IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/oxford/v30y2014i4p680-696..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Increasing charitable giving in the developed world

Author

Listed:
  • Cynthia R. Jasper
  • Anya Savikhin Samek

Abstract

Charitable giving has continued to increase in economic importance in the developed world. For instance, in the United States, more than $335 billion—over 2 per cent of US GDP, was contributed to philanthropic organizations in 2013 alone. According to the World Giving Index, around 50–60 per cent of households in the developed world give to charity. The supply of charitable dollars is met by a high demand—billions are spent on fundraising activities annually. Field experiments have allowed us to learn about the different motivations of potential donors, as well as to identify the best strategies that non-profit organizations can use to attract funds. In this article, we discuss the work in this field to date. Then we suggest using selection into ‘the ask’ as a promising new direction for future research. We discuss strategies that charities can use in practice to take advantage of new research findings. Finally, we complement our discussion by presenting new evidence on giving behaviour in a door-to-door field experiment we conducted with over 1,000 households in a mid-sized city in the United States.

Suggested Citation

  • Cynthia R. Jasper & Anya Savikhin Samek, 2014. "Increasing charitable giving in the developed world," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 30(4), pages 680-696.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:oxford:v:30:y:2014:i:4:p:680-696.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/oxrep/gru032
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Margaret Samahita & Leonhard K. Lades, 2021. "The Unintended Side Effects of Regulating Charities: Donors Penalise Administrative Burden Almost as Much as Overheads," Working Papers 202106, School of Economics, University College Dublin.
    2. Abhishek Bhati & Ruth K. Hansen, 2020. "A literature review of experimental studies in fundraising," Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, Center for Experimental and Behavioral Public Administration, vol. 3(1).
    3. Krieg, Justin & Samek, Anya, 2017. "When charities compete: A laboratory experiment with simultaneous public goods," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 40-57.
    4. Christofer Adrian & Mukesh Garg & Anh Viet Pham & Soon-Yeow Phang & Cameron Truong, 2023. "Do Natural Disasters Affect Corporate Tax Avoidance? The Case of Drought," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 186(1), pages 105-135, August.
    5. David Reiley & Anya Samek, 2019. "Round Giving: A Field Experiment On Suggested Donation Amounts In Public‐Television Fundraising," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 57(2), pages 876-889, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:oxford:v:30:y:2014:i:4:p:680-696.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/oxrep .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.