IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jcomle/v1y2005i3p427-439..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing Antitrust Enforcement In The United States And Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Douglas H. Ginsburg

Abstract

Among the many important changes wrought by Regulation 1/2003 are the decentralization of responsibility for enforcing EU competition law from Brussels to Member States and the creation of the European Competition Network to encourage coordination and information-sharing among the 26 competition authorities in the EU. This article contrasts Europe's new system of competition enforcement under Regulation 1/2003 with that of the United States. I focus upon two of the more significant features of the U.S. system: the dual legislative and enforcement authority of the States and the Federal Government, and private enforcement. The Commission is presently evaluating measures to facilitate private enforcement and is set to release a Green Paper on that topic later this year. I highlight a few characteristics that have made private enforcement such a significant component of the U.S. antitrust regime, in some ways and at some times providing too much incentive for plaintiffs, at the expense of neutral or procompetitive business activity.

Suggested Citation

  • Douglas H. Ginsburg, 2005. "Comparing Antitrust Enforcement In The United States And Europe," Journal of Competition Law and Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 1(3), pages 427-439.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:jcomle:v:1:y:2005:i:3:p:427-439.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/joclec/nhi017
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rajabiun Reza, 2009. "Competition Law as Development Policy: Evidence from Poland," The Law and Development Review, De Gruyter, vol. 2(1), pages 116-150, August.
    2. Mariotti, Sergio & Marzano, Riccardo, 2021. "The effects of competition policy, regulatory quality and trust on inward FDI in host countries," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(6).
    3. McAfee, R. Preston & Mialon, Hugo M. & Mialon, Sue H., 2008. "Private v. public antitrust enforcement: A strategic analysis," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(10-11), pages 1863-1875, October.
    4. Sergio Mariotti, 2023. "Competition policy in the new wave of global protectionism. Prospects for preserving a fdi-friendly institutional environment," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 50(2), pages 227-241, June.
    5. Huo, Jingjing, 2015. "How Nations Innovate: The Political Economy of Technological Innovation in Affluent Capitalist Economies," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198735847.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jcomle:v:1:y:2005:i:3:p:427-439.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jcle .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.