IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rseval/v13y2004i1p43-50.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The evaluation of social relevance in an environmental research programme

Author

Listed:
  • Merja Otronen

Abstract

This evaluates the Finnish Biodiversity Programme FIBRE. Aspects of programme management examined were: societal expectations and the administrative structure; possibilities in terms of organisations involved; and societal impact decisions. Examination of social relevance at programme level identified: relevance of programme objectives; research benefits produced; enhancement of programme/project interaction and networks; actions taken and the methods used for results dissemination; and economic, social and ecological impacts of research. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • Merja Otronen, 2004. "The evaluation of social relevance in an environmental research programme," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 13(1), pages 43-50, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:13:y:2004:i:1:p:43-50
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.3152/147154404781776527
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dotti, Nicola Francesco & Walczyk, Julia, 2022. "What is the societal impact of university research? A policy-oriented review to map approaches, identify monitoring methods and success factors," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:13:y:2004:i:1:p:43-50. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/rev .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.