprised of 16.4% of all firms. We observe that upstream or downstream firms are located a few steps away from the GSCC. Furthermore, we uncover the community structures of the network and characterize them according to their location and industry classification. We observe that the largest community consists of the consumer discretionary sector based mainly in the United States (US). These firms belong to the OUT component in the bow-tie structure of the global supply chain network. Finally, we confirm the validity of Hearnshaw et al.’s efficient supply chain propositions, namely Proposition S1 (short path length), Proposition S2 (power-law degree distribution), Proposition S3 (high clustering coefficient), Proposition S4 (“fit-gets-richer” growth mechanism), Proposition S5 (truncation of power-law degree distribution), and Proposition S7 (community structure with overlapping boundaries) regarding the global supply chain network. While the original propositions S1 just mentioned a short path length, we found the short path from the GSCC to IN and OUT by analyzing the bow-tie structure. Therefore, the short path length in the bow-tie structure is a conceptual addition to the original propositions of Hearnshaw.

Suggested Citation

  • Abhijit Chakraborty & Yuichi Ikeda, 2020. "Testing “efficient supply chain propositions” using topological characterization of the global supply chain network," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(10), pages 1-18, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0239669
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239669
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0239669
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0239669&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0239669?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mizuno, Takayuki & Ohnishi, Takaaki & Watanabe, Tsutomu, 2016. "Structure of global buyer-supplier networks and its implications for conflict minerals regulations," HIT-REFINED Working Paper Series 38, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    2. Tang, Liang & Jing, Ke & He, Jie & Stanley, H. Eugene, 2016. "Complex interdependent supply chain networks: Cascading failure and robustness," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 443(C), pages 58-69.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xing Chen & Eunmi Jang, 2022. "A Sustainable Supply Chain Network Model Considering Carbon Neutrality and Personalization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-23, April.
    2. Hempfing, Alexander & Mundt, Philipp, 2022. "Tie formation in global production chains," BERG Working Paper Series 181, Bamberg University, Bamberg Economic Research Group.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hayato Goto & Eduardo Viegas & Hideki Takayasu & Misako Takayasu & Henrik Jeldtoft Jensen, 2019. "Dynamics of essential interaction between firms on financial reports," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(12), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Tang, Liang & Jing, Ke & He, Jie & Stanley, H. Eugene, 2016. "Robustness of assembly supply chain networks by considering risk propagation and cascading failure," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 459(C), pages 129-139.
    3. X. Zhang & L. D. Valdez & H. E. Stanley & L. A. Braunstein, 2019. "Modeling Risk Contagion in the Venture Capital Market: A Multilayer Network Approach," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-11, December.
    4. Yang, Qihui & Scoglio, Caterina M. & Gruenbacher, Don M., 2021. "Robustness of supply chain networks against underload cascading failures," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 563(C).
    5. Wang, Yingcong & Xiao, Renbin, 2016. "An ant colony based resilience approach to cascading failures in cluster supply network," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 462(C), pages 150-166.
    6. Yuhao Wang & Jiaxian Shen & Jinnan Pan & Tingqiang Chen, 2022. "A Credit Risk Contagion Intensity Model of Supply Chain Enterprises under Different Credit Modes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-26, October.
    7. Fang, Yinhai & Xu, Haiyan & Perc, Matjaž & Tan, Qingmei, 2019. "Dynamic evolution of economic networks under the influence of mergers and divestitures," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 524(C), pages 89-99.
    8. Tingqiang Chen & Yuejuan Hou & Lei Wang & Zeyu Li, 2023. "Counterparty Risk Contagion Model of Carbon Quota Based on Asset Price Reduction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-35, July.
    9. Li, Ruimeng & Yang, Naiding & Zhang, Yanlu & Liu, Hui & Zhang, Mingzhen, 2021. "Impacts of module–module aligned patterns on risk cascading propagation in complex product development (CPD) interdependent networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 564(C).
    10. Matthew Elliott & Benjamin Golub & Matthew V. Leduc, 2022. "Supply Network Formation and Fragility," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 112(8), pages 2701-2747, August.
    11. Shi, Xiaoqiu & Long, Wei & Li, Yanyan & Deng, Dingshan, 2022. "Robustness of interdependent supply chain networks against both functional and structural cascading failures," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 586(C).
    12. Jing, Ke & Du, Xinru & Shen, Lixin & Tang, Liang, 2019. "Robustness of complex networks: Cascading failure mechanism by considering the characteristics of time delay and recovery strategy," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 534(C).
    13. Dong, Shangjia & Wang, Haizhong & Mostafizi, Alireza & Song, Xuan, 2020. "A network-of-networks percolation analysis of cascading failures in spatially co-located road-sewer infrastructure networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 538(C).
    14. Manupati, V.K. & Schoenherr, Tobias & Ramkumar, M. & Panigrahi, Suraj & Sharma, Yash & Mishra, Prakriti, 2022. "Recovery strategies for a disrupted supply chain network: Leveraging blockchain technology in pre- and post-disruption scenarios," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    15. Jiang, Yuan & Yan, Yuwei & Hong, Cheng & Yang, Songqing & Yu, Rongbin & Dai, Jiyang, 2022. "Multidirectional recovery strategy against failure," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    16. Dirzka, Christopher & Acciaro, Michele, 2022. "Global shipping network dynamics during the COVID-19 pandemic's initial phases," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    17. Johnson, Caroline A. & Flage, Roger & Guikema, Seth D., 2019. "Characterising the robustness of coupled power-law networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    18. Dmitry Ivanov, 2017. "Simulation-based ripple effect modelling in the supply chain," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(7), pages 2083-2101, April.
    19. Aymeric Vié & Alfredo J. Morales, 2021. "How Connected is Too Connected? Impact of Network Topology on Systemic Risk and Collapse of Complex Economic Systems," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 57(4), pages 1327-1351, April.
    20. Ivanov, Dmitry & Dolgui, Alexandre, 2021. "OR-methods for coping with the ripple effect in supply chains during COVID-19 pandemic: Managerial insights and research implications," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0239669. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.