IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/indcch/v11y2002i5p1031-1057.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Industrial ecology and the rediscovery of inter-firm recycling linkages: historical evidence and policy implications

Author

Listed:
  • Pierre Desrochers

Abstract

'Industrial ecology' is one of the most influential perspectives to have emerged in recent years in the wider discourse on 'sustainable development'. The vast majority of industrial ecologists believe that past economic development was characterized by a linear system of extraction, use and disposal. One of their main goals is therefore to find ways to make modern industrial economies mimic ecosystems by transforming the waste of one firm into the valuable input of another. Historical evidence presented in this article, however, demonstrates that inter-firm recycling linkages were a dominant characteristic of past economic development. If this was the case, why do most writers on sustainability believe otherwise? I suggest two broad categories of explanation: a lack of research into the spontaneous formation of inter-firm recycling linkages; and the progressive and cumulative implementation of market distortions and regulatory barriers to resource recovery over the last century. One implication of these findings is that the most important task facing industrial ecologists is probably not the technical challenge of planning resource recovery between firms, but the development of an institutional framework that forces firms to 'internalize their externalities' while leaving them the necessary freedom to develop new and profitable uses for by-products. Copyright 2002, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Pierre Desrochers, 2002. "Industrial ecology and the rediscovery of inter-firm recycling linkages: historical evidence and policy implications," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 11(5), pages 1031-1057, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:indcch:v:11:y:2002:i:5:p:1031-1057
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Akvilė Feiferytė-Skirienė & Žaneta Stasiškienė, 2021. "Seeking Circularity: Circular Urban Metabolism in the Context of Industrial Symbiosis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-31, August.
    2. Grazia Cecere & Nicoletta Corrocher & Cédric Gossart & Muge Ozman, 2014. "Lock-in and path dependence: an evolutionary approach to eco-innovations," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 24(5), pages 1037-1065, November.
    3. Yong Geng & Murray Haight & Qinghua Zhu, 2007. "Empirical analysis of eco-industrial development in China," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 15(2), pages 121-133.
    4. Phillips, Paul S. & Barnes, Richard & Bates, Margaret P. & Coskeran, Thomas, 2006. "A critical appraisal of an UK county waste minimisation programme: The requirement for regional facilitated development of industrial symbiosis/ecology," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 242-264.
    5. Erwan Queinnec & Pierre Desrochers, 2012. "Can Market Economy Be Ecology-Friendly ? The Case Of Waste Recycling In The Nineteenth Century," Post-Print hal-01367963, HAL.
    6. Scott F. Turner & Will Mitchell & Richard A. Bettis, 2010. "Responding to Rivals and Complements: How Market Concentration Shapes Generational Product Innovation Strategy," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(4), pages 854-872, August.
    7. Kronenberg, Jakub & Winkler, Ralph, 2009. "Wasted waste: An evolutionary perspective on industrial by-products," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(12), pages 3026-3033, October.
    8. Christine Meisner Rosen, 2012. "Fact Versus Conjecture in the History of Industrial Waste Utilization," Econ Journal Watch, Econ Journal Watch, vol. 9(2), pages 112-121, May.
    9. Jonathan S. Krones, 2017. "Industrial Symbiosis in the Upper Valley: A Study of the Casella-Hypertherm Recycling Partnership," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-16, May.
    10. Mannino, Ilda & Ninka, Eniel & Turvani, Margherita, 2014. "Porto Marghera and the Industrial Ecology Challenge: Why it did not become an Eco-Industrial Park," MPRA Paper 55166, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Taddeo, Raffaella & Simboli, Alberto & Morgante, Anna & Erkman, Suren, 2017. "The Development of Industrial Symbiosis in Existing Contexts. Experiences From Three Italian Clusters," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 55-67.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:indcch:v:11:y:2002:i:5:p:1031-1057. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/icc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.