IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/jmarka/v11y2023i4d10.1057_s41270-022-00185-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving customer segmentation via classification of key accounts as outliers

Author

Listed:
  • Jan Michael Spoor

    (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology)

Abstract

Customer segmentation and key account management are important use cases for clustering algorithms. Here, a data set of a Portuguese wholesaler for food and household supplies is used as an exemplary application. To increase the quality of the analysis, a two-stage approach is proposed. First, key accounts are filtered by a density-based outlier detection. Second, a Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) is applied to cluster smaller customers. This two-stage approach is aligned with the business implications of key accounts as outstanding and very differently behaving customers as well as with the core idea of an ABC analysis. Also, the exclusion of key accounts corresponds to the definition of outliers as the results of a different underlying mechanism. Using this two-stage approach shows better clustering results compared to using a one-stage approach applying only a GMM. Therefore, it is concluded that density-based detection of key accounts followed by a clustering using a GMM is beneficial for customer segmentation within B2B applications.

Suggested Citation

  • Jan Michael Spoor, 2023. "Improving customer segmentation via classification of key accounts as outliers," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(4), pages 747-760, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:jmarka:v:11:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1057_s41270-022-00185-4
    DOI: 10.1057/s41270-022-00185-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41270-022-00185-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41270-022-00185-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alfred Ultsch & Jörn Lötsch, 2015. "Computed ABC Analysis for Rational Selection of Most Informative Variables in Multivariate Data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-15, June.
    2. Ernst Wit & Edwin van den Heuvel & Jan-Willem Romeijn, 2012. "‘All models are wrong...’: an introduction to model uncertainty," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 66(3), pages 217-236, August.
    3. Susan Brudvig & Michael J. Brusco & J. Dennis Cradit, 2019. "Joint selection of variables and clusters: recovering the underlying structure of marketing data," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-12, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Francisco Richter & Bart Haegeman & Rampal S. Etienne & Ernst C. Wit, 2020. "Introducing a general class of species diversification models for phylogenetic trees," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 74(3), pages 261-274, August.
    2. Marina Johnson & Abdullah Albizri & Serhat Simsek, 2022. "Artificial intelligence in healthcare operations to enhance treatment outcomes: a framework to predict lung cancer prognosis," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 308(1), pages 275-305, January.
    3. Muhammad Ali Musarat & Wesam Salah Alaloul & Muhammad Babar Ali Rabbani & Mujahid Ali & Muhammad Altaf & Roman Fediuk & Nikolai Vatin & Sergey Klyuev & Hamna Bukhari & Alishba Sadiq & Waqas Rafiq & Wa, 2021. "Kabul River Flow Prediction Using Automated ARIMA Forecasting: A Machine Learning Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-26, September.
    4. Ge Song & Jiahui Yuan & Charlie Cheng-Jie Ji, 2021. "Application of Gibbs Sampling in Modelling the Utilization Rate of Raw Materials for Drug Coating," International Journal of Statistics and Probability, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(2), pages 1-28, March.
    5. Natálie Veselá & Volodymyr Rodchenko & David Hampel, 2022. "On the Investment Attractiveness of Ukrainian Companies," European Journal of Business Science and Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Faculty of Business and Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 54-71.
    6. Välilä, Timo, 2020. "Infrastructure and growth: A survey of macro-econometric research," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 39-49.
    7. Jan Dvorsky & Martin Cepel & Gabriela Sopkova & Anna Kotaskova, 2017. "The Quality Of Macro-Environment And Business Environment And University Student Entrepreneurship - Comparison Of The Czech And The Slovak Republic," International Journal of Entrepreneurial Knowledge, Center for International Scientific Research of VSO and VSPP, vol. 5(2), pages 89-100, December.
    8. Seonghun Lee & Jaehwa Park, 2022. "A Vector Representation of Lactation Curves for Dairy Cows," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-13, March.
    9. Dirke Imig & Nadine Pollak & Frank Allgöwer & Markus Rehm, 2020. "Sample-based modeling reveals bidirectional interplay between cell cycle progression and extrinsic apoptosis," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(6), pages 1-17, June.
    10. Karel Slintak & Jan Dvorsky, 2019. "The Purpose of Firms and its Influence on Formulating Their Missions and Visions," Montenegrin Journal of Economics, Economic Laboratory for Transition Research (ELIT), vol. 15(2), pages 15-29.
    11. David Schuff & Karen Corral & Robert D. St. Louis & Greg Schymik, 2018. "Enabling self-service BI: A methodology and a case study for a model management warehouse," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 275-288, April.
    12. Wenchen Liu & Yincai Tang & Ancha Xu, 2021. "Zero-and-one-inflated Poisson regression model," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 62(2), pages 915-934, April.
    13. Vinciotti Veronica & Augugliaro Luigi & Abbruzzo Antonino & Wit Ernst C., 2016. "Model selection for factorial Gaussian graphical models with an application to dynamic regulatory networks," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 15(3), pages 193-212, June.
    14. Homa Razmkhah & Alireza Fararouie & Amin Rostami Ravari, 2022. "Multivariate Flood Frequency Analysis Using Bivariate Copula Functions," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(2), pages 729-743, January.
    15. Marco Vriens & Nathan Bosch & Chad Vidden & Jason Talwar, 2022. "Prediction and profitability in market segmentation typing tools," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(4), pages 360-389, December.
    16. Wit, Ernst C., 2018. "Big data and biostatistics: The death of the asymptotic Valhalla," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 30-33.
    17. Huijian Dong & Xiaomin Guo & Han Reichgelt & Ruizhi Hu, 2020. "Predictive power of ARIMA models in forecasting equity returns: a sliding window method," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(6), pages 549-566, October.
    18. O’Brien, Travis A. & Kashinath, Karthik & Cavanaugh, Nicholas R. & Collins, William D. & O’Brien, John P., 2016. "A fast and objective multidimensional kernel density estimation method: fastKDE," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 148-160.
    19. David Schuff & Karen Corral & Robert D. St. Louis & Greg Schymik, 0. "Enabling self-service BI: A methodology and a case study for a model management warehouse," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-14.
    20. Mathias Drton & Martyn Plummer, 2017. "A Bayesian information criterion for singular models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 79(2), pages 323-380, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:jmarka:v:11:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1057_s41270-022-00185-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.