IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0094367.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Structural Validity of the Tonic Immobility Scale in a Population Exposed to Trauma: Evidence from Two Large Brazilian Samples

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Reichenheim
  • Wanderson Souza
  • Evandro Silva Freire Coutinho
  • Ivan Figueira
  • Maria Inês Quintana
  • Marcelo Feijó de Mello
  • Rodrigo Affonseca Bressan
  • Jair de Jesus Mari
  • Sergio Baxter Andreoli

Abstract

Background: Tonic Immobility is a temporary state of motor inhibition in situations involving extreme fear. The first scale developed for its assessment was the 10-item Tonic Immobility Scale (TIS). However, there are still few studies on its structural (dimensional) validity. The objective of this study was to reassess the factor structure of the TIS applied to representative samples exposed to general trauma of two Brazilian mega-cities. Methods: The sample comprised 3,223 participants reporting at least one traumatic experience. In São Paulo (n = 2,148), a Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) first tested the originally proposed two-dimensional structure. This was followed by sequential Exploratory Structural Equation Models to identify the best fitting model, and subsequently tested in Rio de Janeiro (n = 1,075) via CFA. Alternative reduced versions were further explored using the aggregate sample. Model-based Item Response Theory (IRT) location parameters were also investigated. Results: An absence of factor-based convergent and discriminant validity rejected the original proposition. However, the one-dimensional structure still held several residual correlations. Further exploration indicated the sustainability of reduced versions with seven (alternative A) and six (alternative B) items. Both presented excellent fit and no relevant residual item correlation. According to the IRT location parameters, items in alternative B covered a wider range of the latent trait. The Loevinger's H scalability coefficients underscored this pattern. Conclusions: The original model did not hold. A one-factor solution was the most tenable in both large samples, but with significant item residual correlations, indicating that content redundancies persisted. Further reduced and simplified versions of the TIS proved promising. Although studies are yet to be carried out in other settings, it is the authors' impression that the restricted versions of the TIS are already apt for use in epidemiologic studies since the pros tend to outweigh the cons (as outlined in the Discussion section).

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Reichenheim & Wanderson Souza & Evandro Silva Freire Coutinho & Ivan Figueira & Maria Inês Quintana & Marcelo Feijó de Mello & Rodrigo Affonseca Bressan & Jair de Jesus Mari & Sergio Baxter An, 2014. "Structural Validity of the Tonic Immobility Scale in a Population Exposed to Trauma: Evidence from Two Large Brazilian Samples," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(4), pages 1-7, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0094367
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094367
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0094367
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0094367&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0094367?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jean-Benoit Hardouin & Angelique Bonnaud-Antignac & Veronique Sebille, 2011. "Nonparametric item response theory using Stata," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 11(1), pages 30-51, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mei Zhang & Xinliang Wang, 2023. "Measurement of Common Prosperity of Chinese Rural Households Using Graded Response Models: Evidence from Zhejiang Province," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-16, March.
    2. Olivier Beaumais & Mireille Chiroleu-Assouline, 2023. "Unaware Corporate Social Responsibility: Impact of Firm Size, Motivations and External Pressures," PSE Working Papers halshs-04003040, HAL.
    3. Olivier Beaumais & Mireille Chiroleu-Assouline, 2020. "Informal versus Formal Corporate Social Responsibility: a Tale of Hidden Green Attitude," PSE Working Papers halshs-03073242, HAL.
    4. Lorenzo Corsini & Irene Martelli, 2020. "Measuring and detecting situations of need and deprivation using Graded Response models," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(15), pages 1289-1294, September.
    5. Ang, Shannon & Malhotra, Rahul, 2016. "Association of received social support with depressive symptoms among older males and females in Singapore: Is personal mastery an inconsistent mediator?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 165-173.
    6. Zenghui Huo & Mei Zhang, 2023. "Multidimensional Deprivation and Subgroup Heterogeneity of Rural Households in China: Empirical Evidence from Latent Variable Estimation Methods," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 165(3), pages 975-997, February.
    7. Monica Szeles & Alessio Fusco, 2013. "Item response theory and the measurement of deprivation: evidence from Luxembourg data," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 47(3), pages 1545-1560, April.
    8. Jonathan Rose & Cees van der Eijk, 2022. "The World Isn’t Fair, but Shouldn’t Elections Be? Evaluating Prospective Beliefs about the Fairness of Elections and Referenda," Societies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-27, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0094367. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.