IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v77y2022i8p1431-1441..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Not “The More The Merrier”: Diminishing Returns to Daily Face-To-Face Social Interaction Frequency for Well-Being in Older Age

Author

Listed:
  • Minxia Luo
  • Birthe Macdonald
  • Gizem Hülür

Abstract

ObjectivesWhile being socially active is beneficial for well-being in older age, it is unclear whether effects of social interactions on well-being indicate “the more the merrier” or if they have limits as individuals socialize more or less across different days. This study addressed diminishing returns to social interaction frequency for well-being.MethodWe examined data from an event-contingent experience sampling study from 116 Swiss older adults (65 to 94 years old) over 21 days. Participants reported face-to-face social interactions once they occurred and daily well-being (i.e., positive and negative affect, loneliness) in the evenings.ResultsOn average, participants had 2.09 face-to-face social interactions per day. Linear and quadratic effects from multilevel models conjointly indicated that a higher number of daily social interactions was associated with higher daily positive affect and lower daily negative affect and loneliness, but that well-being reached its peak at 2–3 times above participants’ typical daily interaction frequency. Once these numbers were surpassed, the benefit of additional social interactions diminished. Additionally, participants who typically had fewer social interactions, were unmarried, lived alone, and had more health conditions showed stronger associations between daily social interaction frequency and well-being.DiscussionOur findings suggest the benefits of social interactions on well-being exhibit diminishing returns. Social interactions may play a bigger role in older adults with less satiation for desire to belong and a limited future time perspective. We discuss these findings in terms of the belongingness hypothesis and the socioemotional selectivity theory.

Suggested Citation

  • Minxia Luo & Birthe Macdonald & Gizem Hülür, 2022. "Not “The More The Merrier”: Diminishing Returns to Daily Face-To-Face Social Interaction Frequency for Well-Being in Older Age," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 77(8), pages 1431-1441.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:77:y:2022:i:8:p:1431-1441.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbac010
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Di Zhao & Guopeng Li & Miao Zhou & Qing Wang & Yiming Gao & Xiangyu Zhao & Xinting Zhang & Ping Li, 2022. "Differences According to Sex in the Relationship between Social Participation and Well-Being: A Network Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-11, October.
    2. Heng Cui & Nor Zarifah Maliki & Yaqian Wang, 2024. "The Role of Urban Parks in Promoting Social Interaction of Older Adults in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-18, March.
    3. Wang, Kun & Gu, Danan, 2023. "Reciprocal associations between social media use and self-perception of aging among older adults: Do men and women differ?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 321(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:77:y:2022:i:8:p:1431-1441.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.