IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1004445.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Task-Driven Activity Reduces the Cortical Activity Space of the Brain: Experiment and Whole-Brain Modeling

Author

Listed:
  • Adrián Ponce-Alvarez
  • Biyu J He
  • Patric Hagmann
  • Gustavo Deco

Abstract

How a stimulus or a task alters the spontaneous dynamics of the brain remains a fundamental open question in neuroscience. One of the most robust hallmarks of task/stimulus-driven brain dynamics is the decrease of variability with respect to the spontaneous level, an effect seen across multiple experimental conditions and in brain signals observed at different spatiotemporal scales. Recently, it was observed that the trial-to-trial variability and temporal variance of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) signals decrease in the task-driven activity. Here we examined the dynamics of a large-scale model of the human cortex to provide a mechanistic understanding of these observations. The model allows computing the statistics of synaptic activity in the spontaneous condition and in putative tasks determined by external inputs to a given subset of brain regions. We demonstrated that external inputs decrease the variance, increase the covariances, and decrease the autocovariance of synaptic activity as a consequence of single node and large-scale network dynamics. Altogether, these changes in network statistics imply a reduction of entropy, meaning that the spontaneous synaptic activity outlines a larger multidimensional activity space than does the task-driven activity. We tested this model’s prediction on fMRI signals from healthy humans acquired during rest and task conditions and found a significant decrease of entropy in the stimulus-driven activity. Altogether, our study proposes a mechanism for increasing the information capacity of brain networks by enlarging the volume of possible activity configurations at rest and reliably settling into a confined stimulus-driven state to allow better transmission of stimulus-related information.Author Summary: Task- or stimulus-related changes of brain dynamics have been the subject of intense investigation during the last years. One of the most robust hallmarks of task/stimulus-driven brain dynamics, as measured using diverse recording techniques, is the decrease of variability with respect to the spontaneous level. This has led several researchers to focus on the second-order statistics of evoked activity and to study their functional consequences for information processing. In particular, it was observed that the trial-to-trial variability (related to variable responses to an identical stimulus from one presentation to the next) and the temporal variance of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) signals decrease in the task-driven activity. Here, we built a computational model of the whole brain to understand how local and large-scale brain dynamics contribute to these effects. The model allowed us to derive equations for the network statistics of both spontaneous and evoked activity. We observed that, as a consequence of single node and network dynamics, stimulus input impacts network statistics in such a way that the entropy of the stimulus-driven activity is lower than that during spontaneous activity. We confirmed this model prediction using empirical fMRI data and we further discuss its functional implications.

Suggested Citation

  • Adrián Ponce-Alvarez & Biyu J He & Patric Hagmann & Gustavo Deco, 2015. "Task-Driven Activity Reduces the Cortical Activity Space of the Brain: Experiment and Whole-Brain Modeling," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-26, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1004445
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004445
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004445
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004445&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004445?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nikos K. Logothetis & Jon Pauls & Mark Augath & Torsten Trinath & Axel Oeltermann, 2001. "Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal," Nature, Nature, vol. 412(6843), pages 150-157, July.
    2. James F. A. Poulet & Carl C. H. Petersen, 2008. "Internal brain state regulates membrane potential synchrony in barrel cortex of behaving mice," Nature, Nature, vol. 454(7206), pages 881-885, August.
    3. J. L. Vincent & G. H. Patel & M. D. Fox & A. Z. Snyder & J. T. Baker & D. C. Van Essen & J. M. Zempel & L. H. Snyder & M. Corbetta & M. E. Raichle, 2007. "Intrinsic functional architecture in the anaesthetized monkey brain," Nature, Nature, vol. 447(7140), pages 83-86, May.
    4. Tal Kenet & Dmitri Bibitchkov & Misha Tsodyks & Amiram Grinvald & Amos Arieli, 2003. "Spontaneously emerging cortical representations of visual attributes," Nature, Nature, vol. 425(6961), pages 954-956, October.
    5. Biyu J He & John M Zempel, 2013. "Average Is Optimal: An Inverted-U Relationship between Trial-to-Trial Brain Activity and Behavioral Performance," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(11), pages 1-14, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jessie M H Szostakiwskyj & Stephanie E Willatt & Filomeno Cortese & Andrea B Protzner, 2017. "The modulation of EEG variability between internally- and externally-driven cognitive states varies with maturation and task performance," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(7), pages 1-27, July.
    2. Vaibhav A Diwadkar & Avisa Asemi & Ashley Burgess & Asadur Chowdury & Steven L Bressler, 2017. "Potentiation of motor sub-networks for motor control but not working memory: Interaction of dACC and SMA revealed by resting-state directed functional connectivity," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(3), pages 1-17, March.
    3. Takuya Ito & Scott L Brincat & Markus Siegel & Ravi D Mill & Biyu J He & Earl K Miller & Horacio G Rotstein & Michael W Cole, 2020. "Task-evoked activity quenches neural correlations and variability across cortical areas," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(8), pages 1-39, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chaogan Yan & Dongqiang Liu & Yong He & Qihong Zou & Chaozhe Zhu & Xinian Zuo & Xiangyu Long & Yufeng Zang, 2009. "Spontaneous Brain Activity in the Default Mode Network Is Sensitive to Different Resting-State Conditions with Limited Cognitive Load," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(5), pages 1-11, May.
    2. Audrey J Sederberg & Aurélie Pala & He J V Zheng & Biyu J He & Garrett B Stanley, 2019. "State-aware detection of sensory stimuli in the cortex of the awake mouse," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-24, May.
    3. Christian Donner & Klaus Obermayer & Hideaki Shimazaki, 2017. "Approximate Inference for Time-Varying Interactions and Macroscopic Dynamics of Neural Populations," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-27, January.
    4. Ashok Litwin-Kumar & Anne-Marie M Oswald & Nathaniel N Urban & Brent Doiron, 2011. "Balanced Synaptic Input Shapes the Correlation between Neural Spike Trains," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(12), pages 1-14, December.
    5. Protachevicz, Paulo Ricardo & Borges, Fernando da Silva & Batista, Antonio Marcos & Baptista, Murilo da Silva & Caldas, Iberê Luiz & Macau, Elbert Einstein Nehrer & Lameu, Ewandson Luiz, 2023. "Plastic neural network with transmission delays promotes equivalence between function and structure," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    6. Laura Biagi & Sofia Allegra Crespi & Michela Tosetti & Maria Concetta Morrone, 2015. "BOLD Response Selective to Flow-Motion in Very Young Infants," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(9), pages 1-22, September.
    7. Huee Ru Chong & Yadollah Ranjbar-Slamloo & Malcolm Zheng Hao Ho & Xuan Ouyang & Tsukasa Kamigaki, 2023. "Functional alterations of the prefrontal circuit underlying cognitive aging in mice," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, December.
    8. Simone Carlo Surace & Jean-Pascal Pfister, 2015. "A Statistical Model for In Vivo Neuronal Dynamics," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(11), pages 1-21, November.
    9. Doungmo Goufo, Emile F. & Mbehou, Mohamed & Kamga Pene, Morgan M., 2018. "A peculiar application of Atangana–Baleanu fractional derivative in neuroscience: Chaotic burst dynamics," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 170-176.
    10. Irene Neuner & Wolfram Kawohl & Jorge Arrubla & Tracy Warbrick & Konrad Hitz & Christine Wyss & Frank Boers & N Jon Shah, 2014. "Cortical Response Variation with Different Sound Pressure Levels: A Combined Event-Related Potentials and fMRI Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(10), pages 1-14, October.
    11. Zvi N. Roth & Kendrick Kay & Elisha P. Merriam, 2022. "Natural scene sampling reveals reliable coarse-scale orientation tuning in human V1," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    12. Alessandra Griffa & Mathieu Mach & Julien Dedelley & Daniel Gutierrez-Barragan & Alessandro Gozzi & Gilles Allali & Joanes Grandjean & Dimitri Ville & Enrico Amico, 2023. "Evidence for increased parallel information transmission in human brain networks compared to macaques and male mice," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.
    13. Phoebe Koundouri & Barbara Hammer & Ulrike Kuhl & Alina Velias, 2022. "Behavioral and Neuroeconomics of Environmental Values," DEOS Working Papers 2227, Athens University of Economics and Business.
    14. Wan-Yu Shih & Hsiang-Yu Yu & Cheng-Chia Lee & Chien-Chen Chou & Chien Chen & Paul W. Glimcher & Shih-Wei Wu, 2023. "Electrophysiological population dynamics reveal context dependencies during decision making in human frontal cortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-24, December.
    15. Simon A Overduin & Philip Servos, 2008. "Symmetric Sensorimotor Somatotopy," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(1), pages 1-6, January.
    16. Amrita Pal & Jennifer A Ogren & Ravi S Aysola & Rajesh Kumar & Luke A Henderson & Ronald M Harper & Paul M Macey, 2021. "Insular functional organization during handgrip in females and males with obstructive sleep apnea," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(2), pages 1-22, February.
    17. Gavin Perry & Nathan W Taylor & Philippa C H Bothwell & Colette C Milbourn & Georgina Powell & Krish D Singh, 2020. "The gamma response to colour hue in humans: Evidence from MEG," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(12), pages 1-21, December.
    18. Alexis T Baria & Brian Maniscalco & Biyu J He, 2017. "Initial-state-dependent, robust, transient neural dynamics encode conscious visual perception," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(11), pages 1-29, November.
    19. Anandamohan Ghosh & Y Rho & A R McIntosh & R Kötter & V K Jirsa, 2008. "Noise during Rest Enables the Exploration of the Brain's Dynamic Repertoire," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(10), pages 1-12, October.
    20. Olsen, Carmen & Gold, Anna, 2018. "Future research directions at the intersection between cognitive neuroscience research and auditors’ professional skepticism," Journal of Accounting Literature, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 127-141.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1004445. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.