IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/indcch/v26y2017i6p997-1020..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The productivity spillover between SMEs and large firms in Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Jin Woong Kim
  • Young-Jin Ro

Abstract

This article investigates the inter-firm spillover effect of productivities among two different-sized firms in Korea—large enterprises and small and medium enterprises (SMEs)—considering industrial relationships. After estimating total factor productivity in Korea by industry and firm size, we set and estimate two models using the cointegrating relationship of the Panel Error Correction Model—Model 1 for inter-industrial spillover effect and Model 2 for spillover effect between large firms and SMEs. Our study provides three major findings. First, a productivity gap exists between large enterprises and SMEs in Korea. Second, this productivity gap between large firms and SMEs has been expanding. Third, the R&D efficiency in large enterprises is greater than that in SMEs. Finally, the spillover effects in both firm groups in Korea are asymmetric. That is, even if the productivity spillover effect is significant in enterprises of both sizes, a large enterprise is more likely than an SME to benefit from the spillover effects.

Suggested Citation

  • Jin Woong Kim & Young-Jin Ro, 2017. "The productivity spillover between SMEs and large firms in Korea," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 26(6), pages 997-1020.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:indcch:v:26:y:2017:i:6:p:997-1020.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/icc/dtx012
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maciej Urbaniak & Piotr Rogala & Piotr Kafel, 2023. "Expectations of manufacturing companies regarding future priorities of improvement actions taken by their suppliers," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 296-310, March.
    2. Beldina Owalla & Cristian Gherhes & Tim Vorley & Chay Brooks, 2022. "Mapping SME productivity research: a systematic review of empirical evidence and future research agenda," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 58(3), pages 1285-1307, March.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • C23 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Models with Panel Data; Spatio-temporal Models
    • L16 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Industrial Organization and Macroeconomics; Macroeconomic Industrial Structure
    • L52 - Industrial Organization - - Regulation and Industrial Policy - - - Industrial Policy; Sectoral Planning Methods
    • O25 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Development Planning and Policy - - - Industrial Policy
    • O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D
    • O40 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:indcch:v:26:y:2017:i:6:p:997-1020.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/icc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.