IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/jorsoc/v57y2006i3d10.1057_palgrave.jors.2601986.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal production time and number of maintenance actions for an imperfect production system under equal-interval maintenance policy

Author

Listed:
  • Chih-Hsiung Wang

    (I-Shou University)

  • Ruey Huei Yeh

    (National Taiwan University of Science and Technology)

  • Peitsang Wu

    (I-Shou University)

Abstract

This paper deals with the optimal production/maintenance (PM) policy for a deteriorating production system which may shift from the in-control state to the out-of-control state while producing items. The process is assumed to have a general shift distribution. Under the commonly used maintenance policy, equal-interval maintenance, the joint optimizations of the PM policy are derived such that the expected total cost per unit time is minimized. Different conditions for optimality, lower and upper bounds and uniqueness properties on the optimal PM policy are provided. The implications of another commonly used policy, to perform a maintenance action only at the end of the production run, are also discussed. Structural properties for the optimal policy are established so that an efficient solution procedure is obtained. In the exponential case, some extensions of the results obtained previously in the literature are presented. A numerical example is provided to illustrate the solution procedure for the optimal production and maintenance policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Chih-Hsiung Wang & Ruey Huei Yeh & Peitsang Wu, 2006. "Optimal production time and number of maintenance actions for an imperfect production system under equal-interval maintenance policy," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 57(3), pages 262-270, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:jorsoc:v:57:y:2006:i:3:d:10.1057_palgrave.jors.2601986
    DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601986
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601986
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601986?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Hongzhou, 2002. "A survey of maintenance policies of deteriorating systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(3), pages 469-489, June.
    2. Hau L. Lee & Meir J. Rosenblatt, 1987. "Simultaneous Determination of Production Cycle and Inspection Schedules in a Production System," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(9), pages 1125-1136, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. John E. Fontecha & Oscar O. Guaje & Daniel Duque & Raha Akhavan-Tabatabaei & Juan P. Rodríguez & Andrés L. Medaglia, 2020. "Combined maintenance and routing optimization for large-scale sewage cleaning," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 286(1), pages 441-474, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Budai-Balke, G. & Dekker, R. & Nicolai, R.P., 2006. "A review of planning models for maintenance and production," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2006-44, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    2. Kazaz, Burak & Sloan, Thomas W., 2013. "The impact of process deterioration on production and maintenance policies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 227(1), pages 88-100.
    3. David L. Kaufman & Mark E. Lewis, 2007. "Machine maintenance with workload considerations," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(7), pages 750-766, October.
    4. Borrero, J.S. & Akhavan-Tabatabaei, R., 2013. "Time and inventory dependent optimal maintenance policies for single machine workstations: An MDP approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 228(3), pages 545-555.
    5. Xiang, Yisha, 2013. "Joint optimization of X¯ control chart and preventive maintenance policies: A discrete-time Markov chain approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 229(2), pages 382-390.
    6. Seyed Habib A. Rahmati & Abbas Ahmadi & Kannan Govindan, 2018. "A novel integrated condition-based maintenance and stochastic flexible job shop scheduling problem: simulation-based optimization approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 269(1), pages 583-621, October.
    7. Finkelstein, Maxim & Cha, Ji Hwan & Langston, Amy, 2023. "Improving classical optimal age-replacement policies for degrading items," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    8. Zhengxin Zhang & Xiaosheng Si & Changhua Hu & Xiangyu Kong, 2015. "Degradation modeling–based remaining useful life estimation: A review on approaches for systems with heterogeneity," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 229(4), pages 343-355, August.
    9. Maria R. Ibanez & Michael W. Toffel, 2020. "How Scheduling Can Bias Quality Assessment: Evidence from Food-Safety Inspections," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(6), pages 2396-2416, June.
    10. Ji Hwan Cha & Maxim Finkelstein, 2020. "On optimal life extension for degrading systems," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 234(3), pages 487-495, June.
    11. B. C. Giri & T Chakraborty, 2007. "Optimal production, maintenance, and warranty strategies for item sold with rebate combination warranty," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 221(4), pages 257-264, December.
    12. Yu, Hong-Fwu & Yu, Wen-Ching, 2007. "An optimal mixed policy of inspection and burn-in and the optimal production quantity," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(2), pages 483-491, February.
    13. Hu, Fei & Zong, Qun, 2009. "Optimal production run time for a deteriorating production system under an extended inspection policy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(3), pages 979-986, August.
    14. Min-Tsai Lai, 2007. "Periodical Replacement Model for a Multi-Unit System Subject to Failure Rate Interaction," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 401-411, June.
    15. B C Giri & T Dohi, 2005. "Exact formulation of stochastic EMQ model for an unreliable production system," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 56(5), pages 563-575, May.
    16. John E. Fontecha & Oscar O. Guaje & Daniel Duque & Raha Akhavan-Tabatabaei & Juan P. Rodríguez & Andrés L. Medaglia, 2020. "Combined maintenance and routing optimization for large-scale sewage cleaning," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 286(1), pages 441-474, March.
    17. Dimitrakos, T.D. & Kyriakidis, E.G., 2008. "A semi-Markov decision algorithm for the maintenance of a production system with buffer capacity and continuous repair times," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(2), pages 752-762, February.
    18. Ali Salmasnia & Ali Talesh-Kazemi, 2022. "Integrating inventory planning, pricing and maintenance for perishable products in a two-component parallel manufacturing system with common cause failures," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 1235-1265, April.
    19. Liu, Gehui & Chen, Shaokuan & Ho, Tinkin & Ran, Xinchen & Mao, Baohua & Lan, Zhen, 2022. "Optimum opportunistic maintenance schedule over variable horizons considering multi-stage degradation and dynamic strategy," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    20. Tang, Kwei & Gong, Linguo & Chang, Dong-Shang, 2003. "Optimal process control policies under a time-varying cost structure," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(1), pages 197-210, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:jorsoc:v:57:y:2006:i:3:d:10.1057_palgrave.jors.2601986. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.