IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1006451.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Functional conservation of sequence determinants at rapidly evolving regulatory regions across mammals

Author

Listed:
  • Iksoo Huh
  • Isabel Mendizabal
  • Taesung Park
  • Soojin V Yi

Abstract

Recent advances in epigenomics have made it possible to map genome-wide regulatory regions using empirical methods. Subsequent comparative epigenomic studies have revealed that regulatory regions diverge rapidly between genome of different species, and that the divergence is more pronounced in enhancers than in promoters. To understand genomic changes underlying these patterns, we investigated if we can identify specific sequence fragments that are over-enriched in regulatory regions, thus potentially contributing to regulatory functions of such regions. Here we report numerous sequence fragments that are statistically over-enriched in enhancers and promoters of different mammals (which we refer to as ‘sequence determinants’). Interestingly, the degree of statistical enrichment, which presumably is associated with the degree of regulatory impacts of the specific sequence determinant, was significantly higher for promoter sequence determinants than enhancer sequence determinants. We further used a machine learning method to construct prediction models using sequence determinants. Remarkably, prediction models constructed from one species could be used to predict regulatory regions of other species with high accuracy. This observation indicates that even though the precise locations of regulatory regions diverge rapidly during evolution, the functional potential of sequence determinants underlying regulatory sequences may be conserved between species.Author summary: Regions of the genome that do not encode genes but affect expression of other genes, such as enhancers and promoters, are referred to as regulatory regions. Because of their regulatory functions, it was thought that enhancers and promoters should be evolutionarily conserved. Regulatory regions can be now epigenomically identified because they are marked by specific modifications of histone tails at the chromatin level. Interestingly, when we compare epigenomically identified regulatory regions from different mammals, the specific positions of regulatory regions are often divergent between species. Enhancers in particular are highly divergent between species. In this study, we show that we can find sequence fragments that are statistically enriched in enhancers and promoters of different species, and that the degree of statistical enrichment can explain different levels of evolutionary sequence conservation between enhancers and promoters. We further constructed predictive models of enhancers and promoters using the enriched sequence fragments, and show that these models can not only accurately predict enhancers and promoters of the same species, but works comparably well when applied to other species. These results indicate that even though the specific positions of regulatory regions have diverged between species, the functions of sequence fragments that comprise those regions may be conserved.

Suggested Citation

  • Iksoo Huh & Isabel Mendizabal & Taesung Park & Soojin V Yi, 2018. "Functional conservation of sequence determinants at rapidly evolving regulatory regions across mammals," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-21, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1006451
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006451
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006451
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006451&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006451?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Len A. Pennacchio & Nadav Ahituv & Alan M. Moses & Shyam Prabhakar & Marcelo A. Nobrega & Malak Shoukry & Simon Minovitsky & Inna Dubchak & Amy Holt & Keith D. Lewis & Ingrid Plajzer-Frick & Jennifer , 2006. "In vivo enhancer analysis of human conserved non-coding sequences," Nature, Nature, vol. 444(7118), pages 499-502, November.
    2. Michael Z. Ludwig & Casey Bergman & Nipam H. Patel & Martin Kreitman, 2000. "Evidence for stabilizing selection in a eukaryotic enhancer element," Nature, Nature, vol. 403(6769), pages 564-567, February.
    3. Helena Santos-Rosa & Robert Schneider & Andrew J. Bannister & Julia Sherriff & Bradley E. Bernstein & N. C. Tolga Emre & Stuart L. Schreiber & Jane Mellor & Tony Kouzarides, 2002. "Active genes are tri-methylated at K4 of histone H3," Nature, Nature, vol. 419(6905), pages 407-411, September.
    4. Annie E. Tsong & Brian B. Tuch & Hao Li & Alexander D. Johnson, 2006. "Evolution of alternative transcriptional circuits with identical logic," Nature, Nature, vol. 443(7110), pages 415-420, September.
    5. Guo-Cheng Yuan & Jun S Liu, 2008. "Genomic Sequence Is Highly Predictive of Local Nucleosome Depletion," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(1), pages 1-11, January.
    6. Friedman, Jerome H. & Hastie, Trevor & Tibshirani, Rob, 2010. "Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 33(i01).
    7. Jacob F. Degner & Athma A. Pai & Roger Pique-Regi & Jean-Baptiste Veyrieras & Daniel J. Gaffney & Joseph K. Pickrell & Sherryl De Leon & Katelyn Michelini & Noah Lewellen & Gregory E. Crawford & Matth, 2012. "DNase I sensitivity QTLs are a major determinant of human expression variation," Nature, Nature, vol. 482(7385), pages 390-394, February.
    8. Hui Zou & Trevor Hastie, 2005. "Addendum: Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 67(5), pages 768-768, November.
    9. Hui Zou & Trevor Hastie, 2005. "Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 67(2), pages 301-320, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tutz, Gerhard & Pößnecker, Wolfgang & Uhlmann, Lorenz, 2015. "Variable selection in general multinomial logit models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 207-222.
    2. Mkhadri, Abdallah & Ouhourane, Mohamed, 2013. "An extended variable inclusion and shrinkage algorithm for correlated variables," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 631-644.
    3. Susan Athey & Guido W. Imbens & Stefan Wager, 2018. "Approximate residual balancing: debiased inference of average treatment effects in high dimensions," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 80(4), pages 597-623, September.
    4. Christopher J Greenwood & George J Youssef & Primrose Letcher & Jacqui A Macdonald & Lauryn J Hagg & Ann Sanson & Jenn Mcintosh & Delyse M Hutchinson & John W Toumbourou & Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz &, 2020. "A comparison of penalised regression methods for informing the selection of predictive markers," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-14, November.
    5. Immanuel Bayer & Philip Groth & Sebastian Schneckener, 2013. "Prediction Errors in Learning Drug Response from Gene Expression Data – Influence of Labeling, Sample Size, and Machine Learning Algorithm," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(7), pages 1-13, July.
    6. Mostafa Rezaei & Ivor Cribben & Michele Samorani, 2021. "A clustering-based feature selection method for automatically generated relational attributes," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 303(1), pages 233-263, August.
    7. Gustavo A. Alonso-Silverio & Víctor Francisco-García & Iris P. Guzmán-Guzmán & Elías Ventura-Molina & Antonio Alarcón-Paredes, 2021. "Toward Non-Invasive Estimation of Blood Glucose Concentration: A Comparative Performance," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(20), pages 1-13, October.
    8. Christopher Kath & Florian Ziel, 2018. "The value of forecasts: Quantifying the economic gains of accurate quarter-hourly electricity price forecasts," Papers 1811.08604, arXiv.org.
    9. Karim Barigou & Stéphane Loisel & Yahia Salhi, 2020. "Parsimonious Predictive Mortality Modeling by Regularization and Cross-Validation with and without Covid-Type Effect," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-18, December.
    10. Gurgul Henryk & Machno Artur, 2017. "Trade Pattern on Warsaw Stock Exchange and Prediction of Number of Trades," Statistics in Transition New Series, Polish Statistical Association, vol. 18(1), pages 91-114, March.
    11. Michael Funke & Kadri Männasoo & Helery Tasane, 2023. "Regional Economic Impacts of the Øresund Cross-Border Fixed Link: Cui Bono?," CESifo Working Paper Series 10557, CESifo.
    12. Camila Epprecht & Dominique Guegan & Álvaro Veiga & Joel Correa da Rosa, 2017. "Variable selection and forecasting via automated methods for linear models: LASSO/adaLASSO and Autometrics," Post-Print halshs-00917797, HAL.
    13. Zichen Zhang & Ye Eun Bae & Jonathan R. Bradley & Lang Wu & Chong Wu, 2022. "SUMMIT: An integrative approach for better transcriptomic data imputation improves causal gene identification," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.
    14. Štefan Lyócsa & Petra Vašaničová & Branka Hadji Misheva & Marko Dávid Vateha, 2022. "Default or profit scoring credit systems? Evidence from European and US peer-to-peer lending markets," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 1-21, December.
    15. Peter Bühlmann & Jacopo Mandozzi, 2014. "High-dimensional variable screening and bias in subsequent inference, with an empirical comparison," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 407-430, June.
    16. Peter Martey Addo & Dominique Guegan & Bertrand Hassani, 2018. "Credit Risk Analysis Using Machine and Deep Learning Models," Risks, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-20, April.
    17. Capanu, Marinela & Giurcanu, Mihai & Begg, Colin B. & Gönen, Mithat, 2023. "Subsampling based variable selection for generalized linear models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    18. Abhinav Kaushik & Diane Dunham & Xiaorui Han & Evan Do & Sandra Andorf & Sheena Gupta & Andrea Fernandes & Laurie Elizabeth Kost & Sayantani B. Sindher & Wong Yu & Mindy Tsai & Robert Tibshirani & Sco, 2022. "CD8+ T cell differentiation status correlates with the feasibility of sustained unresponsiveness following oral immunotherapy," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.
    19. Tomáš Plíhal, 2021. "Scheduled macroeconomic news announcements and Forex volatility forecasting," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(8), pages 1379-1397, December.
    20. Michele Lalla & Patrizio Frederic, 2020. "Tertiary education decisions of immigrants and non-immigrants in Italy: an empirical approach," Department of Economics 0168, University of Modena and Reggio E., Faculty of Economics "Marco Biagi".

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1006451. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.