IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rseval/v24y2015i1p4-18..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effectiveness of policies for formal knowledge transfer from European universities and public research institutes to firms

Author

Listed:
  • Franz Barjak
  • Nordine Es-Sadki
  • Anthony Arundel

Abstract

We use survey data for 247 European universities and 40 public research organizations to investigate the effects of institutional policies on four outcomes of transfer performance (R&D agreements with companies, patent applications, licence agreements, and start-ups established). We find that the effects of policies to establish clear rules, improve transparency, and provide financial or non-financial incentives vary by outcome. Improving transparency by publishing the policies for licencing or intellectual property are often negatively correlated with outcomes, particularly for licence agreements. Out of three non-financial incentives, only social rewards have a rather positive effect (on start-ups), but financial incentives are positively correlated with several outcomes. A higher salary is positively linked to the number of research agreements and patent applications, while giving inventors a share of revenue is positively correlated with licencing and start-ups. The results suggest that the type of incentive as well as the degree of transparency of transfer policies should be chosen to complement the main transfer channels and strategy of the institution.

Suggested Citation

  • Franz Barjak & Nordine Es-Sadki & Anthony Arundel, 2015. "The effectiveness of policies for formal knowledge transfer from European universities and public research institutes to firms," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 24(1), pages 4-18.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:24:y:2015:i:1:p:4-18.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/reseval/rvu024
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bouwman, Harry & de Reuver, Mark & Nikou, Shahrokh, 2017. "The impact of Digitalization on Business Models: How IT Artefacts, Social Media, and Big Data Force Firms to Innovate Their Business Model," 14th ITS Asia-Pacific Regional Conference, Kyoto 2017: Mapping ICT into Transformation for the Next Information Society 168475, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    2. Jonathan C. Ho & Demei Lee, 2021. "Research commercialisation performance in different types of universities: case from Taiwan," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(10), pages 8617-8634, October.
    3. Federico Munari & Einar Rasmussen & Laura Toschi & Elisa Villani, 2016. "Determinants of the university technology transfer policy-mix: a cross-national analysis of gap-funding instruments," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 41(6), pages 1377-1405, December.
    4. Holgersson, Marcus & Aaboen, Lise, 2019. "A literature review of intellectual property management in technology transfer offices: From appropriation to utilization," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    5. Andreja Pucihar & Gregor Lenart & Mirjana Kljajić Borštnar & Doroteja Vidmar & Marjeta Marolt, 2019. "Drivers and Outcomes of Business Model Innovation—Micro, Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-17, January.
    6. Diane Coyle, 2021. "The idea of productivity," Working Papers 003, The Productivity Institute.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:24:y:2015:i:1:p:4-18.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/rev .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.