IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1004415.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

ENCORE: Software for Quantitative Ensemble Comparison

Author

Listed:
  • Matteo Tiberti
  • Elena Papaleo
  • Tone Bengtsen
  • Wouter Boomsma
  • Kresten Lindorff-Larsen

Abstract

There is increasing evidence that protein dynamics and conformational changes can play an important role in modulating biological function. As a result, experimental and computational methods are being developed, often synergistically, to study the dynamical heterogeneity of a protein or other macromolecules in solution. Thus, methods such as molecular dynamics simulations or ensemble refinement approaches have provided conformational ensembles that can be used to understand protein function and biophysics. These developments have in turn created a need for algorithms and software that can be used to compare structural ensembles in the same way as the root-mean-square-deviation is often used to compare static structures. Although a few such approaches have been proposed, these can be difficult to implement efficiently, hindering a broader applications and further developments. Here, we present an easily accessible software toolkit, called ENCORE, which can be used to compare conformational ensembles generated either from simulations alone or synergistically with experiments. ENCORE implements three previously described methods for ensemble comparison, that each can be used to quantify the similarity between conformational ensembles by estimating the overlap between the probability distributions that underlie them. We demonstrate the kinds of insights that can be obtained by providing examples of three typical use-cases: comparing ensembles generated with different molecular force fields, assessing convergence in molecular simulations, and calculating differences and similarities in structural ensembles refined with various sources of experimental data. We also demonstrate efficient computational scaling for typical analyses, and robustness against both the size and sampling of the ensembles. ENCORE is freely available and extendable, integrates with the established MDAnalysis software package, reads ensemble data in many common formats, and can work with large trajectory files.

Suggested Citation

  • Matteo Tiberti & Elena Papaleo & Tone Bengtsen & Wouter Boomsma & Kresten Lindorff-Larsen, 2015. "ENCORE: Software for Quantitative Ensemble Comparison," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(10), pages 1-16, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1004415
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004415
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004415
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004415&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004415?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wouter Boomsma & Jesper Ferkinghoff-Borg & Kresten Lindorff-Larsen, 2014. "Combining Experiments and Simulations Using the Maximum Entropy Principle," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(2), pages 1-9, February.
    2. Anders Malmendal & Jarl Underhaug & Daniel E Otzen & Niels C Nielsen, 2010. "Fast Mapping of Global Protein Folding States by Multivariate NMR: A GPS for Proteins," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(4), pages 1-6, April.
    3. Kresten Lindorff-Larsen & Jesper Ferkinghoff-Borg, 2009. "Similarity Measures for Protein Ensembles," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(1), pages 1-13, January.
    4. Kresten Lindorff-Larsen & Robert B. Best & Mark A. DePristo & Christopher M. Dobson & Michele Vendruscolo, 2005. "Simultaneous determination of protein structure and dynamics," Nature, Nature, vol. 433(7022), pages 128-132, January.
    5. Simon Olsson & Jes Frellsen & Wouter Boomsma & Kanti V Mardia & Thomas Hamelryck, 2013. "Inference of Structure Ensembles of Flexible Biomolecules from Sparse, Averaged Data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(11), pages 1-7, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Claudia Lancey & Muhammad Tehseen & Souvika Bakshi & Matthew Percival & Masateru Takahashi & Mohamed A. Sobhy & Vlad S. Raducanu & Kerry Blair & Frederick W. Muskett & Timothy J. Ragan & Ramon Crehuet, 2021. "Cryo-EM structure of human Pol κ bound to DNA and mono-ubiquitylated PCNA," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wouter Boomsma & Jesper Ferkinghoff-Borg & Kresten Lindorff-Larsen, 2014. "Combining Experiments and Simulations Using the Maximum Entropy Principle," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(2), pages 1-9, February.
    2. Sean L Seyler & Avishek Kumar & M F Thorpe & Oliver Beckstein, 2015. "Path Similarity Analysis: A Method for Quantifying Macromolecular Pathways," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(10), pages 1-37, October.
    3. Fernando Martín-García & Elena Papaleo & Paulino Gomez-Puertas & Wouter Boomsma & Kresten Lindorff-Larsen, 2015. "Comparing Molecular Dynamics Force Fields in the Essential Subspace," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-16, March.
    4. Timothy R Lezon & Ivet Bahar, 2010. "Using Entropy Maximization to Understand the Determinants of Structural Dynamics beyond Native Contact Topology," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(6), pages 1-12, June.
    5. Gregory D Friedland & Nils-Alexander Lakomek & Christian Griesinger & Jens Meiler & Tanja Kortemme, 2009. "A Correspondence Between Solution-State Dynamics of an Individual Protein and the Sequence and Conformational Diversity of its Family," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(5), pages 1-16, May.
    6. Anders S Christensen & Troels E Linnet & Mikael Borg & Wouter Boomsma & Kresten Lindorff-Larsen & Thomas Hamelryck & Jan H Jensen, 2013. "Protein Structure Validation and Refinement Using Amide Proton Chemical Shifts Derived from Quantum Mechanics," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(12), pages 1-10, December.
    7. Douglas L Theobald & Deborah S Wuttke, 2008. "Accurate Structural Correlations from Maximum Likelihood Superpositions," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(2), pages 1-8, February.
    8. Nimmi Das Anthuparambil & Anita Girelli & Sonja Timmermann & Marvin Kowalski & Mohammad Sayed Akhundzadeh & Sebastian Retzbach & Maximilian D. Senft & Michelle Dargasz & Dennis Gutmüller & Anusha Hire, 2023. "Exploring non-equilibrium processes and spatio-temporal scaling laws in heated egg yolk using coherent X-rays," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.
    9. Dong Long & Rafael Brüschweiler, 2011. "In Silico Elucidation of the Recognition Dynamics of Ubiquitin," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(4), pages 1-9, April.
    10. Kresten Lindorff-Larsen & Jesper Ferkinghoff-Borg, 2009. "Similarity Measures for Protein Ensembles," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(1), pages 1-13, January.
    11. Kai Wang & Shiyang Long & Pu Tian, 2015. "Hierarchical Conformational Analysis of Native Lysozyme Based on Sub-Millisecond Molecular Dynamics Simulations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-17, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1004415. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.