IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1003369.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Protein-Protein Interactions in a Crowded Environment: An Analysis via Cross-Docking Simulations and Evolutionary Information

Author

Listed:
  • Anne Lopes
  • Sophie Sacquin-Mora
  • Viktoriya Dimitrova
  • Elodie Laine
  • Yann Ponty
  • Alessandra Carbone

Abstract

Large-scale analyses of protein-protein interactions based on coarse-grain molecular docking simulations and binding site predictions resulting from evolutionary sequence analysis, are possible and realizable on hundreds of proteins with variate structures and interfaces. We demonstrated this on the 168 proteins of the Mintseris Benchmark 2.0. On the one hand, we evaluated the quality of the interaction signal and the contribution of docking information compared to evolutionary information showing that the combination of the two improves partner identification. On the other hand, since protein interactions usually occur in crowded environments with several competing partners, we realized a thorough analysis of the interactions of proteins with true partners but also with non-partners to evaluate whether proteins in the environment, competing with the true partner, affect its identification. We found three populations of proteins: strongly competing, never competing, and interacting with different levels of strength. Populations and levels of strength are numerically characterized and provide a signature for the behavior of a protein in the crowded environment. We showed that partner identification, to some extent, does not depend on the competing partners present in the environment, that certain biochemical classes of proteins are intrinsically easier to analyze than others, and that small proteins are not more promiscuous than large ones. Our approach brings to light that the knowledge of the binding site can be used to reduce the high computational cost of docking simulations with no consequence in the quality of the results, demonstrating the possibility to apply coarse-grain docking to datasets made of thousands of proteins. Comparison with all available large-scale analyses aimed to partner predictions is realized. We release the complete decoys set issued by coarse-grain docking simulations of both true and false interacting partners, and their evolutionary sequence analysis leading to binding site predictions. Download site: http://www.lgm.upmc.fr/CCDMintseris/Author Summary: Protein-protein interactions (PPI) are at the heart of the molecular processes governing life and constitute an increasingly important target for drug design. Given their importance, it is vital to determine which protein interactions have functional relevance and to characterize the protein competition inherent to crowded environments, as the cytoplasm or the cellular organelles. We show that combining coarse-grain molecular cross-docking simulations and binding site predictions based on evolutionary sequence analysis is a viable route to identify true interacting partners for hundreds of proteins with a variate set of protein structures and interfaces. Also, we realize a large-scale analysis of protein binding promiscuity and provide a numerical characterization of partner competition and level of interaction strength for about 28000 false-partner interactions. Finally, we demonstrate that binding site prediction is useful to discriminate native partners, but also to scale up the approach to thousands of protein interactions. This study is based on the large computational effort made by thousands of internautes helping World Community Grid over a period of 7 months. The complete dataset issued by the computation and the analysis is released to the scientific community.

Suggested Citation

  • Anne Lopes & Sophie Sacquin-Mora & Viktoriya Dimitrova & Elodie Laine & Yann Ponty & Alessandra Carbone, 2013. "Protein-Protein Interactions in a Crowded Environment: An Analysis via Cross-Docking Simulations and Evolutionary Information," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(12), pages 1-18, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1003369
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003369
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003369
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003369&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003369?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Leland H. Hartwell & John J. Hopfield & Stanislas Leibler & Andrew W. Murray, 1999. "From molecular to modular cell biology," Nature, Nature, vol. 402(6761), pages 47-52, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Krishna Praneeth Kilambi & Kavan Reddy & Jeffrey J Gray, 2014. "Protein-Protein Docking with Dynamic Residue Protonation States," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(12), pages 1-14, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nicola Bellomo & Richard Bingham & Mark A.J. Chaplain & Giovanni Dosi & Guido Forni & Damian A. Knopoff & John Lowengrub & Reidun Twarock & Maria Enrica Virgillito, 2020. "A multi-scale model of virus pandemic: Heterogeneous interactive entities in a globally connected world," LEM Papers Series 2020/16, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    2. Lazaros K Gallos & Fabricio Q Potiguar & José S Andrade Jr & Hernan A Makse, 2013. "IMDB Network Revisited: Unveiling Fractal and Modular Properties from a Typical Small-World Network," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(6), pages 1-8, June.
    3. T. Ochiai & J. C. Nacher, 2007. "Stochastic analysis of autoregulatory gene expression dynamics," Mathematical and Computer Modelling of Dynamical Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(4), pages 377-388, November.
    4. Qing-Ju Jiao & Yan-Kai Zhang & Lu-Ning Li & Hong-Bin Shen, 2011. "BinTree Seeking: A Novel Approach to Mine Both Bi-Sparse and Cohesive Modules in Protein Interaction Networks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(11), pages 1-12, November.
    5. Manfred Füllsack, 2011. "Firstness - As seen from the perspective of Complexity Research," E-LOGOS, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2011(1), pages 1-19.
    6. Romualdo Pastor-Satorras & Eric Smith & Ricard V. Solé, 2002. "Evolving Protein Interaction Networks through Gene Duplication," Working Papers 02-02-008, Santa Fe Institute.
    7. Frederic Li Mow Chee & Bruno Beernaert & Billie G. C. Griffith & Alexander E. P. Loftus & Yatendra Kumar & Jimi C. Wills & Martin Lee & Jessica Valli & Ann P. Wheeler & J. Douglas Armstrong & Maddy Pa, 2023. "Mena regulates nesprin-2 to control actin–nuclear lamina associations, trans-nuclear membrane signalling and gene expression," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-19, December.
    8. Joshua S Weitz & Philip N Benfey & Ned S Wingreen, 2007. "Evolution, Interactions, and Biological Networks," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(1), pages 1-3, January.
    9. Bo Xu & Hongfei Lin & Yang Chen & Zhihao Yang & Hongfang Liu, 2013. "Protein Complex Identification by Integrating Protein-Protein Interaction Evidence from Multiple Sources," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(12), pages 1-12, December.
    10. Miguel Fribourg & Diomedes E Logothetis & Javier González-Maeso & Stuart C Sealfon & Belén Galocha-Iragüen & Fernando Las-Heras Andrés & Vladimir Brezina, 2017. "Elucidation of molecular kinetic schemes from macroscopic traces using system identification," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(2), pages 1-34, February.
    11. Scholtens, Denise & Miron, Alexander & M. Merchant, Faisal & Miller, Arden & L. Miron, Penelope & Dirk Iglehart, J. & Gentleman, Robert, 2004. "Analyzing factorial designed microarray experiments," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 90(1), pages 19-43, July.
    12. Robrecht Cannoodt & Joeri Ruyssinck & Jan Ramon & Katleen De Preter & Yvan Saeys, 2018. "IncGraph: Incremental graphlet counting for topology optimisation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(4), pages 1-11, April.
    13. Margaritis Voliotis & Philipp Thomas & Ramon Grima & Clive G Bowsher, 2016. "Stochastic Simulation of Biomolecular Networks in Dynamic Environments," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(6), pages 1-18, June.
    14. Pilar García-Peñarrubia & Juan J Gálvez & Jesús Gálvez, 2011. "Spatio-Temporal Dependence of the Signaling Response in Immune-Receptor Trafficking Networks Regulated by Cell Density: A Theoretical Model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(7), pages 1-12, July.
    15. Emre Guney & Baldo Oliva, 2014. "Analysis of the Robustness of Network-Based Disease-Gene Prioritization Methods Reveals Redundancy in the Human Interactome and Functional Diversity of Disease-Genes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(4), pages 1-11, April.
    16. Cui, Xue-Mei & Yoon, Chang No & Youn, Hyejin & Lee, Sang Hoon & Jung, Jean S. & Han, Seung Kee, 2017. "Dynamic burstiness of word-occurrence and network modularity in textbook systems," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 487(C), pages 103-110.
    17. Zheng Hong, 2019. "A novel individualized drug repositioning approach for predicting personalized candidate drugs for type 1 diabetes mellitus," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 18(5), pages 1-9, October.
    18. Zhang, Yuerong & Marshall, Stephen & Manley, Ed, 2021. "Understanding the roles of rail stations: Insights from network approaches in the London metropolitan area," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    19. Perc, Matjaž, 2010. "Growth and structure of Slovenia’s scientific collaboration network," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 4(4), pages 475-482.
    20. Krivonosov, Mikhail & Nazarenko, Tatiana & Bacalini, Maria Giulia & Vedunova, Maria & Franceschi, Claudio & Zaikin, Alexey & Ivanchenko, Mikhail, 2022. "Age-related trajectories of DNA methylation network markers: A parenclitic network approach to a family-based cohort of patients with Down Syndrome," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 165(P2).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1003369. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.