IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0222593.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Validation of the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care Measurement Tools (RMIC-MTs) in renal care for patient and care providers

Author

Listed:
  • Pim P Valentijn
  • Fernando Pereira
  • Christina W Sterner
  • Hubertus J M Vrijhoef
  • Dirk Ruwaard
  • Jörgen Hegbrant
  • Giovanni F M Strippoli

Abstract

Introduction: Integrated service delivery is considered to be an essential condition for improving the management and health outcomes of people with chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, research on the assessment of integrated care by patients and care providers is hindered by the absence of brief, reliable, and valid measurement tools. Objective: The aim of this study was to develop survey instruments for healthcare professionals and patients based on the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care (RMIC), and to evaluate their psychometric properties. Design: The development process was based on the US Food and Drug Administration guidelines. This included item generation from systematic reviews of existing tools and expert opinion on clarity and content validity, involving renal care providers and chronic kidney patients. A cross-sectional, multi-centre design was used to test for internal consistency and construct validity. Setting: Outpatient clinics in a large renal network. Participants: A sample of 30.788 CKD patients, and 8.914 renal care providers. Methods and analysis: Both survey instruments were developed using previous qualitative work and published literature. A multidisciplinary expert panel assessed the face and content validity of both instruments and following a pilot study, the psychometric properties of both instruments were explored. Exploratory factor analysis with principal axis factoring and with promax rotation was used to assess the underlying dimensions of both instruments; Cronbach’s alpha was used to determine the internal constancy reliability. Results: 17.512 patients (response rate: 56.9%) and 8.849 care providers (response rate: 69.5%) responded to the questionnaires. Factor analysis of the patient questionnaire yielded three internally consistent (Cronbach’s alpha > 0.7) factors: person-centeredness, clinical coordination, and professional coordination. Factor analysis of the provider questionnaire produced eight internally consistent (Cronbach’s alpha > 0.7) factors: person-centeredness, community centeredness, clinical coordination, professional coordination, organisational coordination, system coordination, technical and cultural competence. As hypothesised, care coordination patient and providers scores significantly correlated with questions about quality of care, treatment involvement, reported health, clinics’ organisational readiness, and external care coordination capacity. Conclusion: This study provides evidence for the reliability and validity of the RMIC patient and provider questionnaires as generic tools to assess the experience with or perception of integrated renal care delivery. The instruments are recommended in future applications testing test-retest reliability, convergent and predictive validity, and responsiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Pim P Valentijn & Fernando Pereira & Christina W Sterner & Hubertus J M Vrijhoef & Dirk Ruwaard & Jörgen Hegbrant & Giovanni F M Strippoli, 2019. "Validation of the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care Measurement Tools (RMIC-MTs) in renal care for patient and care providers," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(9), pages 1-21, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0222593
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222593
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0222593
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0222593&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0222593?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wensing, Michel & Grol, Richard & Smits, Anton, 1994. "Quality judgements by patients on general practice care: A literature analysis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 45-53, January.
    2. Nathan R Hill & Samuel T Fatoba & Jason L Oke & Jennifer A Hirst & Christopher A O’Callaghan & Daniel S Lasserson & F D Richard Hobbs, 2016. "Global Prevalence of Chronic Kidney Disease – A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(7), pages 1-18, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Colombani, Françoise & Encrenaz, Gaëlle & Sibé, Matthieu & Quintard, Bruno & Ravaud, Alain & Saillour-Glénisson, Florence, 2022. "Development of an evidence-based reference framework for care coordination with a focus on the micro level of integrated care: A mixed method design study combining scoping review of reviews and nomin," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(3), pages 245-261.
    2. Roberto Latina & Katia Salomone & Daniela D’Angelo & Daniela Coclite & Greta Castellini & Silvia Gianola & Alice Fauci & Antonello Napoletano & Laura Iacorossi & Primiano Iannone, 2020. "Towards a New System for the Assessment of the Quality in Care Pathways: An Overview of Systematic Reviews," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-16, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gabriela Ortiz, 2023. "New meta-analysis (MA) features in Stata 18: MA for prevalence and multilevel MA," Canadian Stata Conference 2023 06, Stata Users Group.
    2. William P Martin & Neil G Docherty & Carel W Le Roux, 2017. "Bariatric Surgery for the Treatment of Diabetic Kidney Disease," Current Research in Diabetes & Obesity Journal, Juniper Publishers Inc., vol. 3(5), pages 1-4, August.
    3. V Boima & K Agyabeng & V Ganu & D Dey & E Yorke & M B Amissah-Arthur & A A Wilson & A E Yawson & C C Mate-Kole & J Nonvignon, 2020. "Willingness to pay for kidney transplantation among chronic kidney disease patients in Ghana," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(12), pages 1-15, December.
    4. Christian T. Litchepah & Issidor. Noumba & Mohammadou. Nourou, 2022. "Does reducing violence against women improve children’s health? The case of Cameroon," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 6(6), pages 187-194, June.
    5. Qingqing Cai & Louise H Dekker & Stephan J L Bakker & Martin H de Borst & Gerjan Navis, 2019. "Intraregional differences in renal function in the Northern Netherlands: The Lifelines Cohort Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-15, October.
    6. John Pastor Ansah & Shawn Tan Yi Wei & Tessa Lui Shi Min, 2020. "An evaluation of the impact of aggressive diabetes and hypertension management on chronic kidney diseases at the population level: a simulation analysis," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 36(4), pages 497-522, October.
    7. Hayfa Almutary & Nahla Tayyib, 2021. "Translation, Adaptation, and Validation of Chronic Kidney Disease Self-Management and Knowledge Instruments for People at Pre-Dialysis Stage in the Arab World," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 30(8), pages 1231-1240, November.
    8. Don O’Mahony & Sikhumbuzo A. Mabunda & Mbulelo Mntonintshi & Joshua Iruedo & Ramprakash Kaswa & Ernesto Blanco-Blanco & Basil Ogunsanwo & Kakia Anne Faith Namugenyi & Sandeep Vasaikar & Parimalaranie , 2023. "Causes of Moderate and Severe Anaemia in a High-HIV and TB-Prevalent Adult Population in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-17, February.
    9. Nisith Kumar Mohanty & Krushna Chandra Sahoo & Sanghamitra Pati & Asish K. Sahu & Reena Mohanty, 2020. "Prevalence of Chronic Kidney Disease in Cuttack District of Odisha, India," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-8, January.
    10. William P Martin & Neil G Docherty & Carel W Le Roux, 2017. "Bariatric Surgery for the Treatment of Diabetic Kidney Disease," Current Research in Diabetes & Obesity Journal, Juniper Publishers Inc., vol. 3(5), pages 90-93, August.
    11. Gabriela Maria Reis Goncalves & Everton Nunes da Silva, 2018. "Cost of chronic kidney disease attributable to diabetes from the perspective of the Brazilian Unified Health System," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-15, October.
    12. Jing Zeng & Miao Liu & Lei Wu & Jianhua Wang & Shanshan Yang & Yiyan Wang & Yao Yao & Bin Jiang & Yao He, 2016. "The Association of Hypertriglyceridemic Waist Phenotype with Chronic Kidney Disease and Its Sex Difference: A Cross-Sectional Study in an Urban Chinese Elderly Population," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-10, December.
    13. Pongpan Suriyong & Chidchanok Ruengorn & Chairat Shayakul & Puree Anantachoti & Penkarn Kanjanarat, 2022. "Prevalence of chronic kidney disease stages 3–5 in low- and middle-income countries in Asia: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(2), pages 1-18, February.
    14. Kamolpat Chaiyakittisopon & Oraluck Pattanaprateep & Narisa Ruenroengbun & Tunlanut Sapankaew & Atiporn Ingsathit & Gareth J. Mckay & John Attia & Ammarin Thakkinstian, 2021. "Evaluation of the cost-utility of phosphate binders as a treatment option for hyperphosphatemia in chronic kidney disease patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the economic evaluations," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 22(4), pages 571-584, June.
    15. Kuan Y. Chang & I-Wen Wu & Bo-Ruei Huang & Jih-Gau Juang & Jia-Chyi Wu & Su-Wei Chang & Chung Cheng Chang, 2018. "Associations between Water Quality Measures and Chronic Kidney Disease Prevalence in Taiwan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-15, December.
    16. John Pastor Ansah & Keith Low Sheng Hng & Salman Ahmad & Cheryl Goh, 2021. "Evaluating the impact of upstream and downstream interventions on chronic kidney disease and dialysis care: a simulation analysis," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 37(1), pages 32-58, January.
    17. Alexandra-Elena Marin & Rosa Redolat & José-Antonio Gil-Gómez & Patricia Mesa-Gresa, 2023. "Addressing Cognitive Function and Psychological Well-Being in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review on the Use of Technology-Based Interventions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-21, February.
    18. Po-Jen Hsiao & Chih-Chien Chiu & Dung-Jang Tsai & Pi-Shao Ko & Ying-Kai Chen & Hao Cheng & Wen Su & Kuo-Cheng Lu & Sui-Lung Su, 2021. "Association between nitric oxide synthase T-786C genetic polymorphism and chronic kidney disease: Meta-analysis incorporating trial sequential analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(10), pages 1-16, October.
    19. Najwa Abdulwahed Al Bastaki & Mohamud Sheek-Hussein & Ankita Shukla & Najlaa Al-Bluwi & Basema Saddik, 2022. "An Evaluation of Non-Communicable Diseases and Risk Factors Associated with COVID-19 Disease Severity in Dubai, United Arab Emirates: An Observational Retrospective Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-14, November.
    20. Theodore Vassilikopoulos & Athena Kalokairinou & Georgia Kourlaba & Eirini Grapsa, 2021. "Evaluation of Pupils’ Knowledge about Kidney Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-10, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0222593. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.