IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jcomle/v7y2011i1p205-240..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Collusion On Private Health Insurance Coverage In Chile

Author

Listed:
  • Claudio A. Agostini
  • Eduardo Saavedra
  • Manuel Willington

Abstract

In September 2005, the Chilean Competition Authority filed a lawsuit against five private health insurance providers for violation of antitrust laws. They were accused of colluding to reduce the coverage levels of their plans. Between March 2002 and March 2003, they reduced the coverage offered from 100 percent for hospitalization and 80 percent for ambulatory care to 90 percent and 70 percent, respectively. These facts were undisputed, but, logically, the mere observation of parallel conduct is not enough to infer collusion. In this article, we analyze the merits of the accusation and find strong support for it. We first present evidence on the definition of the relevant market (that excludes the public insurer) and the presence of entry barriers. We then present a simple model of imperfect competition that gives some testable predictions to separate the hypotheses that insurers colluded to reduce coverage and the one—argued during the trial by the insurers—that the coverage reduction was a competitive reaction to a cost shock. We then present econometric evidence consistent only with the hypothesis of collusion: The accused insurers reduced sales efforts and marketing expenses relative to the non-accused insurers, the monthly transfer rates of insurees among accused insurers decreased during the period of the alleged agreement relative to the rate of the non-accused insurers, and profits of both accused and non-accused insurers increased after the coverage reduction.

Suggested Citation

  • Claudio A. Agostini & Eduardo Saavedra & Manuel Willington, 2011. "Collusion On Private Health Insurance Coverage In Chile," Journal of Competition Law and Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 7(1), pages 205-240.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jcomle:v:7:y:2011:i:1:p:205-240.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/joclec/nhq023
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Martinez-Gutierrez, María Soledad & Cuadrado, Cristóbal, 2017. "Health policy in the concertación era (1990–2010): Reforms the chilean way," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 117-126.
    2. Bronfman, Javier, 2014. "Universal health insurance under a dual system, evidence of adverse selection against the public sector: the case of Chile," MPRA Paper 63262, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • L41 - Industrial Organization - - Antitrust Issues and Policies - - - Monopolization; Horizontal Anticompetitive Practices
    • D43 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design - - - Oligopoly and Other Forms of Market Imperfection
    • I11 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Analysis of Health Care Markets

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jcomle:v:7:y:2011:i:1:p:205-240.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jcle .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.