IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/revage/v24y2002i1p3-14.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reaping What We Sow: Emerging Issues and Policy Implications of Agricultural Biotechnology

Author

Listed:
  • Lee Ann Jackson
  • Michele T. Villinski

Abstract

This essay assesses the U.S. government's role in managing rapid biotechnological change in agriculture. Many scientists hail recent agricultural biotechnology developments as steps toward solving the health, nutrition, and environmental problems that have plagued the world for decades. At the same time, some fear these biotechnological advances will leave a legacy of environmental threats, health problems, and ethical dilemmas for future generations. The impacts of these technologies on economies and the environment are unpredictable and government's role in regulating GM (genetically modified) technologies will need to be different than its functions in traditional agricultural policy. In this article, we consider current federal regulation of GM products, consumers' apprehensions about GM food, possible market failures due to agricultural biotechnology, and the policy significance of scientific uncertainty. We then suggest policy approaches that can address concerns about biotechnology and ensure that the potentially widespread public benefits from GM crop production are not ignored. Copyright 2002, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Lee Ann Jackson & Michele T. Villinski, 2002. "Reaping What We Sow: Emerging Issues and Policy Implications of Agricultural Biotechnology," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 24(1), pages 3-14.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:revage:v:24:y:2002:i:1:p:3-14
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/1467-9353.00080
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sarmiento, Camilo, 2003. "Socially Efficient Allocation Of Gm And Non-Gm Crops Under Contamination Risk," 2003 Annual meeting, July 27-30, Montreal, Canada 21954, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    2. Gray, Emily M. & Ahmadi-Esfahani, Fredoun Z., 2008. "Uncertainty aversion in Australian regulation of agricultural gene technology," 2008 Conference (52nd), February 5-8, 2008, Canberra, Australia 6045, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:revage:v:24:y:2002:i:1:p:3-14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press or Christopher F. Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.