IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0201701.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Psychometric properties of a new intake questionnaire for visually impaired young adults: The Participation and Activity Inventory for Young Adults (PAI-YA)

Author

Listed:
  • Ellen Bernadette Maria Elsman
  • Gerardus Hermanus Maria Bartholomeus van Rens
  • Ruth Marie Antoinette van Nispen

Abstract

Background: To be able to identify and monitor personal needs and goals of visually impaired young adults before and during rehabilitation trajectories, the Participation and Activity for Young Adults (PAI-YA) was developed involving young adults (18–25 years) and professionals as stakeholders. The psychometric properties of this new patient-reported outcome measure were investigated in order to develop an improved version. Methods: Young adults registered at two low vision rehabilitation centers in the Netherlands were invited to complete the 141-item PAI-YA (n = 186) in a test-retest design. To select the best items for the PAI-YA, response frequencies were assessed and a graded response model (GRM) was fitted. Item reduction was informed by response frequencies, insufficient item information, and participants’ comments. Fit indices, item and person (theta) parameters were computed, after which known-group validity, concurrent validity, test-retest reliability and feasibility were studied. Results: Response frequencies, violation of assumptions and item information informed the elimination of 81 items, resulting in a unidimensional PAI-YA showing satisfactory fit to the GRM. Known-group validity showed significant differences for visual impairment, financial situation, sex, educational situation and employment situation. Concurrent validity with (scales of) other questionnaires showed moderate to strong expected correlations. Test-retest reliability was satisfactory for all items (kappa 0.47–0.87), as was agreement (63.1–92.0%). Four items and one response option were added to increase feasibility. Conclusions: This study contributes to the development and assessment of psychometric properties of the PAI-YA, which resulted in an improved 64-item version. Evidence was provided for construct validity, known-group validity, concurrent validity and test-retest reliability. These results are an important step in the development of a feasible instrument to investigate and monitor rehabilitation needs of visually impaired young adults, to structure the intake procedure at low vision rehabilitation services and to evaluate the effectiveness of rehabilitation.

Suggested Citation

  • Ellen Bernadette Maria Elsman & Gerardus Hermanus Maria Bartholomeus van Rens & Ruth Marie Antoinette van Nispen, 2018. "Psychometric properties of a new intake questionnaire for visually impaired young adults: The Participation and Activity Inventory for Young Adults (PAI-YA)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-24, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0201701
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201701
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0201701
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0201701&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0201701?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert Tsutakawa & Jane Johnson, 1990. "The effect of uncertainty of item parameter estimation on ability estimates," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 55(2), pages 371-390, June.
    2. Chalmers, R. Philip, 2012. "mirt: A Multidimensional Item Response Theory Package for the R Environment," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 48(i06).
    3. Rizopoulos, Dimitris, 2006. "ltm: An R Package for Latent Variable Modeling and Item Response Analysis," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 17(i05).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniel L. Oberski, 2016. "A Review of Latent Variable Modeling With R," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 41(2), pages 226-233, April.
    2. Cervantes, Víctor H., 2017. "DFIT: An R Package for Raju's Differential Functioning of Items and Tests Framework," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 76(i05).
    3. Jochen Ranger & Kay Brauer, 2022. "On the Generalized S − X 2 –Test of Item Fit: Some Variants, Residuals, and a Graphical Visualization," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 47(2), pages 202-230, April.
    4. Yang Liu & Ji Seung Yang, 2018. "Bootstrap-Calibrated Interval Estimates for Latent Variable Scores in Item Response Theory," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 83(2), pages 333-354, June.
    5. Francisco José Eiroa-Orosa & Laura Limiñana-Bravo, 2019. "An Instrument to Measure Mental Health Professionals’ Beliefs and Attitudes towards Service Users’ Rights," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-16, January.
    6. Jinshu Cui & Heather Rosoff & Richard S. John, 2017. "A Polytomous Item Response Theory Model for Measuring Near-Miss Appraisal as a Psychological Trait," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 14(2), pages 75-86, June.
    7. John Patrick Lalor & Pedro Rodriguez, 2023. "py-irt : A Scalable Item Response Theory Library for Python," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 35(1), pages 5-13, January.
    8. Conte, Federica & Costantini, Giulio & Rinaldi, Luca & Gerosa, Tiziano & Girelli, Luisa, 2020. "Intellect is not that expensive: differential association of cultural and socio-economic factors with crystallized intelligence in a sample of Italian adolescents," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    9. Maxwell Hong & Lizhen Lin & Ying Cheng, 2021. "Asymptotically Corrected Person Fit Statistics for Multidimensional Constructs with Simple Structure and Mixed Item Types," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 86(2), pages 464-488, June.
    10. Izolda Pristojkovic Suko & Magdalena Holter & Erwin Stolz & Elfriede Renate Greimel & Wolfgang Freidl, 2022. "Acculturation, Adaptation, and Health among Croatian Migrants in Austria and Ireland: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-15, December.
    11. Nana Kim & Daniel M. Bolt & James Wollack, 2022. "Noncompensatory MIRT For Passage-Based Tests," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 87(3), pages 992-1009, September.
    12. Ying Cheng & Ke-Hai Yuan, 2010. "The Impact of Fallible Item Parameter Estimates on Latent Trait Recovery," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 75(2), pages 280-291, June.
    13. Mi Jung Lee & Daejin Kim & Sergio Romero & Ickpyo Hong & Nikolay Bliznyuk & Craig Velozo, 2022. "Examining Older Adults’ Home Functioning Using the American Housing Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-13, April.
    14. Giada Spaccapanico Proietti & Mariagiulia Matteucci & Stefania Mignani & Bernard P. Veldkamp, 2024. "Chance-Constrained Automated Test Assembly," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 49(1), pages 92-120, February.
    15. Nick Bailey, 2020. "Measuring Poverty Efficiently Using Adaptive Deprivation Scales," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 149(3), pages 891-910, June.
    16. W. W. Koczkodaj & T. Kakiashvili & A. Szymańska & J. Montero-Marin & R. Araya & J. Garcia-Campayo & K. Rutkowski & D. Strzałka, 2017. "How to reduce the number of rating scale items without predictability loss?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 111(2), pages 581-593, May.
    17. Yang Yixin & Lü Xin & Ma Jian & Qiao Han, 2014. "A Robust Factor Analysis Model for Dichotomous Data," Journal of Systems Science and Information, De Gruyter, vol. 2(5), pages 437-450, October.
    18. Arulmani Thiyagarajan & Tyler G. James & Roy Rillera Marzo, 2022. "Psychometric properties of the 21-item Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS-21) among Malaysians during COVID-19: a methodological study," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-8, December.
    19. Qian Wu & Monique Vanerum & Anouk Agten & Andrés Christiansen & Frank Vandenabeele & Jean-Michel Rigo & Rianne Janssen, 2021. "Certainty-Based Marking on Multiple-Choice Items: Psychometrics Meets Decision Theory," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 86(2), pages 518-543, June.
    20. Renan P. Monteiro & Gabriel Lins de Holanda Coelho & Paul H. P. Hanel & Emerson Diógenes Medeiros & Phillip Dyamond Gomes Silva, 2022. "The Efficient Assessment of Self-Esteem: Proposing the Brief Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 17(2), pages 931-947, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0201701. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.