IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rseval/v9y2000i2p145-150.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards a new science evaluation system for New Zealand

Author

Listed:
  • David A. Lillis

Abstract

Key issues arising from the development of a new outcome evaluation system for research funded through the Foundation for Research, Science and Technology, New Zealand’s major investor in scientific research, are discussed. ‘Outcomes’ here are material benefits contributing to quality of life. These benefits could include increased industrial competitiveness, quality of the environment, effective social regulation, and enhancements to skills and learning. ‘Outputs’ signify those process developments from research that are routine and represent no more than achievement at the programme or project level. Outputs may in practice include publications, patents, equipment and software. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • David A. Lillis, 2000. "Towards a new science evaluation system for New Zealand," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 9(2), pages 145-150, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:9:y:2000:i:2:p:145-150
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.3152/147154400781777287
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Walter, Alexander I. & Helgenberger, Sebastian & Wiek, Arnim & Scholz, Roland W., 2007. "Measuring societal effects of transdisciplinary research projects: Design and application of an evaluation method," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 325-338, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:9:y:2000:i:2:p:145-150. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/rev .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.