IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1005876.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examining the controllability of sepsis using genetic algorithms on an agent-based model of systemic inflammation

Author

Listed:
  • Robert Chase Cockrell
  • Gary An

Abstract

Sepsis, a manifestation of the body’s inflammatory response to injury and infection, has a mortality rate of between 28%-50% and affects approximately 1 million patients annually in the United States. Currently, there are no therapies targeting the cellular/molecular processes driving sepsis that have demonstrated the ability to control this disease process in the clinical setting. We propose that this is in great part due to the considerable heterogeneity of the clinical trajectories that constitute clinical “sepsis,” and that determining how this system can be controlled back into a state of health requires the application of concepts drawn from the field of dynamical systems. In this work, we consider the human immune system to be a random dynamical system, and investigate its potential controllability using an agent-based model of the innate immune response (the Innate Immune Response ABM or IIRABM) as a surrogate, proxy system. Simulation experiments with the IIRABM provide an explanation as to why single/limited cytokine perturbations at a single, or small number of, time points is unlikely to significantly improve the mortality rate of sepsis. We then use genetic algorithms (GA) to explore and characterize multi-targeted control strategies for the random dynamical immune system that guide it from a persistent, non-recovering inflammatory state (functionally equivalent to the clinical states of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) or sepsis) to a state of health. We train the GA on a single parameter set with multiple stochastic replicates, and show that while the calculated results show good generalizability, more advanced strategies are needed to achieve the goal of adaptive personalized medicine. This work evaluating the extent of interventions needed to control a simplified surrogate model of sepsis provides insight into the scope of the clinical challenge, and can serve as a guide on the path towards true “precision control” of sepsis. Author summary: Sepsis, characterized by the body’s inflammatory response to injury and infection, has a mortality rate of between 28%-50% and affects approximately 1 million patients annually in the United States. Currently, there are no therapies targeting the cellular/molecular processes driving sepsis that have demonstrated the ability to control this disease process. In this work, we utilize a computational model of the human immune response to infectious injury to offer an explanation as to why previously attempted treatment strategies are inadequate and why the current approach to drug/therapy-development is inadequate. We then use evolutionary computation algorithms to explore drug-intervention space using this same computational model as a surrogate system for human sepsis to identify the scale and scope of interventions to successfully control sepsis, as well as the types of data needed to derive these interventions. We demonstrate that multi-point and time-dependent varying controls are necessary and able to control the cytokine network dynamics of the immune system.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert Chase Cockrell & Gary An, 2018. "Examining the controllability of sepsis using genetic algorithms on an agent-based model of systemic inflammation," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(2), pages 1-17, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1005876
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005876
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005876
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005876&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005876?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Terry L. Friesz, 2010. "Dynamic Optimization and Differential Games," International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Springer, number 978-0-387-72778-3, September.
    2. Rabi Bhattacharya & Mukul Majumdar, 2003. "Random dynamical systems: a review," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 23(1), pages 13-38, December.
    3. David Levine, 1997. "Commentary---Genetic Algorithms: A Practitioner's View," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 9(3), pages 256-259, August.
    4. Terry L. Friesz, 2010. "Nonlinear Programming and Discrete-Time Optimal Control," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Dynamic Optimization and Differential Games, chapter 0, pages 33-78, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hoang, Nam H. & Vu, Hai L. & Lo, Hong K., 2018. "An informed user equilibrium dynamic traffic assignment problem in a multiple origin-destination stochastic network," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 207-230.
    2. Chung, Sung H. & Weaver, Robert D. & Friesz, Terry L., 2013. "Strategic response to pollution taxes in supply chain networks: Dynamic, spatial, and organizational dimensions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 231(2), pages 314-327.
    3. Francesca Calà Campana & Gabriele Ciaramella & Alfio Borzì, 2021. "Nash Equilibria and Bargaining Solutions of Differential Bilinear Games," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-28, March.
    4. Mourdoukoutas, Fotios & Boonen, Tim J. & Koo, Bonsoo & Pantelous, Athanasios A., 2021. "Pricing in a competitive stochastic insurance market," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 44-56.
    5. Junwoo Song & Simon Hu & Ke Han & Chaozhe Jiang, 2020. "Nonlinear Decision Rule Approach for Real-Time Traffic Signal Control for Congestion and Emission Mitigation," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 675-702, September.
    6. Chan, Chi Kin & Zhou, Yan & Wong, Kar Hung, 2018. "A dynamic equilibrium model of the oligopolistic closed-loop supply chain network under uncertain and time-dependent demands," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 325-354.
    7. Zhaobo Chen & Chunying Tian & Ding Zhang & Dongyan Chen, 2020. "Dynamic model of a supply chain network with sticky price," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 649-670, June.
    8. Xing Wang & Zeng-bao Wu & Yi-bin Xiao & Kok Lay Teo, 2020. "Dynamic variational inequality in fuzzy environments," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 275-296, September.
    9. Ionel Popescu & Tushar Vaidya, 2019. "Averaging plus Learning Models and Their Asymptotics," Papers 1904.08131, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2023.
    10. Piero Mazzarisi & Fabrizio Lillo & Stefano Marmi, 2018. "When panic makes you blind: a chaotic route to systemic risk," Papers 1805.00785, arXiv.org.
    11. Manuel S. Santos & Adrian Peralta-Alva, 2005. "Accuracy of Simulations for Stochastic Dynamic Models," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 73(6), pages 1939-1976, November.
    12. Friesz, Terry L. & Lee, Ilsoo & Lin, Cheng-Chang, 2011. "Competition and disruption in a dynamic urban supply chain," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(8), pages 1212-1231, September.
    13. Lars J. Olson & Santanu Roy, 2006. "Theory of Stochastic Optimal Economic Growth," Springer Books, in: Rose-Anne Dana & Cuong Le Van & Tapan Mitra & Kazuo Nishimura (ed.), Handbook on Optimal Growth 1, chapter 11, pages 297-335, Springer.
    14. Steffen Jørgensen, 2012. "Book Review: "Games and Dynamic Games" Edited by Alain Haurie, Jacek B. Krawczyk and Georges Zaccour," International Game Theory Review (IGTR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(02), pages 1-3.
    15. Santos, Manuel S., 2004. "Simulation-based estimation of dynamic models with continuous equilibrium solutions," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(3-4), pages 465-491, June.
    16. Rui Ma & Xuegang (Jeff) Ban & Jong-Shi Pang, 2018. "A Link-Based Differential Complementarity System Formulation for Continuous-Time Dynamic User Equilibria with Queue Spillbacks," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(3), pages 564-592, June.
    17. Takashi Kamihigashi & John Stachurski, 2014. "Stability Analysis for Random Dynamical Systems in Economics," Discussion Paper Series DP2014-35, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University.
    18. Friesz, Terry L. & Han, Ke & Neto, Pedro A. & Meimand, Amir & Yao, Tao, 2013. "Dynamic user equilibrium based on a hydrodynamic model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 102-126.
    19. Kieran P. Donaghy, 2014. "Walter Isard’s Evolving Sense of the Scientific in Regional Science," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 37(1), pages 78-95, January.
    20. Dragicevic, Arnaud Z. & Barkaoui, Ahmed, 2017. "Forest-based industrial network: Case of the French timber market," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 23-33.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1005876. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.