IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/oxecpp/v69y2017i1p239-262..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What can explain the Chinese patent explosion?

Author

Listed:
  • Markus Eberhardt
  • Christian Helmers
  • Zhihong Yu

Abstract

We analyse the ‘explosion’ of patent filings by Chinese residents, both domestically and in the USA during the early 2000s, employing a unique data set of 374,000 firms matching patent applications to manufacturing census data. Our analysis reveals that patenting is highly concentrated among a small number of firms, operating in the information and communication technology (ICT) sector. Although increases in patent filings by these companies are partly driven by increased R&D intensity, our analysis suggests that the explosion of patent filings at the Chinese patent office is driven by factors other than underlying innovative behaviour, including government subsidies that encourage patent filings directly.

Suggested Citation

  • Markus Eberhardt & Christian Helmers & Zhihong Yu, 2017. "What can explain the Chinese patent explosion?," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 69(1), pages 239-262.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:oxecpp:v:69:y:2017:i:1:p:239-262.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/oep/gpw042
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hong Li, 2023. "Innovation and financial performance: An assessment of patenting strategies of Chinese listed firms," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(2), pages 1693-1712, April.
    2. Yutao Sun & Cong Cao, 2021. "Planning for science: China’s “grand experiment” and global implications," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-9, December.
    3. Siping Luo & Mary E. Lovely & David Popp, 2017. "Intellectual returnees as drivers of indigenous innovation: Evidence from the Chinese photovoltaic industry," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(11), pages 2424-2454, November.
    4. Guopei Fang & Holger Görg & Aoife Hanley & Haiou Mao, 2022. "Foreign Divestment – Crisis or Chance for China's Innovation Edge?," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 30(6), pages 1-33, November.
    5. Carsten Fink & Bronwyn H. Hall & Christian Helmers, 2018. "Intellectual Property Use in Middle Income Countries: The Case of Chile," NBER Working Papers 24348, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Tetsugen Haruyama & Ken-ichi Hashimoto, 2020. "Innovators and imitators in a world economy," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 130(2), pages 157-186, July.
    7. Wu, Howei & Lin, Jia & Wu, Ho-Mou, 2022. "Investigating the real effect of China’s patent surge: New evidence from firm-level patent quality data," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 422-442.
    8. Xiaoying Li & Yin-Fang Zhang & Laixiang Sun, 2018. "Industry Agglomeration, Sub-National Institutions and the Profitability of Foreign Subsidiaries," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 58(6), pages 969-993, December.
    9. Jiafeng Gu, 2021. "Effects of Patent Policy on Outputs and Commercialization of Academic Patents in China: A Spatial Difference-in-Differences Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-17, December.
    10. Wenlong He & Zi-Lin He & Tony W. Tong, 2020. "Ownership Change and Firm Innovation: The Mediating Role of Interest Alignment," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(1), pages 17-38, March.
    11. Stephane Ruiz-Coupeau & Björn Jürgens & Michaela Keßelring & Victor Herrero-Solana, 2020. "Sustainability in Mineral Exploration—Exploring Less Invasive Technologies via Patent Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-18, November.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • L25 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Firm Performance
    • O12 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Microeconomic Analyses of Economic Development

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:oxecpp:v:69:y:2017:i:1:p:239-262.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/oep .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.