IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0045506.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Microarray Meta-Analysis Identifies Acute Lung Injury Biomarkers in Donor Lungs That Predict Development of Primary Graft Failure in Recipients

Author

Listed:
  • Pingzhao Hu
  • Xinchen Wang
  • Jack J Haitsma
  • Suleiman Furmli
  • Hussain Masoom
  • Mingyao Liu
  • Yumiko Imai
  • Arthur S Slutsky
  • Joseph Beyene
  • Celia M T Greenwood
  • Claudia dos Santos

Abstract

Objectives: To perform a meta-analysis of gene expression microarray data from animal studies of lung injury, and to identify an injury-specific gene expression signature capable of predicting the development of lung injury in humans. Methods: We performed a microarray meta-analysis using 77 microarray chips across six platforms, two species and different animal lung injury models exposed to lung injury with or/and without mechanical ventilation. Individual gene chips were classified and grouped based on the strategy used to induce lung injury. Effect size (change in gene expression) was calculated between non-injurious and injurious conditions comparing two main strategies to pool chips: (1) one-hit and (2) two-hit lung injury models. A random effects model was used to integrate individual effect sizes calculated from each experiment. Classification models were built using the gene expression signatures generated by the meta-analysis to predict the development of lung injury in human lung transplant recipients. Results: Two injury-specific lists of differentially expressed genes generated from our meta-analysis of lung injury models were validated using external data sets and prospective data from animal models of ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). Pathway analysis of gene sets revealed that both new and previously implicated VILI-related pathways are enriched with differentially regulated genes. Classification model based on gene expression signatures identified in animal models of lung injury predicted development of primary graft failure (PGF) in lung transplant recipients with larger than 80% accuracy based upon injury profiles from transplant donors. We also found that better classifier performance can be achieved by using meta-analysis to identify differentially-expressed genes than using single study-based differential analysis. Conclusion: Taken together, our data suggests that microarray analysis of gene expression data allows for the detection of “injury" gene predictors that can classify lung injury samples and identify patients at risk for clinically relevant lung injury complications.

Suggested Citation

  • Pingzhao Hu & Xinchen Wang & Jack J Haitsma & Suleiman Furmli & Hussain Masoom & Mingyao Liu & Yumiko Imai & Arthur S Slutsky & Joseph Beyene & Celia M T Greenwood & Claudia dos Santos, 2012. "Microarray Meta-Analysis Identifies Acute Lung Injury Biomarkers in Donor Lungs That Predict Development of Primary Graft Failure in Recipients," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(10), pages 1-17, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0045506
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045506
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0045506
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0045506&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0045506?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Geman Donald & d'Avignon Christian & Naiman Daniel Q. & Winslow Raimond L., 2004. "Classifying Gene Expression Profiles from Pairwise mRNA Comparisons," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 3(1), pages 1-22, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hossain, Ahmed & Beyene, Joseph & Willan, Andrew R. & Hu, Pingzhao, 2009. "A flexible approximate likelihood ratio test for detecting differential expression in microarray data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(10), pages 3685-3695, August.
    2. Armando Fernandes & Susana Vinga, 2016. "Improving Protein Expression Prediction Using Extra Features and Ensemble Averaging," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-15, March.
    3. Parker Hilary S. & Leek Jeffrey T., 2012. "The practical effect of batch on genomic prediction," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 11(3), pages 1-22, April.
    4. Yang, Tae Young, 2009. "Simple Bayesian binary framework for discovering significant genes and classifying cancer diagnosis," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(5), pages 1743-1754, March.
    5. Yang Sitan & Naiman Daniel Q., 2014. "Multiclass cancer classification based on gene expression comparison," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, August.
    6. Quynh Van Nong & Chi Tim Ng, 2021. "Clustering of subsample means based on pairwise L1 regularized empirical likelihood," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 73(1), pages 135-174, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0045506. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.