IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0218712.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An ecological approach to monitor geographic disparities in cancer outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Jinani Jayasekera
  • Eberechukwu Onukwugha
  • Christopher Cadham
  • Donna Harrington
  • Sarah Tom
  • Francoise Pradel
  • Michael Naslund

Abstract

Background: Area-level indices are widely used to assess the impact of socio-environmental characteristics on cancer outcomes. While area-level measures of socioeconomic status (SES) have been previously used in cancer settings, fewer studies have focused on evaluating the impact of area-level health services supply (HSS) characteristics on cancer outcomes. Moreover, there is significant variation in the methods and constructs used to create area-level indices. Methods: In this study, we introduced a psychometrically-induced, reproducible approach to develop area-level HSS and SES indices. We assessed the utility of these indices in detecting the effects of area-level characteristics on prostate, breast, and lung cancer incidence and stage at diagnosis in the US. The information on county-level SES and HSS characteristics were extracted from US Census, County Business Patterns data and Area Health Resource Files. The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was used to identify individuals diagnosed with cancer from 2010 to 2012. SES and HSS indices were developed and linked to 3-year age-adjusted cancer incidence rates. SES and HSS indices empirically summarized the level of employment, education, poverty and income, and the availability of health care facilities and health professionals within counties. Results: SES and HSS models demonstrated good fit (TLI = 0.98 and 0.96, respectively) and internal consistency (alpha = 0.85 and 0.95, respectively). Increasing SES and HSS were associated with increasing prostate and breast cancer and decreasing lung cancer incidence rates. The results varied by stage at diagnosis and race. Conclusion: Composite county-level measures of SES and HSS were effective in ranking counties and detecting gradients in cancer incidence and stage at diagnosis. Thus, these measures provide valuable tools for monitoring geographic disparities in cancer outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Jinani Jayasekera & Eberechukwu Onukwugha & Christopher Cadham & Donna Harrington & Sarah Tom & Francoise Pradel & Michael Naslund, 2019. "An ecological approach to monitor geographic disparities in cancer outcomes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(6), pages 1-14, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0218712
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218712
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0218712
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0218712&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0218712?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Krieger, N., 1992. "Overcoming the absence of socioeconomic data in medical records: Validation and application of a census-based methodology," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 82(5), pages 703-710.
    2. Robin Yabroff, K. & Gordis, Leon, 2003. "Does stage at diagnosis influence the observed relationship between socioeconomic status and breast cancer incidence, case-fatality, and mortality?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 57(12), pages 2265-2279, December.
    3. Crabbe, J.C.F. & Gregorio, D.I. & Samociuk, H. & Swede, H., 2015. "Secular trends, race, and geographic disparity of early-stage breast cancer incidence: 25 years of surveillance in Connecticut," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 105, pages 64-70.
    4. Saldana-Ruiz, N. & Clouston, S.A.P. & Rubin, M.S. & Colen, C.G. & Link, B.G., 2013. "Fundamental causes of colorectal cancer mortality in the United States: Understanding the importance of socioeconomic status in creating inequality in mortality," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 103(1), pages 99-104.
    5. Oakes, J. Michael & Rossi, Peter H., 2003. "The measurement of SES in health research: current practice and steps toward a new approach," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 56(4), pages 769-784, February.
    6. Rubin, Marcie S. & Clouston, Sean & Link, Bruce G., 2014. "A fundamental cause approach to the study of disparities in lung cancer and pancreatic cancer mortality in the United States," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 54-61.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sean A. P. Clouston & Marcie S. Rubin & Jo C. Phelan & Bruce G. Link, 2016. "A Social History of Disease: Contextualizing the Rise and Fall of Social Inequalities in Cause-Specific Mortality," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 53(5), pages 1631-1656, October.
    2. Clouston, Sean A.P. & Rubin, Marcie S. & Chae, David H. & Freese, Jeremy & Nemesure, Barbara & Link, Bruce G., 2017. "Fundamental causes of accelerated declines in colorectal cancer mortality: Modeling multiple ways that disadvantage influences mortality risk," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 1-10.
    3. Hoeck, Sarah & François, Guido & Van der Heyden, Johan & Geerts, Joanna & Van Hal, Guido, 2011. "Healthcare utilisation among the Belgian elderly in relation to their socio-economic status," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(2), pages 174-182, February.
    4. David Yoon Kin Tong & Chau Keng Tee & Hishamuddin Ismail, 2016. "Developing the Profile of Green Consumer and Family Decision Making Model: A Review," Journal of Emerging Trends in Marketing and Management, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 1(1), pages 282-291, September.
    5. Isabelle Roskam & Jean-Christophe Meunier & Marie Stievenart, 2015. "From Parents to Siblings and Peers," SAGE Open, , vol. 5(4), pages 21582440156, October.
    6. Aue, Katja & Roosen, Jutta, 2010. "Poverty and health behaviour: Comparing socioeconomic status and a combined poverty indicator as a determinant of health behaviour," 115th Joint EAAE/AAEA Seminar, September 15-17, 2010, Freising-Weihenstephan, Germany 116401, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    7. Shoham, David A. & Vupputuri, Suma & Kaufman, Jay S. & Kshirsagar, Abhijit V. & Diez Roux, Ana V. & Coresh, Josef & Heiss, Gerardo, 2008. "Kidney disease and the cumulative burden of life course socioeconomic conditions: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(8), pages 1311-1320, October.
    8. Cots, Francesc & Mercade, Lluc & Castells, Xavier & Salvador, Xavier, 2004. "Relationship between hospital structural level and length of stay outliers: Implications for hospital payment systems," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(2), pages 159-168, May.
    9. Jane Iloanya & Emmanuel Zhanda & Asitha Kodippili, 2023. "Multilevel Analysis of Student and School Variables Responsible for the Differentials in Mathematics Achievement: Evidence from the TIMMS 2015-Botswana," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(7), pages 1150-1163, July.
    10. Martin Gaechter & Peter Schwazer & Engelbert Theurl, 2012. "Stronger Sex but Earlier Death: A Multi-level Socioeconomic Analysis of Gender Differences in Mortality in Austria," DANUBE: Law and Economics Review, European Association Comenius - EACO, issue 1, pages 1-23, March.
    11. Szanton, Sarah L. & Thorpe, Roland J. & Whitfield, Keith, 2010. "Life-course financial strain and health in African-Americans," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(2), pages 259-265, July.
    12. Mejía-Guevara, Iván, 2015. "Economic inequality and intergenerational transfers: Evidence from Mexico," The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, Elsevier, vol. 5(C), pages 23-32.
    13. William Boyce & Torbjorn Torsheim & Candace Currie & Alessio Zambon, 2006. "The Family Affluence Scale as a Measure of National Wealth: Validation of an Adolescent Self-Report Measure," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 78(3), pages 473-487, September.
    14. Michelle Sholzberg & Tara Gomes & David N Juurlink & Zhan Yao & Muhammad M Mamdani & Andreas Laupacis, 2016. "The Influence of Socioeconomic Status on Selection of Anticoagulation for Atrial Fibrillation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(2), pages 1-12, February.
    15. Rabia Khalaila, 2016. "Depression statuses and related predictors in later life: A 10-year follow-up study in Israel," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 13(4), pages 311-321, December.
    16. Martin Korndörfer & Boris Egloff & Stefan C. Schmukle, 2015. "A Large Scale Test of the Effect of Social Class on Prosocial Behavior," Working Papers 1601, Gutenberg School of Management and Economics, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz.
    17. Schulz, Jan & Mayerhoffer, Daniel M., 2021. "A network approach to consumption," BERG Working Paper Series 173, Bamberg University, Bamberg Economic Research Group.
    18. Angelo d’Errico & Fulvio Ricceri & Silvia Stringhini & Cristian Carmeli & Mika Kivimaki & Mel Bartley & Cathal McCrory & Murielle Bochud & Peter Vollenweider & Rosario Tumino & Marcel Goldberg & Marie, 2017. "Socioeconomic indicators in epidemiologic research: A practical example from the LIFEPATH study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(5), pages 1-32, May.
    19. Jason R. D. Rarick & Carly Tubbs Dolan & Wen‐Jui Han & Jun Wen, 2018. "Relations Between Socioeconomic Status, Subjective Social Status, and Health in Shanghai, China," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 99(1), pages 390-405, March.
    20. Fujishiro, Kaori & Xu, Jun & Gong, Fang, 2010. "What does "occupation" represent as an indicator of socioeconomic status?: Exploring occupational prestige and health," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(12), pages 2100-2107, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0218712. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.