IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/sagmbi/v3y2004i1n19.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Classifying Gene Expression Profiles from Pairwise mRNA Comparisons

Author

Listed:
  • Geman Donald

    (Johns Hopkins University)

  • d'Avignon Christian

    (Johns Hopkins University)

  • Naiman Daniel Q.

    (Johns Hopkins University)

  • Winslow Raimond L.

    (Johns Hopkins University)

Abstract

We present a new approach to molecular classification based on mRNA comparisons. Our method, referred to as the top-scoring pair(s) (TSP) classifier, is motivated by current technical and practical limitations in using gene expression microarray data for class prediction, for example to detect disease, identify tumors or predict treatment response. Accurate statistical inference from such data is difficult due to the small number of observations, typically tens, relative to the large number of genes, typically thousands. Moreover, conventional methods from machine learning lead to decisions which are usually very difficult to interpret in simple or biologically meaningful terms. In contrast, the TSP classifier provides decision rules which i) involve very few genes and only relative expression values (e.g., comparing the mRNA counts within a single pair of genes); ii) are both accurate and transparent; and iii) provide specific hypotheses for follow-up studies. In particular, the TSP classifier achieves prediction rates with standard cancer data that are as high as those of previous studies which use considerably more genes and complex procedures. Finally, the TSP classifier is parameter-free, thus avoiding the type of over-fitting and inflated estimates of performance that result when all aspects of learning a predictor are not properly cross-validated.

Suggested Citation

  • Geman Donald & d'Avignon Christian & Naiman Daniel Q. & Winslow Raimond L., 2004. "Classifying Gene Expression Profiles from Pairwise mRNA Comparisons," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 3(1), pages 1-22, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:sagmbi:v:3:y:2004:i:1:n:19
    DOI: 10.2202/1544-6115.1071
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2202/1544-6115.1071
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2202/1544-6115.1071?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hossain, Ahmed & Beyene, Joseph & Willan, Andrew R. & Hu, Pingzhao, 2009. "A flexible approximate likelihood ratio test for detecting differential expression in microarray data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(10), pages 3685-3695, August.
    2. Pingzhao Hu & Xinchen Wang & Jack J Haitsma & Suleiman Furmli & Hussain Masoom & Mingyao Liu & Yumiko Imai & Arthur S Slutsky & Joseph Beyene & Celia M T Greenwood & Claudia dos Santos, 2012. "Microarray Meta-Analysis Identifies Acute Lung Injury Biomarkers in Donor Lungs That Predict Development of Primary Graft Failure in Recipients," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(10), pages 1-17, October.
    3. Yang, Tae Young, 2009. "Simple Bayesian binary framework for discovering significant genes and classifying cancer diagnosis," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(5), pages 1743-1754, March.
    4. Quynh Van Nong & Chi Tim Ng, 2021. "Clustering of subsample means based on pairwise L1 regularized empirical likelihood," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 73(1), pages 135-174, February.
    5. Parker Hilary S. & Leek Jeffrey T., 2012. "The practical effect of batch on genomic prediction," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 11(3), pages 1-22, April.
    6. Yang Sitan & Naiman Daniel Q., 2014. "Multiclass cancer classification based on gene expression comparison," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, August.
    7. Armando Fernandes & Susana Vinga, 2016. "Improving Protein Expression Prediction Using Extra Features and Ensemble Averaging," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-15, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:sagmbi:v:3:y:2004:i:1:n:19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.