IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0219728.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Personalized prediction of adverse heart and kidney events using baseline and longitudinal data from SPRINT and ACCORD

Author

Listed:
  • Gal Dinstag
  • David Amar
  • Erik Ingelsson
  • Euan Ashley
  • Ron Shamir

Abstract

Background: The 2017 guidelines of the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association propose substantial changes to hypertension management. The guidelines lower the blood pressure threshold defining hypertension and promote more aggressive treatments. Thus, more individuals are now classified as hypertensive and as a result, medication usage may become more extensive. An inevitable byproduct of greater medication use is higher incidence of adverse effects. Here, we examined these issues by developing models that predict both cardiovascular events and other adverse events based on the treatment chosen and other patient’s data. Methods and results: We used data from the SPRINT trial to produce patient-specific predictions of the risks for adverse cardiovascular or kidney outcomes. Unlike prior models, we used both the baseline characteristics collected upon recruitment and the longitudinal data during the follow-up. Importantly, our cardiovascular predictor outperformed extant models on SPRINT participants, achieving AUC = 0.765, and was validated with good performance in an independent cohort of the ACCORD trial. Conclusions: Our study illustrates the importance of including longitudinal data for assessing personalized risk and provides means for recommending personalized treatment decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Gal Dinstag & David Amar & Erik Ingelsson & Euan Ashley & Ron Shamir, 2019. "Personalized prediction of adverse heart and kidney events using baseline and longitudinal data from SPRINT and ACCORD," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(8), pages 1-12, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0219728
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219728
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0219728
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0219728&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0219728?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Friedman, Jerome H. & Hastie, Trevor & Tibshirani, Rob, 2010. "Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 33(i01).
    2. Sanjay Basu & Jeremy B Sussman & Joseph Rigdon & Lauren Steimle & Brian T Denton & Rodney A Hayward, 2017. "Benefit and harm of intensive blood pressure treatment: Derivation and validation of risk models using data from the SPRINT and ACCORD trials," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-26, October.
    3. Simon, Noah & Friedman, Jerome H. & Hastie, Trevor & Tibshirani, Rob, 2011. "Regularization Paths for Cox's Proportional Hazards Model via Coordinate Descent," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 39(i05).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andreas D. Meid & Lucas Wirbka, 2022. "Can Machine Learning from Real-World Data Support Drug Treatment Decisions? A Prediction Modeling Case for Direct Oral Anticoagulants," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 42(5), pages 587-598, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Benedicte Sjo Tislevoll & Monica Hellesøy & Oda Helen Eck Fagerholt & Stein-Erik Gullaksen & Aashish Srivastava & Even Birkeland & Dimitrios Kleftogiannis & Pilar Ayuda-Durán & Laure Piechaczyk & Dagi, 2023. "Early response evaluation by single cell signaling profiling in acute myeloid leukemia," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, December.
    2. Matthew F Dixon, 2017. "A High Frequency Trade Execution Model for Supervised Learning," Papers 1710.03870, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2017.
    3. Zhixuan Fu & Shuangge Ma & Haiqun Lin & Chirag R. Parikh & Bingqing Zhou, 2017. "Penalized Variable Selection for Multi-center Competing Risks Data," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 9(2), pages 379-405, December.
    4. Andreas Groll & Gerhard Tutz, 2017. "Variable selection in discrete survival models including heterogeneity," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 305-338, April.
    5. Matthew F Dixon, 2017. "Sequence Classification of the Limit Order Book using Recurrent Neural Networks," Papers 1707.05642, arXiv.org.
    6. Jie Xiong & Zhitong Bing & Yanlin Su & Defeng Deng & Xiaoning Peng, 2014. "An Integrated mRNA and microRNA Expression Signature for Glioblastoma Multiforme Prognosis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(5), pages 1-8, May.
    7. Liao Zhu & Robert A. Jarrow & Martin T. Wells, 2021. "Time-Invariance Coefficients Tests with the Adaptive Multi-Factor Model," Quarterly Journal of Finance (QJF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 11(04), pages 1-30, December.
    8. Shengzhi Huang & Jiajia Qian & Yong Huang & Wei Lu & Yi Bu & Jinqing Yang & Qikai Cheng, 2022. "Disclosing the relationship between citation structure and future impact of a publication," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(7), pages 1025-1042, July.
    9. Shikhar Uttam & Andrew M. Stern & Christopher J. Sevinsky & Samantha Furman & Filippo Pullara & Daniel Spagnolo & Luong Nguyen & Albert Gough & Fiona Ginty & D. Lansing Taylor & S. Chakra Chennubhotla, 2020. "Spatial domain analysis predicts risk of colorectal cancer recurrence and infers associated tumor microenvironment networks," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.
    10. Liao Zhu, 2021. "The Adaptive Multi-Factor Model and the Financial Market," Papers 2107.14410, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2021.
    11. Kou Fujimori, 2022. "The variable selection by the Dantzig selector for Cox’s proportional hazards model," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 74(3), pages 515-537, June.
    12. Jacek Bia{l}ek & Maciej Berk{e}sewicz, 2020. "Scanner data in inflation measurement: from raw data to price indices," Papers 2005.11233, arXiv.org.
    13. Liao Zhu & Sumanta Basu & Robert A. Jarrow & Martin T. Wells, 2020. "High-Dimensional Estimation, Basis Assets, and the Adaptive Multi-Factor Model," Quarterly Journal of Finance (QJF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 10(04), pages 1-52, December.
    14. Wu, Tong Tong & He, Xin, 2012. "Coordinate ascent for penalized semiparametric regression on high-dimensional panel count data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 25-33, January.
    15. Marton Gosztonyi, 2023. "Comparative Analysis of X-Y-Z Generation Entrepreneurs in a Semi-Peripheral EU Member Country: Insights from Regularized Regression Techniques," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 191-217.
    16. Yoonsuh Jung, 2018. "Multiple predicting K-fold cross-validation for model selection," Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(1), pages 197-215, January.
    17. Zhixuan Fu & Chirag R. Parikh & Bingqing Zhou, 2017. "Penalized variable selection in competing risks regression," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 353-376, July.
    18. Li, Libo, 2018. "Predicting online invitation responses with a competing risk model using privacy-friendly social event data," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 270(2), pages 698-708.
    19. Andreea L. Erciulescu & Jean D. Opsomer, 2022. "A model‐based approach to predict employee compensation components," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 71(5), pages 1503-1520, November.
    20. Tutz, Gerhard & Pößnecker, Wolfgang & Uhlmann, Lorenz, 2015. "Variable selection in general multinomial logit models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 207-222.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0219728. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.