IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/qjecon/v77y1963i2p210-235..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public Attitudes Toward Fiscal Programs

Author

Listed:
  • Eva Mueller

Abstract

I. Sample surveys as a tool for measuring attitudes toward fiscal policies, 211. — II. Some survey findings, 213. — III. The congruence and stability of fiscal preferences, 223. — IV. Group differences in attitudes toward fiscal policies, 228.

Suggested Citation

  • Eva Mueller, 1963. "Public Attitudes Toward Fiscal Programs," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 77(2), pages 210-235.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:qjecon:v:77:y:1963:i:2:p:210-235.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1884400
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rees-Jones, Alex & D’Attoma, John & Piolatto, Amedeo & Salvadori, Luca, 2022. "Experience of the COVID-19 pandemic and support for safety-net expansion," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 1090-1104.
    2. D.A.L. Auld, 1980. "Preference Revelation for Public Goods: an Empirical Analysis," Public Finance Review, , vol. 8(3), pages 277-289, July.
    3. James Ferris, 1983. "Demands for public spending: An attitudinal approach," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 40(2), pages 135-154, January.
    4. Bernd Hayo & Florian Neumeier, 2019. "Public Preferences for Government Spending Priorities: Survey Evidence from Germany," German Economic Review, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 20(4), pages 1-37, November.
    5. Ilyana Kuziemko & Michael I. Norton & Emmanuel Saez & Stefanie Stantcheva, 2015. "How Elastic Are Preferences for Redistribution? Evidence from Randomized Survey Experiments," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 105(4), pages 1478-1508, April.
    6. Ralph Miner, 1974. "Some observations on the political economy of property tax reform," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 49-62, March.
    7. Anderson, Robert N. & Nobe, Kenneth C., 1969. "Resource Economists as Spokesmen for the Sensitive Minority," WAEA/ WFEA Conference Archive (1929-1995) 323599, Western Agricultural Economics Association.
    8. Jeffrey Smith, 1975. "A clear test of rational voting," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 55-67, September.
    9. Judy A. Temple & Susan Porter‐Hudak, 1995. "Preferences For State Tax And Spending Policies: Evidence From Survey Data On The Role Of Income," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 7(1), pages 43-58, March.
    10. Shlomo Maital, 1975. "Preferences, Tax Structure and Tax Reform: Theory and Evidence," Public Finance Review, , vol. 3(1), pages 56-69, January.
    11. Markus Eller & Branimir Jovanovic & Thomas Scheiber, 2021. "What do people in CESEE think about public debt?," Focus on European Economic Integration, Oesterreichische Nationalbank (Austrian Central Bank), issue Q3/21, pages 35-58.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:qjecon:v:77:y:1963:i:2:p:210-235.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/qje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.