IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1000891.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantitative Test of the Barrier Nucleosome Model for Statistical Positioning of Nucleosomes Up- and Downstream of Transcription Start Sites

Author

Listed:
  • Wolfram Möbius
  • Ulrich Gerland

Abstract

The positions of nucleosomes in eukaryotic genomes determine which parts of the DNA sequence are readily accessible for regulatory proteins and which are not. Genome-wide maps of nucleosome positions have revealed a salient pattern around transcription start sites, involving a nucleosome-free region (NFR) flanked by a pronounced periodic pattern in the average nucleosome density. While the periodic pattern clearly reflects well-positioned nucleosomes, the positioning mechanism is less clear. A recent experimental study by Mavrich et al. argued that the pattern observed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is qualitatively consistent with a “barrier nucleosome model,” in which the oscillatory pattern is created by the statistical positioning mechanism of Kornberg and Stryer. On the other hand, there is clear evidence for intrinsic sequence preferences of nucleosomes, and it is unclear to what extent these sequence preferences affect the observed pattern. To test the barrier nucleosome model, we quantitatively analyze yeast nucleosome positioning data both up- and downstream from NFRs. Our analysis is based on the Tonks model of statistical physics which quantifies the interplay between the excluded-volume interaction of nucleosomes and their positional entropy. We find that although the typical patterns on the two sides of the NFR are different, they are both quantitatively described by the same physical model with the same parameters, but different boundary conditions. The inferred boundary conditions suggest that the first nucleosome downstream from the NFR (the +1 nucleosome) is typically directly positioned while the first nucleosome upstream is statistically positioned via a nucleosome-repelling DNA region. These boundary conditions, which can be locally encoded into the genome sequence, significantly shape the statistical distribution of nucleosomes over a range of up to ∼1,000 bp to each side.Author Summary: Within the last five years, knowledge about nucleosome organization on the genome has grown dramatically. To a large extent, this has been achieved by an increasing number of experimental studies determining nucleosome positions at high resolution over entire genomes. Particular attention has been paid to promoter regions, where a canonical pattern has been established: a nucleosome-free region with pronounced adjacent oscillations in the nucleosome density. Here we tested to what extent this pattern may be quantitatively described by a minimal physical model, a one-dimensional gas of impenetrable particles, commonly referred to as the “Tonks gas.” In this model, density oscillations occur close to a boundary at dense packing. Our systematic quantitative analysis reveals that, in an average over many promoters, a Tonks gas model can indeed account for the nucleosome organization to both sides of the nucleosome-free region, if one allows for different boundary conditions at the two edges. On the downstream side, a single nucleosome is typically directly positioned such that it forms an obstacle for the neighboring nucleosomes, while such a barrier nucleosome is typically missing on the upstream side.

Suggested Citation

  • Wolfram Möbius & Ulrich Gerland, 2010. "Quantitative Test of the Barrier Nucleosome Model for Statistical Positioning of Nucleosomes Up- and Downstream of Transcription Start Sites," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(8), pages 1-11, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1000891
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000891
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000891
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000891&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000891?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Istvan Albert & Travis N. Mavrich & Lynn P. Tomsho & Ji Qi & Sara J. Zanton & Stephan C. Schuster & B. Franklin Pugh, 2007. "Translational and rotational settings of H2A.Z nucleosomes across the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome," Nature, Nature, vol. 446(7135), pages 572-576, March.
    2. Guo-Cheng Yuan & Jun S Liu, 2008. "Genomic Sequence Is Highly Predictive of Local Nucleosome Depletion," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(1), pages 1-11, January.
    3. Iestyn Whitehouse & Oliver J. Rando & Jeff Delrow & Toshio Tsukiyama, 2007. "Chromatin remodelling at promoters suppresses antisense transcription," Nature, Nature, vol. 450(7172), pages 1031-1035, December.
    4. Noam Kaplan & Irene K. Moore & Yvonne Fondufe-Mittendorf & Andrea J. Gossett & Desiree Tillo & Yair Field & Emily M. LeProust & Timothy R. Hughes & Jason D. Lieb & Jonathan Widom & Eran Segal, 2009. "The DNA-encoded nucleosome organization of a eukaryotic genome," Nature, Nature, vol. 458(7236), pages 362-366, March.
    5. Eran Segal & Yvonne Fondufe-Mittendorf & Lingyi Chen & AnnChristine Thåström & Yair Field & Irene K. Moore & Ji-Ping Z. Wang & Jonathan Widom, 2006. "A genomic code for nucleosome positioning," Nature, Nature, vol. 442(7104), pages 772-778, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alexander W. Blocker & Edoardo M. Airoldi, 2016. "Template-Based Models for Genome-Wide Analysis of Next-Generation Sequencing Data at Base-Pair Resolution," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 111(515), pages 967-987, July.
    2. Ji-Ping Wang & Yvonne Fondufe-Mittendorf & Liqun Xi & Guei-Feng Tsai & Eran Segal & Jonathan Widom, 2008. "Preferentially Quantized Linker DNA Lengths in Saccharomyces cerevisiae," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(9), pages 1-10, September.
    3. Zing Tsung-Yeh Tsai & Shin-Han Shiu & Huai-Kuang Tsai, 2015. "Contribution of Sequence Motif, Chromatin State, and DNA Structure Features to Predictive Models of Transcription Factor Binding in Yeast," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-22, August.
    4. Moser Carlee & Gupta Mayetri, 2012. "A Generalized Hidden Markov Model for Determining Sequence-based Predictors of Nucleosome Positioning," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 11(2), pages 1-23, January.
    5. Guo-Cheng Yuan & Jun S Liu, 2008. "Genomic Sequence Is Highly Predictive of Local Nucleosome Depletion," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(1), pages 1-11, January.
    6. Wei Chen & Hao Lin & Peng-Mian Feng & Chen Ding & Yong-Chun Zuo & Kuo-Chen Chou, 2012. "iNuc-PhysChem: A Sequence-Based Predictor for Identifying Nucleosomes via Physicochemical Properties," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(10), pages 1-9, October.
    7. Behrouz Eslami-Mossallam & Raoul D Schram & Marco Tompitak & John van Noort & Helmut Schiessel, 2016. "Multiplexing Genetic and Nucleosome Positioning Codes: A Computational Approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(6), pages 1-14, June.
    8. Segal Mark R, 2008. "Re-Cracking the Nucleosome Positioning Code," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 7(1), pages 1-24, April.
    9. Monica Naughtin & Zofia Haftek-Terreau & Johan Xavier & Sam Meyer & Maud Silvain & Yan Jaszczyszyn & Nicolas Levy & Vincent Miele & Mohamed Salah Benleulmi & Marc Ruff & Vincent Parissi & Cédric Vaill, 2015. "DNA Physical Properties and Nucleosome Positions Are Major Determinants of HIV-1 Integrase Selectivity," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-28, June.
    10. Anthony Mathelier & Wyeth W Wasserman, 2013. "The Next Generation of Transcription Factor Binding Site Prediction," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(9), pages 1-18, September.
    11. Leelavati Narlikar & Raluca Gordân & Alexander J Hartemink, 2007. "A Nucleosome-Guided Map of Transcription Factor Binding Sites in Yeast," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(11), pages 1-10, November.
    12. Matti Annala & Kirsti Laurila & Harri Lähdesmäki & Matti Nykter, 2011. "A Linear Model for Transcription Factor Binding Affinity Prediction in Protein Binding Microarrays," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(5), pages 1-13, May.
    13. Meijiang Gao & Marina Veil & Marcus Rosenblatt & Aileen Julia Riesle & Anna Gebhard & Helge Hass & Lenka Buryanova & Lev Y. Yampolsky & Björn Grüning & Sergey V. Ulianov & Jens Timmer & Daria Onichtch, 2022. "Pluripotency factors determine gene expression repertoire at zygotic genome activation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, December.
    14. Joke J F A van Vugt & Martijn de Jager & Magdalena Murawska & Alexander Brehm & John van Noort & Colin Logie, 2009. "Multiple Aspects of ATP-Dependent Nucleosome Translocation by RSC and Mi-2 Are Directed by the Underlying DNA Sequence," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(7), pages 1-14, July.
    15. Fang Liu & Eivind Tøstesen & Jostein K Sundet & Tor-Kristian Jenssen & Christoph Bock & Geir Ivar Jerstad & William G Thilly & Eivind Hovig, 2007. "The Human Genomic Melting Map," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(5), pages 1-13, May.
    16. Aileen Julia Riesle & Meijiang Gao & Marcus Rosenblatt & Jacques Hermes & Helge Hass & Anna Gebhard & Marina Veil & Björn Grüning & Jens Timmer & Daria Onichtchouk, 2023. "Activator-blocker model of transcriptional regulation by pioneer-like factors," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, December.
    17. Jiayi Fan & Andrew T. Moreno & Alexander S. Baier & Joseph J. Loparo & Craig L. Peterson, 2022. "H2A.Z deposition by SWR1C involves multiple ATP-dependent steps," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    18. Iksoo Huh & Isabel Mendizabal & Taesung Park & Soojin V Yi, 2018. "Functional conservation of sequence determinants at rapidly evolving regulatory regions across mammals," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-21, October.
    19. Harsh Nagpal & Ahmad Ali-Ahmad & Yasuhiro Hirano & Wei Cai & Mario Halic & Tatsuo Fukagawa & Nikolina Sekulić & Beat Fierz, 2023. "CENP-A and CENP-B collaborate to create an open centromeric chromatin state," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, December.
    20. Kroll, K.M. & Ferrantini, A. & Domany, E., 2010. "Introduction to biology and chromosomal instabilities in cancer," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 389(20), pages 4374-4388.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1000891. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.