IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/jbkreg/v18y2017i2d10.1057_s41261-016-0005-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A jurisdictional comparison of the twin peaks model of financial regulation

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew Godwin

    (The University of Melbourne)

  • Timothy Howse

    (The University of Melbourne)

  • Ian Ramsay

    (The University of Melbourne)

Abstract

The last two decades have seen an increasing number of jurisdictions adopting the ‘twin peaks’ model of financial regulation. Since it was pioneered in Australia, the model has been adopted by the Netherlands, Belgium, New Zealand and the United Kingdom. South Africa is currently in the process of changing its model, and it has also been considered by the US. This paper evaluates the twin peaks model as it has been adopted in these jurisdictions and investigates the extent to which there is uniformity in its design and implementation from a regulatory perspective. The comparative analysis indicates that there are many variations in the design of a twin peaks model and that there is no archetypal twin peaks model. In particular, choices need to be made around key elements in areas such as structural design, operational independence and regulatory coordination.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew Godwin & Timothy Howse & Ian Ramsay, 2017. "A jurisdictional comparison of the twin peaks model of financial regulation," Journal of Banking Regulation, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 18(2), pages 103-131, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:jbkreg:v:18:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1057_s41261-016-0005-0
    DOI: 10.1057/s41261-016-0005-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41261-016-0005-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41261-016-0005-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. International Monetary Fund, 2011. "Kingdom of Netherlands: Netherlands: Financial System Stability Assessment," IMF Staff Country Reports 2011/144, International Monetary Fund.
    2. Toby Fiennes & Cavan O'Connor-Close, 2012. "The evolution of prudential supervision in New Zealand," Reserve Bank of New Zealand Bulletin, Reserve Bank of New Zealand, vol. 75, pages 5-13, March.
    3. International Monetary Fund, 2012. "Czech Republic: Detailed Assessment of Observance of Basel Core Principles for Effective Banking Supervision," IMF Staff Country Reports 2012/172, International Monetary Fund.
    4. International Monetary Fund, 2012. "Mexico: Detailed Assessment of Observance of Basel Core Principles," IMF Staff Country Reports 2012/066, International Monetary Fund.
    5. A. Joanne Kellermann & Jakob de Haan & Femke de Vries (ed.), 2013. "Financial Supervision in the 21st Century," Springer Books, Springer, edition 127, number 978-3-642-36733-5, November.
    6. International Monetary Fund, 2013. "Belgium: Technical Note on Securities Markets Regulation and Supervision," IMF Staff Country Reports 2013/136, International Monetary Fund.
    7. International Monetary Fund, 2011. "Kingdom of the Netherlands-Netherlands: Publication of Financial Sector Assessment Program Documentation: Detailed Assessment of Observance on IOSCO Principles and Objectives of Securities Regulation," IMF Staff Country Reports 2011/204, International Monetary Fund.
    8. Murphy, Emma & Senior, Stephen, 2013. "Changes to the Bank of England," Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin, Bank of England, vol. 53(1), pages 20-28.
    9. International Monetary Fund, 2011. "Kingdom of the Netherlands-Netherlands: Publication of Financial Sector Assessment Program Documentation: Detailed Assessment of Observance on Insurance Core Principles," IMF Staff Country Reports 2011/205, International Monetary Fund.
    10. International Monetary Fund, 2012. "Australia: Financial System Stability Assessment," IMF Staff Country Reports 2012/308, International Monetary Fund.
    11. International Monetary Fund, 2011. "Germany: Financial Sector Assessment Program: Detailed Assessment of Observance of IOSCO Objectives and Principles of Securities Regulations," IMF Staff Country Reports 2011/274, International Monetary Fund.
    12. International Monetary Fund, 2011. "Guernsey: Financial Sector Assessment Program Update-Detailed Assessment of Observance on Insurance Core Principles," IMF Staff Country Reports 2011/002, International Monetary Fund.
    13. International Monetary Fund, 2011. "United Kingdom: Financial System Stability Assessment," IMF Staff Country Reports 2011/222, International Monetary Fund.
    14. International Monetary Fund, 2011. "United Kingdom: IOSCO Objectives and Principles of Securities Regulation: Detailed Assessment of Implementation," IMF Staff Country Reports 2011/232, International Monetary Fund.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aleksandra Nadolska, 2022. "Czy Polska potrzebuje nadzoru finansowego typu Twin Peaks?," Bank i Kredyt, Narodowy Bank Polski, vol. 53(2), pages 203-230.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cummings, James R. & Durrani, Kassim J., 2016. "Effect of the Basel Accord capital requirements on the loan-loss provisioning practices of Australian banks," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 23-36.
    2. José Américo Pereira Antunes & Claudio Oliveira De Moraes & Gabriel Caldas Montes, 2016. "Bank Regulatory Capital, Risk-Taking Channel And Monetary Policy: Evidence From An Inflation Targeting Emerging Economy," Anais do XLIII Encontro Nacional de Economia [Proceedings of the 43rd Brazilian Economics Meeting] 042, ANPEC - Associação Nacional dos Centros de Pós-Graduação em Economia [Brazilian Association of Graduate Programs in Economics].
    3. Adela Socol, 2012. "Ifrs Adopting Process In Romanian Banks - Impact On Independent Audit Of Financial Statements," Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, Faculty of Sciences, "1 Decembrie 1918" University, Alba Iulia, vol. 2(14), pages 1-12.
    4. Liliana DONATH & Veronica MIHUTESCU CERNA & Ionela OPREA, 2014. "Financial Supervision Arrangements: Experience And Perspectives," Journal of Public Administration, Finance and Law, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 0(Special i), pages 25-30, September.
    5. Yanotti, Maria Belen, 2013. "A review of the Australian mortgage market," Working Papers 2014-01, University of Tasmania, Tasmanian School of Business and Economics, revised 01 Aug 2013.
    6. England, David & Hebden, Andrew & Henderson, Tom & Pattie, Tom, 2015. "The Agencies and 'One Bank'," Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin, Bank of England, vol. 55(1), pages 47-55.
    7. Rehlon, Amandeep & Nixon, Dan, 2013. "Central counterparties: what are they, why do they matter and how does the Bank supervise them?," Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin, Bank of England, vol. 53(2), pages 147-156.
    8. Chris Hunt, 2016. "The 2016 New Zealand Financial Sector Assessment Programme (FSAP)," Reserve Bank of New Zealand Bulletin, Reserve Bank of New Zealand, vol. 79, pages 1-17, April.
    9. Suss, Joel & Bholat, David & Gillespie, Alex & Reader, Tom, 2021. "Organisational culture and bank risk," Bank of England working papers 912, Bank of England.
    10. Farag, Marc & Harland , Damian & Nixon, Dan, 2013. "Bank capital and liquidity," Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin, Bank of England, vol. 53(3), pages 201-215.
    11. Hills, Robert & Hooley, John & Korniyenko, Yevgeniya & Wieladek, Tomasz, 2015. "International banking and liquidity risk transmission: lessons from the United Kingdom," Bank of England working papers 562, Bank of England.
    12. Finan, Kevin & Lasaosa, Ana & Sunderland, Jamie, 2013. "Tiering in CHAPS," Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin, Bank of England, vol. 53(4), pages 371-378.
    13. Footman, John, 2014. "The Court of the Bank of England," Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin, Bank of England, vol. 54(1), pages 28-36.
    14. Nicolò Fraccaroli & Alessandro Giovannini & Jean-François Jamet & Eric Persson, 2023. "Central Banks in Parliaments: A Text Analysis of the Parliamentary Hearings of the Bank of England, the European Central Bank, and the Federal Reserve," International Journal of Central Banking, International Journal of Central Banking, vol. 19(2), pages 543-600, June.
    15. John Dooley & Dieter Gramlich & Mikhail V. Oet & Stephen J. Ong & Peter Sarlin, 2015. "Evaluating the Information Value for Measures of Systemic Conditions," Working Papers (Old Series) 1513, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland.
    16. Mr. Ashraf Khan, 2016. "Central Bank Governance and the Role of Nonfinancial Risk Management," IMF Working Papers 2016/034, International Monetary Fund.
    17. Arrowsmith, Martin & Griffiths, Martin & Franklin, Jeremy & Wohlmann, Evan & Young, Garry & Gregory, David, 2013. "SME forbearance and its implications for monetary and financial stability," Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin, Bank of England, vol. 53(4), pages 296-303.
    18. International Association of Deposit Insurers, 2015. "Enhanced Guidance for Effective Deposit Insurance Systems: Multiple Deposit Insurance Organizations," IADI Guidance Papers 15-05, International Association of Deposit Insurers.
    19. Lamorna Rogers, 2013. "A new approach to macro-prudential policy for New Zealand," Reserve Bank of New Zealand Bulletin, Reserve Bank of New Zealand, vol. 76, pages 12-22, September.
    20. Elfers, Ferdinand & Koenraadt, Jeroen, 2022. "What you don’t know won’t hurt you: Market monitoring and bank supervisors’ preference for private information," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:jbkreg:v:18:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1057_s41261-016-0005-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.