IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jcomle/v7y2011i2p427-453..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Incentive Compatible Mechanism Design Induce Competitive Entry?

Author

Listed:
  • Sumit K. Majumdar

Abstract

This article evaluates the impact of the introduction of incentive regulation on competitive entry in the territories of the firms making up the population of local exchange carriers in the United States between 1988 and 2001. The results show that the rate of return method and other intermediate incentive schemes have had a negative impact on competitive entry. Conversely, the introduction of pure price caps schemes had a positive and significant impact on competitive entry in incumbent telecommunications firms' markets. These results highlight the importance of proper and appropriate incentive compatible mechanism design in altering the playing field so that competitive entry can occur.

Suggested Citation

  • Sumit K. Majumdar, 2011. "Does Incentive Compatible Mechanism Design Induce Competitive Entry?," Journal of Competition Law and Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 7(2), pages 427-453.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jcomle:v:7:y:2011:i:2:p:427-453.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/joclec/nhq028
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Majumdar, Sumit K., 2015. "Competitor entry impact on jobs and wages in incumbent firms: retrospective evidence from a natural experiment," Business and Politics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 17(2), pages 291-326, August.
    2. Sumit K. Majumdar & Rabih Moussawi & Ulku Yaylacicegi, 2014. "Do Incumbents’ Mergers Influence Entrepreneurial Entry? An Evaluation," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 38(3), pages 601-633, May.
    3. Majumdar, Sumit K., 2016. "Debt and communications technology diffusion: Retrospective evidence," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 458-474.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • L43 - Industrial Organization - - Antitrust Issues and Policies - - - Legal Monopolies and Regulation or Deregulation
    • L51 - Industrial Organization - - Regulation and Industrial Policy - - - Economics of Regulation
    • L96 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities - - - Telecommunications

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jcomle:v:7:y:2011:i:2:p:427-453.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jcle .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.