IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v35y2008i3p146-158.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does competitive research funding encourage diversity in higher education?

Author

Listed:
  • Hugo Horta
  • Jeroen Huisman
  • Manuel Heitor

Abstract

Based on the evolution of higher education systems in the last 50 years, this paper discusses the use of research funding mechanisms as privileged instruments to maintain and foster diversity in higher education systems. We suggest that competitive research funding supported by non-standardised evaluative processes may enable differentiation among institutions according to their resources and capabilities to develop research, while also recognising the limit to the use of such policy instruments. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • Hugo Horta & Jeroen Huisman & Manuel Heitor, 2008. "Does competitive research funding encourage diversity in higher education?," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 35(3), pages 146-158, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:35:y:2008:i:3:p:146-158
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.3152/030234208X299044
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tommaso Agasisti & Ekaterina Abalmasova & Ekaterina Shibanova & Aleksei Egorov, 2019. "The Causal Impact Of Performance-Based Funding On University Performance: Quasi-Experimental Evidence From A Policy In Russian Higher Education," HSE Working papers WP BRP 221/EC/2019, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    2. Chuanyi Wang & Qiang Zha, 2018. "Measuring systemic diversity of Chinese universities: a clustering-method approach," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(3), pages 1331-1347, May.
    3. Datta, Surja & Saad, Mohammed & Sarpong, David, 2019. "National systems of innovation, innovation niches, and diversity in university systems," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 27-36.
    4. Abramo, Giovanni & D’Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea & Rosati, Francesco, 2016. "A methodology to measure the effectiveness of academic recruitment and turnover," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 31-42.
    5. Daria P. Platonova & Dmitry S. Semyonov, 2014. "Program Diversification And Specialization In Russian Higher Education Institutions," HSE Working papers WP BRP 17/EDU/2014, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    6. Amara, Nabil & Rhaiem, Mehdi & Halilem, Norrin, 2020. "Assessing the research efficiency of Canadian scholars in the management field: Evidence from the DEA and fsQCA," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 296-306.
    7. Domenico A. Maisano & Luca Mastrogiacomo & Fiorenzo Franceschini, 2020. "Short-term effects of non-competitive funding to single academic researchers," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 123(3), pages 1261-1280, June.
    8. Oleg Leshukov & Daria Platonova & Dmitry Semyonov, 2016. "The Efficiency of Regional Higher Education Systems and Competition in Russia," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(2), pages 417-426.
    9. Mehdi Rhaiem, 2017. "Measurement and determinants of academic research efficiency: a systematic review of the evidence," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 110(2), pages 581-615, February.
    10. Abramo, Giovanni & Cicero, Tindaro & D’Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea, 2013. "The impact of unproductive and top researchers on overall university research performance," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 7(1), pages 166-175.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:35:y:2008:i:3:p:146-158. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.