IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jcomle/v9y2013i3p709-737..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Saa Ii: Abuse Of Dominance In The South African Skies

Author

Listed:
  • Giulio Federico

Abstract

This article reviews an abuse of dominance decision against the incumbent domestic airline in South Africa (SAA) taken in 2010 and upheld on appeal in 2011. This case placed significant emphasis on the economic impact of the abusive conduct, and it represents a clear example of the adoption of an effects-based approach to assess exclusionary behavior by a dominant firm. As this article sets out, given the features of SAA's conduct and of the relevant market context, it is also possible to identify a coherent economic framework that can explain why SAA's rivals could not profitably match its incentive schemes and were therefore foreclosed. The conceptual issues raised by the SAA case are similar to the ones at stake in the landmark judgments on British Airways. The lessons from this case are therefore relevant to the ongoing antitrust debate on loyalty discounts.

Suggested Citation

  • Giulio Federico, 2013. "Saa Ii: Abuse Of Dominance In The South African Skies," Journal of Competition Law and Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 9(3), pages 709-737.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jcomle:v:9:y:2013:i:3:p:709-737.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/joclec/nht010
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liberty Mncube & Giulio Federico & Massimo Motta, 2022. "The Assessment of Exclusive Contracts: The Competition Case Against Computicket in South Africa," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 60(3), pages 403-429, May.
    2. Jacques Charlier, 2020. "South Africa’s contemporary airport geography, between past market dynamics and an uncertain future [La géographie aéroportuaire sud-africaine contemporaine, entre la dynamique récente du marché et," Post-Print hal-03325896, HAL.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • D82 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Asymmetric and Private Information; Mechanism Design
    • K21 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - Antitrust Law
    • L41 - Industrial Organization - - Antitrust Issues and Policies - - - Monopolization; Horizontal Anticompetitive Practices
    • L42 - Industrial Organization - - Antitrust Issues and Policies - - - Vertical Restraints; Resale Price Maintenance; Quantity Discounts
    • L93 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities - - - Air Transportation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jcomle:v:9:y:2013:i:3:p:709-737.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jcle .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.