IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/jorsoc/v51y2000i5d10.1057_palgrave.jors.2600940.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Machine duplication and part subcontracting in the presence of alternative cell locations in manufacturing cell design

Author

Listed:
  • R Logendran

    (Oregon State University)

  • V Sirikrai

    (Oregon State University)

Abstract

In this paper a model and a solution algorithm are reported to simultaneously deal with the processes of machine duplication and part subcontracting in the presence of two significant design issues in cellular manufacturing systems: (i) alternative cell locations; and (ii) the maximum number of machines assigned to a cell. As the problem, formulated as a polynomial programming model, is shown NP-hard in the strong sense, a higher-level heuristic algorithm based upon a concept known as ‘tabu search’ is presented. An example (small) problem is solved to demonstrate the functionality of the algorithm. Additionally, the small problem is solved for its optimal solution under different scenarios, both with linear single-row and linear double-row layout arrangements, and the solutions obtained are shown to match with those obtained with the heuristic algorithm. A comparison of six different versions of tabu search-based heuristics (TSH 1–TSH 6) is performed to investigate the impact of long-term memory and the use of fixed versus variable tabu-list sizes. A carefully constructed statistical experiment, based on randomised complete-block design, is used to test the performance on three different problem structures, classified as small, medium and large. The results show that TSH 6 with variable tabu-list size and long-term memory based on minimal frequencies is preferred for the single-row layout, while TSH 4 with variable tabu-list size and no long-term memory is preferred for the double-row layout. When subject to budgetary restrictions, the proposed approach can be used by parts manufacturing companies to determine which of the following three actions should be undertaken for each bottleneck part: bottleneck part left as in the initial solution, all the bottleneck machines connected to it are duplicated, or the part subcontracted.

Suggested Citation

  • R Logendran & V Sirikrai, 2000. "Machine duplication and part subcontracting in the presence of alternative cell locations in manufacturing cell design," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 51(5), pages 609-624, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:jorsoc:v:51:y:2000:i:5:d:10.1057_palgrave.jors.2600940
    DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600940
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600940
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600940?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Logendran, Rasaratnam & deSzoeke, Paula & Barnard, Faith, 2006. "Sequence-dependent group scheduling problems in flexible flow shops," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(1), pages 66-86, July.
    2. Antonio Costa & Fulvio Antonio Cappadonna & Sergio Fichera, 2017. "A hybrid genetic algorithm for minimizing makespan in a flow-shop sequence-dependent group scheduling problem," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 28(6), pages 1269-1283, August.
    3. Logendran, Rasaratnam & Carson, Sara & Hanson, Erik, 2005. "Group scheduling in flexible flow shops," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(2), pages 143-155, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:jorsoc:v:51:y:2000:i:5:d:10.1057_palgrave.jors.2600940. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.