IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/oxecpp/v75y2023i3p873-883..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Passing the buck!—how credible are self-reported measures of confidence in public institutions?

Author

Listed:
  • Somdeep Chatterjee

Abstract

Measures of confidence in public institutions are self-reported and therefore, susceptible to heterogeneity arising out of individual perceptions. In this article, I explore the possibility of individuals reporting lower levels of confidence in public institutions depending on their personal economic conditions, for which these institutions cannot be solely held responsible. Using nationally representative Indian data, I exploit exogenous sources of indebtedness in an instrumental variables regression approach to identify the causal effects of personal economic hardships on confidence in public institutions. The identification strategy relies on exogenous variation in the measure of indebtedness generated by a large monetary loss arising out of natural calamities such as accident, fire, or drought. I find that estimated coefficients from two-stage least square regressions are negative and statistically significant suggesting that an increase in indebtedness is associated with an erosion in confidence measures.

Suggested Citation

  • Somdeep Chatterjee, 2023. "Passing the buck!—how credible are self-reported measures of confidence in public institutions?," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 75(3), pages 873-883.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:oxecpp:v:75:y:2023:i:3:p:873-883.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/oep/gpac044
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • D91 - Microeconomics - - Micro-Based Behavioral Economics - - - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making
    • H83 - Public Economics - - Miscellaneous Issues - - - Public Administration
    • O12 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Microeconomic Analyses of Economic Development

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:oxecpp:v:75:y:2023:i:3:p:873-883.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/oep .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.