IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0023323.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Automatic Prediction of Facial Trait Judgments: Appearance vs. Structural Models

Author

Listed:
  • Mario Rojas Q.
  • David Masip
  • Alexander Todorov
  • Jordi Vitria

Abstract

Evaluating other individuals with respect to personality characteristics plays a crucial role in human relations and it is the focus of attention for research in diverse fields such as psychology and interactive computer systems. In psychology, face perception has been recognized as a key component of this evaluation system. Multiple studies suggest that observers use face information to infer personality characteristics. Interactive computer systems are trying to take advantage of these findings and apply them to increase the natural aspect of interaction and to improve the performance of interactive computer systems. Here, we experimentally test whether the automatic prediction of facial trait judgments (e.g. dominance) can be made by using the full appearance information of the face and whether a reduced representation of its structure is sufficient. We evaluate two separate approaches: a holistic representation model using the facial appearance information and a structural model constructed from the relations among facial salient points. State of the art machine learning methods are applied to a) derive a facial trait judgment model from training data and b) predict a facial trait value for any face. Furthermore, we address the issue of whether there are specific structural relations among facial points that predict perception of facial traits. Experimental results over a set of labeled data (9 different trait evaluations) and classification rules (4 rules) suggest that a) prediction of perception of facial traits is learnable by both holistic and structural approaches; b) the most reliable prediction of facial trait judgments is obtained by certain type of holistic descriptions of the face appearance; and c) for some traits such as attractiveness and extroversion, there are relationships between specific structural features and social perceptions.

Suggested Citation

  • Mario Rojas Q. & David Masip & Alexander Todorov & Jordi Vitria, 2011. "Automatic Prediction of Facial Trait Judgments: Appearance vs. Structural Models," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(8), pages 1-12, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0023323
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023323
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0023323
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0023323&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0023323?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Erik J Schlicht & Shinsuke Shimojo & Colin F Camerer & Peter Battaglia & Ken Nakayama, 2010. "Human Wagering Behavior Depends on Opponents' Faces," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(7), pages 1-10, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. David Masip & Michael S North & Alexander Todorov & Daniel N Osherson, 2014. "Automated Prediction of Preferences Using Facial Expressions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(2), pages 1-5, February.
    2. Felix Fuentes-Hurtado & Jose A. Diego-Mas & Valery Naranjo & Mariano AlcaƱiz, 2018. "Evolutionary Computation for Modelling Social Traits in Realistic Looking Synthetic Faces," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-16, October.
    3. Aromi, J. Daniel & Clements, Adam, 2021. "Facial expressions and the business cycle," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hsieh, Tien-Shih & Kim, Jeong-Bon & Wang, Ray R. & Wang, Zhihong, 2020. "Seeing is believing? Executives' facial trustworthiness, auditor tenure, and audit fees," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(1).
    2. Duan, Yang & Hsieh, Tien-Shih & Wang, Ray R. & Wang, Zhihong, 2020. "Entrepreneurs' facial trustworthiness, gender, and crowdfunding success," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    3. Ronnie Bryan & Pietro Perona & Ralph Adolphs, 2012. "Perspective Distortion from Interpersonal Distance Is an Implicit Visual Cue for Social Judgments of Faces," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(9), pages 1-9, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0023323. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.