IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ovi/oviste/vxxiiy2022i1p400-406.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental Protection Network in the Context of Covid-19

Author

Listed:
  • Gabriela Piciu

    ("Victor Slăvescu" Centre of Financial and Monetary Research, Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

The paper proposes a model of dot-matrix approach to financial management as part of an environmental management. Presentation of all the matrices that will lead to development sourcedestination matrix (matrix funding integrative) constitutes a first attempt to approach the environmental financial management. The paper aims to identify sectoral interdependencies from the perspective of pollution, in terms of environmental costs and investments and the development of a mathematical model in which all links can be established and estimated statistically. The network is an integrated element of communication between interconnected elements in multiple dimensions, and networking is an adaptive response to the need for rapid development. Each node of the network is important because there is no hierarchy in the network, the emphasis being on relationships, not situations, on goals, roles played, on the nature and intensity of contacts between the elements that make up the network nodes. The specificity of the network is to ensure continuity between the micro macro and the world economic level. The negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as the policies adopted to combat it, have left their mark on the environment. Network financing is done to balance the damage to the environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Gabriela Piciu, 2022. "Environmental Protection Network in the Context of Covid-19," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(1), pages 400-406, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:ovi:oviste:v:xxii:y:2022:i:1:p:400-406
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://stec.univ-ovidius.ro/html/anale/RO/2022-2/Section%203/30.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wu, Tao & Zhang, Li-Guo & Ge, Teng, 2019. "Managing financing risk in capacity investment under green supply chain competition," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 37-44.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Haiyun, Cui & Zhixiong, Huang & Yüksel, Serhat & Dinçer, Hasan, 2021. "Analysis of the innovation strategies for green supply chain management in the energy industry using the QFD-based hybrid interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy decision approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    2. Junjian Wu & Henry Xu, 2021. "Information Leakage and Financing Decisions in a Supply Chain with Corporate Social Responsibility and Supply Uncertainty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-22, October.
    3. Ata Allah Taleizadeh & Aria Zaker Safaei & Arijit Bhattacharya & Alireza Amjadian, 2022. "Online peer-to-peer lending platform and supply chain finance decisions and strategies," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 315(1), pages 397-427, August.
    4. Li Ji & Tian Zeng, 2022. "Environmental “Fee-to-Tax” and Heavy Pollution Enterprises to De-Capacity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-24, April.
    5. Wu, Tao & Kung, Chih-Chun, 2020. "Carbon emissions, technology upgradation and financing risk of the green supply chain competition," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    6. Huan-Cheng Chang & Mei-Chin Wang & Hung-Chang Liao & Ya-huei Wang, 2019. "The Application of GSCM in Eliminating Healthcare Waste: Hospital EDC as an Example," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-13, October.
    7. Tao, Hu & Zhuang, Shan & Xue, Rui & Cao, Wei & Tian, Jinfang & Shan, Yuli, 2022. "Environmental Finance: An Interdisciplinary Review," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    8. Bowen Da & Chuanzhe Liu & Nana Liu & Sidun Fan, 2021. "Strategies of Two-Level Green Technology Investments for Coal Supply Chain under Different Dominant Modes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-24, March.
    9. Lu, Juan & Li, He, 2022. "Can high-speed rail improve enterprise capacity utilization? A perspective of supply side and demand side," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 152-163.
    10. Xia, Qiu & Zhi, Bangdong & Wang, Xiaojun, 2021. "The role of cross-shareholding in the green supply chain: Green contribution, power structure and coordination," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    11. Manavalan Ethirajan & Thanigai Arasu M & Jayakrishna Kandasamy & Vimal K.E.K & Simon Peter Nadeem & Anil Kumar, 2021. "Analysing the risks of adopting circular economy initiatives in manufacturing supply chains," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 204-236, January.
    12. Peng, Wei & Xiong, Langyu, 2022. "Managing financing costs and fostering green transition: The role of green financial policy in China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 820-836.
    13. Zhu, Lin & Cunningham, Scott W., 2022. "Unveiling the knowledge structure of technological forecasting and social change (1969–2020) through an NMF-based hierarchical topic model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    environment; negative impact; matrix; management; costs;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q01 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General - - - Sustainable Development
    • Q52 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Pollution Control Adoption and Costs; Distributional Effects; Employment Effects
    • Q58 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ovi:oviste:v:xxii:y:2022:i:1:p:400-406. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gheorghiu Gabriela (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feoviro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.