IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0021034.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Statistical Quantification of Methylation Levels by Next-Generation Sequencing

Author

Listed:
  • Guodong Wu
  • Nengjun Yi
  • Devin Absher
  • Degui Zhi

Abstract

Background/Aims: Recently, next-generation sequencing-based technologies have enabled DNA methylation profiling at high resolution and low cost. Methyl-Seq and Reduced Representation Bisulfite Sequencing (RRBS) are two such technologies that interrogate methylation levels at CpG sites throughout the entire human genome. With rapid reduction of sequencing costs, these technologies will enable epigenotyping of large cohorts for phenotypic association studies. Existing quantification methods for sequencing-based methylation profiling are simplistic and do not deal with the noise due to the random sampling nature of sequencing and various experimental artifacts. Therefore, there is a need to investigate the statistical issues related to the quantification of methylation levels for these emerging technologies, with the goal of developing an accurate quantification method. Methods: In this paper, we propose two methods for Methyl-Seq quantification. The first method, the Maximum Likelihood estimate, is both conceptually intuitive and computationally simple. However, this estimate is biased at extreme methylation levels and does not provide variance estimation. The second method, based on Bayesian hierarchical model, allows variance estimation of methylation levels, and provides a flexible framework to adjust technical bias in the sequencing process. Results: We compare the previously proposed binary method, the Maximum Likelihood (ML) method, and the Bayesian method. In both simulation and real data analysis of Methyl-Seq data, the Bayesian method offers the most accurate quantification. The ML method is slightly less accurate than the Bayesian method. But both our proposed methods outperform the original binary method in Methyl-Seq. In addition, we applied these quantification methods to simulation data and show that, with sequencing depth above 40–300 (which varies with different tissue samples) per cleavage site, Methyl-Seq offers a comparable quantification consistency as microarrays.

Suggested Citation

  • Guodong Wu & Nengjun Yi & Devin Absher & Degui Zhi, 2011. "Statistical Quantification of Methylation Levels by Next-Generation Sequencing," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(6), pages 1-12, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0021034
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021034
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0021034
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0021034&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0021034?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ryan Lister & Mattia Pelizzola & Robert H. Dowen & R. David Hawkins & Gary Hon & Julian Tonti-Filippini & Joseph R. Nery & Leonard Lee & Zhen Ye & Que-Minh Ngo & Lee Edsall & Jessica Antosiewicz-Bourg, 2009. "Human DNA methylomes at base resolution show widespread epigenomic differences," Nature, Nature, vol. 462(7271), pages 315-322, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ching-Lin Hsiao & Ai-Ru Hsieh & Ie-Bin Lian & Ying-Chao Lin & Hui-Min Wang & Cathy S J Fann, 2014. "A Novel Method for Identification and Quantification of Consistently Differentially Methylated Regions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(5), pages 1-11, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xuelong Yao & Zongyang Lu & Zhanying Feng & Lei Gao & Xin Zhou & Min Li & Suijuan Zhong & Qian Wu & Zhenbo Liu & Haofeng Zhang & Zeyuan Liu & Lizhi Yi & Tao Zhou & Xudong Zhao & Jun Zhang & Yong Wang , 2022. "Comparison of chromatin accessibility landscapes during early development of prefrontal cortex between rhesus macaque and human," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    2. Rakesh Chettier & Lesa Nelson & James W Ogilvie & Hans M Albertsen & Kenneth Ward, 2015. "Haplotypes at LBX1 Have Distinct Inheritance Patterns with Opposite Effects in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(2), pages 1-11, February.
    3. Xue Yue & Zhiyuan Xie & Moran Li & Kai Wang & Xiaojing Li & Xiaoqing Zhang & Jian Yan & Yimeng Yin, 2022. "Simultaneous profiling of histone modifications and DNA methylation via nanopore sequencing," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    4. Anyou Wang & Ying Du & Qianchuan He & Chunxiao Zhou, 2013. "A Quantitative System for Discriminating Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells, Embryonic Stem Cells and Somatic Cells," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(2), pages 1-10, February.
    5. Yu Xiaoqing & Sun Shuying, 2016. "Comparing five statistical methods of differential methylation identification using bisulfite sequencing data," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 15(2), pages 173-191, April.
    6. Jian Fang & Jianjun Jiang & Sarah M. Leichter & Jie Liu & Mahamaya Biswal & Nelli Khudaverdyan & Xuehua Zhong & Jikui Song, 2022. "Mechanistic basis for maintenance of CHG DNA methylation in plants," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.
    7. Allegra Angeloni & Skye Fissette & Deniz Kaya & Jillian M. Hammond & Hasindu Gamaarachchi & Ira W. Deveson & Robert J. Klose & Weiming Li & Xiaotian Zhang & Ozren Bogdanovic, 2024. "Extensive DNA methylome rearrangement during early lamprey embryogenesis," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    8. Jason A. Carter & Léonie Strömich & Matthew Peacey & Sarah R. Chapin & Lars Velten & Lars M. Steinmetz & Benedikt Brors & Sheena Pinto & Hannah V. Meyer, 2022. "Transcriptomic diversity in human medullary thymic epithelial cells," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    9. Lacey Michelle R. & Baribault Carl & Ehrlich Melanie, 2013. "Modeling, simulation and analysis of methylation profiles from reduced representation bisulfite sequencing experiments," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 12(6), pages 723-742, December.
    10. Ruth V. Nichols & Brendan L. O’Connell & Ryan M. Mulqueen & Jerushah Thomas & Ashley R. Woodfin & Sonia Acharya & Gail Mandel & Dmitry Pokholok & Frank J. Steemers & Andrew C. Adey, 2022. "High-throughput robust single-cell DNA methylation profiling with sciMETv2," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.
    11. Ihab Ansari & Llorenç Solé-Boldo & Meshi Ridnik & Julian Gutekunst & Oliver Gilliam & Maria Korshko & Timur Liwinski & Birgit Jickeli & Noa Weinberg-Corem & Michal Shoshkes-Carmel & Eli Pikarsky & Era, 2023. "TET2 and TET3 loss disrupts small intestine differentiation and homeostasis," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, December.
    12. Jamie L. Endicott & Paula A. Nolte & Hui Shen & Peter W. Laird, 2022. "Cell division drives DNA methylation loss in late-replicating domains in primary human cells," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.
    13. Singer Meromit & Engström Alexander & Schönhuth Alexander & Pachter Lior, 2011. "Determining Coding CpG Islands by Identifying Regions Significant for Pattern Statistics on Markov Chains," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 1-27, September.
    14. Brendan Evano & Diljeet Gill & Irene Hernando-Herraez & Glenda Comai & Thomas M Stubbs & Pierre-Henri Commere & Wolf Reik & Shahragim Tajbakhsh, 2020. "Transcriptome and epigenome diversity and plasticity of muscle stem cells following transplantation," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(10), pages 1-21, October.
    15. Sun Shuying & Yu Xiaoqing, 2016. "HMM-Fisher: identifying differential methylation using a hidden Markov model and Fisher’s exact test," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 15(1), pages 55-67, March.
    16. Jiang Li & Fangxu Han & Tongqi Yuan & Wei Li & Yue Li & Harry X. Wu & Hairong Wei & Shihui Niu, 2023. "The methylation landscape of giga-genome and the epigenetic timer of age in Chinese pine," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.
    17. Yu Xiaoqing & Sun Shuying, 2016. "HMM-DM: identifying differentially methylated regions using a hidden Markov model," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 15(1), pages 69-81, March.
    18. Romain O. Georges & Hugo Sepulveda & J. Carlos Angel & Eric Johnson & Susan Palomino & Roberta B. Nowak & Arshad Desai & Isaac F. López-Moyado & Anjana Rao, 2022. "Acute deletion of TET enzymes results in aneuploidy in mouse embryonic stem cells through decreased expression of Khdc3," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    19. Christopher G Bell & Sarah Finer & Cecilia M Lindgren & Gareth A Wilson & Vardhman K Rakyan & Andrew E Teschendorff & Pelin Akan & Elia Stupka & Thomas A Down & Inga Prokopenko & Ian M Morison & Jonat, 2010. "Integrated Genetic and Epigenetic Analysis Identifies Haplotype-Specific Methylation in the FTO Type 2 Diabetes and Obesity Susceptibility Locus," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(11), pages 1-12, November.
    20. Olbricht Gayla R. & Craig Bruce A. & Doerge Rebecca W., 2012. "Incorporating Genomic Annotation into a Hidden Markov Model for DNA Methylation Tiling Array Data," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 11(5), pages 1-37, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0021034. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.