IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pes/ieroec/v11y2020i3p549-569.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gender difference in corporate social responsibility implementation in Lithuanian SMEs

Author

Listed:
  • Jintao Lu

    (Taiyuan University of Science and Technology, China)

  • Licheng Ren

    (Taiyuan University of Science and Technology, China)

  • Chong Zhang

    (Taiyuan University of Science and Technology, China)

  • Chunyan Wang

    (Taiyuan University of Science and Technology, China)

  • Nijole Petkeviciute

    (Vytautas Magnus University, Lithuania)

  • Justas Streimikis

    (Lithuanian Institute of Agrarian Economics, Lithuania, University of Economics and Human Science in Warsaw, Poland)

Abstract

Research background: There are many scientific papers dealing with the challenges of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) implementation at the company level. However, there are few studies dealing with gender difference between female and male managers in the perception towards CSR initiative. Purpose of the article: To understand the differences between male and female managers’ behaviour in the process of CSR implementation in companies. Methods: A survey of managers at different levels in Lithuanian Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) was performed in 2019. The study focused on the female and male respondents’ answers to the participation in CSR implementation, their perception about CSR implementation and the most important issues for them in that process. Findings & Value added: The results of the study indicated that, compared to their male counterparts, female respondents highlighted different factors having impact on successful implementation of CSR initiatives. Female managers were more convinced to the benefits of CSR practices than their male counter-parts. The “Communication skills” were defined as the most important for implementing CSR strategy for the females and “Understanding of CSR strategy” for males. For most of the female managers, “Sociality” was the most important competence necessary for a leader, followed by “Global and holistic thinking”, however, the male respondents were more doubtful about all the necessary competencies for a sustainability leader. The main theoretical value added of the paper is elicitation of the differences between male and female managers in the perception of CSR initiatives and necessary skills of a leader for implementing these initiatives in SMEs. The practical and managerial implications were also provided for the strengthening of the CSR activities in SMEs.

Suggested Citation

  • Jintao Lu & Licheng Ren & Chong Zhang & Chunyan Wang & Nijole Petkeviciute & Justas Streimikis, 2020. "Gender difference in corporate social responsibility implementation in Lithuanian SMEs," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 11(3), pages 549-569, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:pes:ieroec:v:11:y:2020:i:3:p:549-569
    DOI: 10.24136/oc.2020.023
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.24136/oc.2020.023
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24136/oc.2020.023?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jelena Titko & Anna Svirina & Tatjana Tambovceva & Viktorija Skvarciany, 2021. "Differences in Attitude to Corporate Social Responsibility among Generations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-12, October.
    2. Joanna Sawicka & Elżbieta Marcinkowska, 2023. "Environmental CSR and the Purchase Declarations of Generation Z Consumers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-14, August.
    3. Mariasole Bannò & Emilia Filippi & Sandro Trento, 2023. "Women in top echelon positions and their effects on sustainability: a review, synthesis and future research agenda," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 27(1), pages 181-251, March.
    4. Wadim Strielkowski & Elena Tarkhanova & Natalia Baburina & Justas Streimikis, 2021. "Corporate Social Responsibility and the Renewable Energy Development in the Baltic States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-18, September.
    5. Maximillian M. J. Kapa & Agus A. Nalle & Paul G. Tamelan & Worakamol Wisetsri, 2022. "The Impact of Green Finance, Agriculture Growth and Creativity on Carbon Emissions of High Carbon Emissions Producing Countries," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 12(5), pages 432-440, September.
    6. Lukman Yunus & Marsuki Iswandi & La Baco & Munirwan Zani & Muhammad Aswar Limi & Sujono Sujono, 2023. "How Does Sustainable Energy System, Creativity, and Green Finance affect Environment Efficiency and Sustainable Economic Growth: Evidence from Highest Emitting Economies," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 13(1), pages 261-270, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Corporate Social Responsibility; perceptions of CSR; gender diversity; senior managers; SMEs;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M50 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Personnel Economics - - - General
    • Q01 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General - - - Sustainable Development
    • Q35 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Nonrenewable Resources and Conservation - - - Hydrocarbon Resources
    • Q51 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Valuation of Environmental Effects

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pes:ieroec:v:11:y:2020:i:3:p:549-569. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Adam P. Balcerzak (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ibgtopl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.